Hi There,
I had a linux box to do pppoe auth from my billion ADSL modem
eth0 connected to modem (Billion BiPAC 7402NX)
eth1 to my linksys router connected to LAN
Both billion and linksys having gigabit LAN port
I am using webmin to configure pppoe.conf and to start the ADSL connection
A while ag
On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 08:02:40AM +0200, Joe Hart wrote:
> Ah, then it is most likely the dhcp client causing your problem with the
> resolv.conf
>
> You can edit the file /etc/dhcp3/dhclient.conf and look for this line.
>
> #prepend domain-name-servers 127.0.0.1;
>
> Remove the comment and cha
On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 07:57:59AM +0530, Deboo ^ wrote:
> On 5/7/07, Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snipped us trying not to get on each other's nerves ;) ]
>
> >> dhcp is installed and I installed pump too since the dhcp client I saw
> >> at times unable to get any ip at boo
On 5/7/07, Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yep I meant that above line. Ip address means an "ip address" after
> all not hostname. And yes may be n00bs don't make a difference
> between the two. I'm no expert at all but not a n00b atleast.
not implying that you're a noob, ju
On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 10:27:23AM +0530, Deboo ^ wrote:
> On 5/7/07, Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On Sun, May 06, 2007 at 07:11:34PM +0530, Deboo ^ wrote:
> >> On 5/5/07, Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> >On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 05:12:25PM +0530, Deboo ^
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Deboo ^ wrote:
> On 5/7/07, Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Sun, May 06, 2007 at 07:11:34PM +0530, Deboo ^ wrote:
>> > On 5/5/07, Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > >On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 05:12:25PM +0530, De
On 5/7/07, Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sun, May 06, 2007 at 07:11:34PM +0530, Deboo ^ wrote:
> On 5/5/07, Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 05:12:25PM +0530, Deboo ^ wrote:
> >> Also note that I tried pinging remote ip addresses (l
On Sun, May 06, 2007 at 07:11:34PM +0530, Deboo ^ wrote:
> On 5/5/07, Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 05:12:25PM +0530, Deboo ^ wrote:
> >> Also note that I tried pinging remote ip addresses (like google.com's
> >> and yahoo.com's) and was unable to get a
On Sun, 6 May 2007 19:11:34 +0530
"Deboo ^" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 5/5/07, Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 05:12:25PM +0530, Deboo ^ wrote:
> > > Also note that I tried pinging remote ip addresses (like google.com's
> > > and yahoo.com's) and w
Deboo writes:
> Now I changed the mode of the /etc/resolv.conf to not writable by even
> root and made it unmutable and still it's hapenning. Who is changing the
> nameserver to 192.168.0.1 and how?
Do you have resolvconf installed?
--
John Hasler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 5/5/07, Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 05:12:25PM +0530, Deboo ^ wrote:
> Also note that I tried pinging remote ip addresses (like google.com's
> and yahoo.com's) and was unable to get any response.
is that by ip address or by name?
Well it should
On Sat, May 05, 2007 at 05:12:25PM +0530, Deboo ^ wrote:
> Also note that I tried pinging remote ip addresses (like google.com's
> and yahoo.com's) and was unable to get any response.
is that by ip address or by name?
A
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Also note that I tried pinging remote ip addresses (like google.com's
and yahoo.com's) and was unable to get any response.
Regards,
Deboo
--
Please don't Cc: me, I'm subscribed to the list.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
Hello,
I just installed Etch using the netinstall CD. Also installed pppoe
using dpkg, from the CD packages manually. pppoe detects and makes the
connection. ifconfig shows the ppp0 details and the ip too.
But I'm unable to ping any remote servers. I am able to ping the ISP
gateway though. The c
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 25 Mar 2006 22:44:11 -0600
anoop aryal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Saturday 25 March 2006 09:24 pm, Jacob S wrote:
> [snip]
> > > > # ping longbow.arroway.com -c 1 -M do -s 1472
> > > > PING longbow.arroway.com (66.252.129.166) 1472(1500)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
anoop aryal schrieb am 26.03.2006 06:44:
> hope that clears it up for you. let me know if you have questions.
Yup it does. Thanks a lot cause I had look a lot for some deep insight
of this mtu/mtr thing.
Thanks for enlighten me up. :D
bye
On Saturday 25 March 2006 09:24 pm, Jacob S wrote:
[snip]
> > > # ping longbow.arroway.com -c 1 -M do -s 1472
> > > PING longbow.arroway.com (66.252.129.166) 1472(1500) bytes of data.
