On Sun, 15 Apr 2012 11:07:16 +0300, Mika Suomalainen wrote:
> 15.04.2012 00:53, Camaleón kirjoitti: <...>
>>
>> P.S. I find quite hard to understand why there are users who despite
>> consider my postings to be sort a "newbie killers" and "soft-mind
>> perverters" are still replying to them. The
15.04.2012 00:53, Camaleón kirjoitti:
<...>
>
> P.S. I find quite hard to understand why there are users who despite
> consider my postings to be sort a "newbie killers" and "soft-mind
> perverters" are still replying to them. The only conclusion I can reach
> for this behaviour is that: 1/ my
On Sun, 15 Apr 2012 02:59:02 +1200, Chris Bannister wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 05:03:41PM +, Camaleón wrote:
>> «In the interleaved reply style (also called "inline reply", "point-by-
>> point rebuttal", or, sometimes, "bottom posting")...»
>^^
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 05:03:41PM +, Camaleón wrote:
> «In the interleaved reply style (also called "inline reply", "point-by-
> point rebuttal", or, sometimes, "bottom posting")...»
^^^
> «In the "bottom-posting" style, the reply is appended to
On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 01:38:59PM -0700, Al Eridani wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 11:48 AM, Chris Bannister
> wrote:
>
> > But you said above, and I quote:
> >
> > 'A bottom posting style does not mean "all the stuff goes to the bottom"
> >
> > and now you are saying in response to
> >
> > "So
On Thu, 12 Apr 2012 00:18:28 +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Mi, 11 apr 12, 17:03:41, Camaleón wrote:
>>
>> «In the "bottom-posting" style, the reply is appended to a full or
>> partial copy of the original message. The name bottom-posting is
>> sometimes used for inline-style replies, and inde
On Mi, 11 apr 12, 17:03:41, Camaleón wrote:
>
> «In the "bottom-posting" style, the reply is appended to a full or
> partial copy of the original message. The name bottom-posting is
> sometimes used for inline-style replies, and indeed the two formats are
> the same when only one point is being
On Wed, 11 Apr 2012 19:51:48 +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Mi, 11 apr 12, 15:44:29, Camaleón wrote:
>>
>> > Just because somebody chooses to stay out of this thread does not
>> > mean one automatically agrees with you ;)
>>
>> It's not *me* who says so, it's written in the Wikipedia article,
On Mi, 11 apr 12, 15:44:29, Camaleón wrote:
>
> > Just because somebody chooses to stay out of this thread does not mean
> > one automatically agrees with you ;)
>
> It's not *me* who says so, it's written in the Wikipedia article, you
> will have to ask the author why he/she thinks so :-)
That
On Wed, 11 Apr 2012 18:26:12 +0300, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Lu, 09 apr 12, 13:34:59, Camaleón wrote:
>>
>> To me (and everybody else), both are almost the same.
>
> Could you please explain the "everybody else" part?
As I guess you've followed the whole thread, what's exactly what you
don't
On Lu, 09 apr 12, 13:34:59, Camaleón wrote:
>
> To me (and everybody else), both are almost the same.
Could you please explain the "everybody else" part?
Just because somebody chooses to stay out of this thread does not mean
one automatically agrees with you ;)
Kind regards,
Andrei
--
Offtopi
On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 11:48 AM, Chris Bannister
wrote:
> But you said above, and I quote:
>
> 'A bottom posting style does not mean "all the stuff goes to the bottom"
>
> and now you are saying in response to
>
> "So what's it called when you plonk everything at the bottom, oops
> sorry, at the
On Mon, 09 Apr 2012 06:48:23 +1200, Chris Bannister wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 08, 2012 at 02:18:48PM +, Camaleón wrote:
(...)
>> > So what's it called when you plonk everything at the bottom, oops
>> > sorry, at the very end? End posting?
>>
>> That's also "bottom posting". No need to reinvent t
On Sun, Apr 08, 2012 at 02:18:48PM +, Camaleón wrote:
> On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 15:47:51 +1200, Chris Bannister wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Apr 07, 2012 at 02:58:24PM +, Camaleón wrote:
>
> >> >> A bottom posting style does not mean "all the stuff goes to the
> >> >> bottom"
> >> >
> >> > Yes it do
In linux.debian.user, Chris Bannister wrote:
>
> No, you are confused. There are three entirely different distinct styles:
> 1) Top posting
> 2) Bottom posting
> 3) Interleaved, inline, conversation. style.
>
> Therefore, it makes sense to have *THREE* different definitions.
> correct?
>
There are
On Sun, 08 Apr 2012 15:47:51 +1200, Chris Bannister wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 07, 2012 at 02:58:24PM +, Camaleón wrote:
>> >> A bottom posting style does not mean "all the stuff goes to the
>> >> bottom"
>> >
>> > Yes it does! That is what bottom posting is.
>>
>> No sir, is just the name what i
On Sat, Apr 07, 2012 at 02:58:24PM +, Camaleón wrote:
> On Sat, 07 Apr 2012 06:11:19 +1200, Chris Bannister wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 04:03:05PM +, Camaleón wrote:
> >> Bottom posting has been since long the preferred method for newsgroups
> >> and then mailing lists but not for
On Sat, 07 Apr 2012 06:11:19 +1200, Chris Bannister wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 04:03:05PM +, Camaleón wrote:
>> Bottom posting has been since long the preferred method for newsgroups
>> and then mailing lists but not for forums nor business communications.
>>
>> A bottom posting style d
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 04:03:05PM +, Camaleón wrote:
> Bottom posting has been since long the preferred method for newsgroups
> and then mailing lists but not for forums nor business communications.
