John Griffiths wrote:
Thanks :-)
Tried Susa once and really didn't like it... Mandrake's my choice for
rpm based distros. If Mandrake shipped with apt it would be the ultimate
linux distro :-)
At the risk of a holy war, Mandrake is like running Debian Testing, stuff
doesn't ALWAYS work
John Griffiths wrote:
At 08:30 PM 5/16/01 -0500, DvB wrote:
I was going to burn myself a copy of potato to see how much the
install's improved since I last ran it and noticed there are not one,
not two, but _three_ freaking iso images (binary-i386-1 thru 3.iso) out
there. Are they all really
MaD dUCK wrote:
also sprach DvB (on Wed, 16 May 2001 08:30:15PM -0500):
I was going to burn myself a copy of potato to see how much the
install's improved since I last ran it and noticed there are not one,
not two, but _three_ freaking iso images (binary-i386-1 thru 3.iso) out
there. Are the
also sprach DvB (on Wed, 16 May 2001 08:30:15PM -0500):
> I was going to burn myself a copy of potato to see how much the
> install's improved since I last ran it and noticed there are not one,
> not two, but _three_ freaking iso images (binary-i386-1 thru 3.iso) out
> there. Are they all really
At 08:30 PM 5/16/01 -0500, DvB wrote:
>I was going to burn myself a copy of potato to see how much the
>install's improved since I last ran it and noticed there are not one,
>not two, but _three_ freaking iso images (binary-i386-1 thru 3.iso) out
>there. Are they all really necessary? Or can I i
I was going to burn myself a copy of potato to see how much the
install's improved since I last ran it and noticed there are not one,
not two, but _three_ freaking iso images (binary-i386-1 thru 3.iso) out
there. Are they all really necessary? Or can I install off one and add
packages via apt a
6 matches
Mail list logo