> > > From pool-71-244-52-50.dllstx.fios.verizon.net (71.244.52.50)
> > > icmp_seq=1 Frag needed and DF set (mtu =
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 24 Mar 2006 11:49:56 -0500
Gene Heskett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 24 March 2006 07:55, Jacob S wrote:
> >
> >So then I added the line
> >pty "/usr/sbin/pppoe -I eth0 -T 80 -m 1464"
> >to /etc/ppp/peers/dsl-provider, but the probl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 24 Mar 2006 10:33:07 -0600
anoop aryal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 24 March 2006 06:55 am, Jacob S wrote:
> > On Thu, 23 Mar 2006 14:35:20 -0600
> >
> > anoop aryal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > On Thursday 23 March 2006 10:5
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 24 Mar 2006 19:33:28 -0500
Marty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jacob S wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > On Thu, 23 Mar 2006 17:53:17 +0100
> > jmt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> > So, this proble
Jacob S wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 23 Mar 2006 17:53:17 +0100
jmt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So, this problem has me stumped. I've tried playing around with the
> PPPoe options in /etc/ppp/peers/dsl-provider, and re-ran pppoeconf a
> couple times, but I can
On Friday 24 March 2006 07:55, Jacob S wrote:
>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>Hash: SHA1
>
>On Thu, 23 Mar 2006 14:35:20 -0600
>
>anoop aryal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > > On Thursday 23 March 2006 10:58, Jacob S wrote:
>> > > >-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> > > >Hash: SHA1
>> > > >
On Friday 24 March 2006 06:55 am, Jacob S wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Mar 2006 14:35:20 -0600
>
> anoop aryal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > On Thursday 23 March 2006 10:58, Jacob S wrote:
> > > > >-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > > > >Hash: SHA1
> > > > >
> > > > >Howdy list,
> > > > >
> > > > >
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 23 Mar 2006 14:35:20 -0600
anoop aryal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Thursday 23 March 2006 10:58, Jacob S wrote:
> > > >-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > > >Hash: SHA1
> > > >
> > > >Howdy list,
> > > >
> > > >I recently changed IS
On Thursday 23 March 2006 15:35, anoop aryal wrote:
>On Thursday 23 March 2006 01:13 pm, Jacob S wrote:
>> On Thu, 23 Mar 2006 12:27:26 -0500
>>
>> Gene Heskett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > On Thursday 23 March 2006 10:58, Jacob S wrote:
>> > >-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> > >Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 23 March 2006 01:13 pm, Jacob S wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Mar 2006 12:27:26 -0500
>
> Gene Heskett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thursday 23 March 2006 10:58, Jacob S wrote:
> > >-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > >Hash: SHA1
> > >
> > >Howdy list,
> > >
> > >I recently changed ISPs,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 23 Mar 2006 12:27:26 -0500
Gene Heskett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday 23 March 2006 10:58, Jacob S wrote:
> >-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> >Hash: SHA1
> >
> >Howdy list,
> >
> >I recently changed ISPs, away from static ips on
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 23 Mar 2006 17:53:17 +0100
jmt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > So, this problem has me stumped. I've tried playing around with the
> > PPPoe options in /etc/ppp/peers/dsl-provider, and re-ran pppoeconf a
> > couple times, but I can't get aro
On Thursday 23 March 2006 10:58, Jacob S wrote:
>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>Hash: SHA1
>
>Howdy list,
>
>I recently changed ISPs, away from static ips on a dsl line to a
> single dynamic ip on Veriz*n's new Fi*S (fiber optic) service. The
> new service uses PPPoe - not a problem, or so I t
> So, this problem has me stumped. I've tried playing around with the
> PPPoe options in /etc/ppp/peers/dsl-provider, and re-ran pppoeconf a
> couple times, but I can't get around the e-mail freeze. Does anybody
> else know what might cause a problem like this?
>
> TIA,
> Jacob
Try this in your d
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Howdy list,
I recently changed ISPs, away from static ips on a dsl line to a single
dynamic ip on Veriz*n's new Fi*S (fiber optic) service. The new service
uses PPPoe - not a problem, or so I thought - I have PPPoe on my
firewall.
Now, I have used PP
Yes, I could just use the router but a)I run a firewall and DHCP
server on my linux box and don't want to duplicate the functionality,
b) I wanted know why it doesn't work, because, hey, I leave a lot to
be desired and could use some improvement , and c) there's just
something cool about pl
Dmitri Kostioukov wrote:
Hello, I've recently started using a provider that needs pppoe and I'm having
problem configuring my box for it. My debian box acts as a router/firewall for
several other computers on the network.
It seems to connect fine through pppoe, gets an IP address and DNS serve
On Friday 10 February 2006 11:27, Dmitri Kostioukov wrote:
>Hello, I've recently started using a provider that needs pppoe and I'm
> having problem configuring my box for it. My debian box acts as a
> router/firewall for several other computers on the network.
>
>It seems to connect fine through pp
Hello, I've recently started using a provider that needs pppoe and I'm having
problem configuring my box for it. My debian box acts as a router/firewall for
several other computers on the network.
It seems to connect fine through pppoe, gets an IP address and DNS servers.
However, only 1 machine
Hi.
I have been having problems with authenticating with my ADSL
provider when i use kernel 2.4. When i use Kernel 2.2, (idepci, the
default kernel of the debian 3.0r1 distribution), it works fine...
The kernel is the 2.4.22, compiled using the debian default
procedures, with PPP/BS
Hi folks,
I use a woody - stable release for my router.
My isp is german -telekom and i use a dsl modem sold by them.
now having the modem plugged in for 3-4 days i get those messages:
Jun 16 18:07:18 kai-router pppoe[179]: Bogus PPPoE length field (1494)
the number in brakets differs from mess
* Reto ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Hi!
> I have just configured PPPoE on my Debian Sid. I finally managed to get it
> online. When starting plog, I get my current (dynamic) IP-adress (local and
> remote), and the primary+secondary DNS listed.
> But I cannot ping anything, I cannot get out. Ping
Hi!
I have just configured PPPoE on my Debian Sid. I finally managed to get it
online. When starting plog, I get my current (dynamic) IP-adress (local and
remote), and the primary+secondary DNS listed.
But I cannot ping anything, I cannot get out. Ping on myself (static
192 as well as dynam
Of course, it is not necessary to upgrade to woody in order to use
kernel 2.2.17. The woody kernel-source package will work fine, as well
as the tarball from linux.kernel.org.
Bob
On Mon, Nov 27, 2000 at 11:02:17AM -0800, Stan Kaufman wrote:
> In case I'm not the only one who has run into this p
In case I'm not the only one who has run into this problem, here's what
happened and what fixed things.
On my potato firewall box, I ran a custom 2.2.15 kernel with the stock
PPPoE package (Roaring Penguin v 1.0-1) from the Debian archive with
good results. The only problem was that for unclear re
41 matches
Mail list logo