>
> A bottom posting style does not mean "all the stuff goes to the bottom"
Yes it does! Th
On Sun 01 Apr 2012 at 14:04:05 +, Camaleón wrote:
> ***
> http://www.openprinting.org/ppd-o-matic.php?driver=pxlcolor&printer=Generic-PCL_6_PCL_XL_Printer&show=1
>
> *OpenUI *Duplex/Double-Sided Printing: PickOne
> (...)
> ***
Without leaving the comfort of your fireside and with foomatic-db
On Sat, 31 Mar 2012 20:28:09 +0200, Leonard Le-Rey wrote:
> 2012/3/31 Camaleón :
>> On Fri, 30 Mar 2012 20:00:23 +0200, Leonard Le-Rey wrote:
>>
>>> 2012/3/30 Brian :
>>
>> (...)
>>
The PDF file is unlikely to be the problem.
>>> It is obviously not a driver problem, as the driver from K
On Sat 31 Mar 2012 at 20:28:09 +0200, Leonard Le-Rey wrote:
> Hey guys, thanks for your answers!
> So the current state is the following:
>
> 1.) With the Generic-PCL-6-PCL-XL, everything works fine and the PDF
> is printed without any problems. This is fine for me for the moment,
> of course, du
2012/3/31 Camaleón :
> On Fri, 30 Mar 2012 20:00:23 +0200, Leonard Le-Rey wrote:
>
>> 2012/3/30 Brian :
>
> (...)
>
>>> The PDF file is unlikely to be the problem.
>>>
>> It is obviously not a driver problem, as the driver from Kyocera is the
>> most recent and works fine on other systems (such as
On Fri, 30 Mar 2012 20:00:23 +0200, Leonard Le-Rey wrote:
> 2012/3/30 Brian :
(...)
>> The PDF file is unlikely to be the problem.
>>
> It is obviously not a driver problem, as the driver from Kyocera is the
> most recent and works fine on other systems (such as Ubuntu 11.10).
(...)
You can't
On Fri 30 Mar 2012 at 20:00:23 +0200, Leonard Le-Rey wrote:
> It is obviously not a driver problem, as the driver from Kyocera is
> the most recent and works fine on other systems (such as Ubuntu
> 11.10). So as you suggested, it is the cups which is affected - as
> reported by others. Hence I wil
2012/3/30 Brian :
> On Fri 30 Mar 2012 at 16:29:40 +0200, Leonard Le-Rey wrote:
>
>> Debian testing (wheezy) has recognized the network printer Kyocera
>> FSC-5100DN correctly, I have first taken the driver offered by Debian
>> and then the one offered by Kyocera. If
On Fri 30 Mar 2012 at 16:29:40 +0200, Leonard Le-Rey wrote:
> Debian testing (wheezy) has recognized the network printer Kyocera
> FSC-5100DN correctly, I have first taken the driver offered by Debian
> and then the one offered by Kyocera. If I print I standard text
> document create
On Fri, 30 Mar 2012 08:34:54 -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 8:28 AM, Camaleón wrote:
>> On Fri, 30 Mar 2012 18:25:42 +0300, Mika Suomalainen wrote:
>>
>>> Could someone explain me, what are "top- and bottom posting" styles?
>>
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
>
On Friday 30 March 2012 16:34:54 Paul Johnson wrote:
> Though it's generally ideal to go with a conversational style,
> inserting new text within the quoted material for context. Top
> posting almost never meets this, bottom posting only works when the
> post you're responding to is very short.
S
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 8:28 AM, Camaleón wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Mar 2012 18:25:42 +0300, Mika Suomalainen wrote:
>
>> Could someone explain me, what are "top- and bottom posting" styles?
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
Though it's generally ideal to go with a conversational style,
in
On 2012-03-30 16:29:40, Leonard Le-Rey wrote:
> If I want to
> print a PDF produced by pdfLaTex, it might print one page but if I
> print a larger amount, I get the following printout error message:
>
> ERROR:
> undefined
> OFFENDING COMMAND:
> m
> STACK:
> --nostringval--
> 133
>
> and nothing i
On Fri, 30 Mar 2012 18:25:42 +0300, Mika Suomalainen wrote:
> Could someone explain me, what are "top- and bottom posting" styles?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
Greetings,
--
Camaleón
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscri
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Could someone explain me, what are "top- and bottom posting" styles?
On 30.03.2012 18:21, Camaleón wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Mar 2012 16:53:24 +0200, Leonard Le-Rey wrote:
>
> (pelase, keep a bottom-posting style, thanks :-) )
>
>> 2012/3/30 Camaleón :
>
On Fri, 30 Mar 2012 16:53:24 +0200, Leonard Le-Rey wrote:
(pelase, keep a bottom-posting style, thanks :-) )
> 2012/3/30 Camaleón :
(...)
>>> Is there a way to take the Ubuntu PPD file? And if, how I get it to
>>> try on the Debian system?
>>
>> Yes, just copy/paste from one computer to the ot
thing proper...
Thanks!
2012/3/30 Camaleón :
> On Fri, 30 Mar 2012 16:29:40 +0200, Leonard Le-Rey wrote:
>
>> Debian testing (wheezy) has recognized the network printer Kyocera
>> FSC-5100DN correctly, I have first taken the driver offered by Debian
>> and then the one off
On Fri, 30 Mar 2012 16:29:40 +0200, Leonard Le-Rey wrote:
> Debian testing (wheezy) has recognized the network printer Kyocera
> FSC-5100DN correctly, I have first taken the driver offered by Debian
> and then the one offered by Kyocera. If I print I standard text document
> create
Hey guys,
Debian testing (wheezy) has recognized the network printer Kyocera
FSC-5100DN correctly, I have first taken the driver offered by Debian
and then the one offered by Kyocera. If I print I standard text
document created for eg. by Libre Office, it works fine. If I want to
print a PDF
37 matches
Mail list logo
