In early July, when Anthony first asked the question below, I sort of
kept my eye out for an answer or two on it:
"John Anthony Kazos Jr." wrote:
>
> Out of sheerest curiosity, since I'm not having any problems with woody beyond
> the X/gpm mouse grabbing and X->fb corruption, is there a way to d
Out of sheerest curiosity, since I'm not having any problems with woody beyond
the X/gpm mouse grabbing and X->fb corruption, is there a way to downgrade from
woody to potato, from woody to slink, and from potato to slink? I would assume a
forced apt-get dist-upgrade with appropriate lines in sourc
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Takuo KITAME) writes:
> RM> I'm running emacs 19.34, compiled back in Sep 1996, on Linux, Solaris and
> RM> IRIX64. I haven't found a definitive answer as to whether or not it has
> RM> Y2K problems.
>
> RM> Does anybody know if timezone.el is the only problem?
>
> for example
>>>>> On Wed, 29 Dec 1999 09:52:22 -0700 (MST)
>>>>> "RM" == Rick Macdonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote...
RM> On 29 Dec 1999, Takuo KITAME wrote:
>> I think that emacs19 19.34(potato/slink) and emacs20 20.3(slink) has the y2k
>> prob
On 29 Dec 1999, Takuo KITAME wrote:
> I think that emacs19 19.34(potato/slink) and emacs20 20.3(slink) has the y2k
> problem in lisp/timezone.el.
> Are package maintainer or anybody working for fix this? or already fixed?
>
> Here is the fixed timezone.el.
> http://master.
Hello.
I think that emacs19 19.34(potato/slink) and emacs20 20.3(slink) has the y2k
problem in lisp/timezone.el.
Are package maintainer or anybody working for fix this? or already fixed?
Here is the fixed timezone.el.
http://master.debian.org/~kitame/tmp/timezone.el
(Thanks TSUCHIYA Masatoshi
Ron Farrer wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Is it possible to downgrade from potato back to slink?
>
---end quoted text---
Short answer: no
Long answer: Not without reinstalling from scratch.
You can never go back...
--
Regards,
Steve
Debian GNU/Linux Because software support is free, timely,
Hello,
Is it possible to downgrade from potato back to slink?
TIA,
Ron
--
=
= Ronald Burnett Farrer =
=
- "mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]" -
- "http://www.magnesium.net/~rbf/"; -
--
Khalid EZZARAOUI wrote:
>
> I read before that potato is a duplication of slink, and the potato's
> tree are just link to slink.
>
> And each time a new application is generated to potato the link to this
> become a new file.
>
> So if this is true, why using slink+potato but not just potato in
I read before that potato is a duplication of slink, and the potato's
tree are just link to slink.
And each time a new application is generated to potato the link to this
become a new file.
So if this is true, why using slink+potato but not just potato in
apt-source?
in fact i understood
What version of netscape are you running? I am running the Debian
packaged 4.08 (smotif) on a potato system and it has been extremely
stable. I had problems with 4.51 and the downgrade of navigator to an
earlier version made quite a difference.
Gnome applications are a different story, however (
Greetings!
This question might be stupid, but...
Is there a sensible way for downgrading from unstable
distribution back to the stable one.
This is because web browsing is very important part
of my work and Netscape keeps on crashing on potato
(propably due to the new glibc?)
Also any other sol
12 matches
Mail list logo
