top-posting (was Re: Xpra)

2025-04-28 Thread Jonathan Dowland
Could you please stop top-posting? Thank you! -- Please do not CC me for listmail. 👱🏻 Jonathan Dowland ✎j...@debian.org 🔗 https://jmtd.net

Testing posting to the list

2025-02-06 Thread Russell S.
I'm trying to make it so that I can seemlessly post to the list from the group view in Gnus as if I was posting to the group. -- this is my clever sig.

Re: Testing posting to list from Gnus

2025-02-06 Thread Andrew M.A. Cater
am > and has been refused because: > > this hierarchy accepts posts only from registered users. > You can register for posting by subscribing to the linux-g...@lists.bofh.it > mailing list. You can do so by sending a message with "subscribe" in the > body at the linux-gate

Re: Testing posting to the list from Gnus

2025-02-06 Thread Moderation Robot
linux.debian.user is a moderated newsgroup in gateway with a mailing list. Your article has been examined by the automatic moderation program and has been refused because: this hierarchy accepts posts only from registered users. You can register for posting by subscribing to the linux-g

Re: Testing posting to list from Gnus

2025-02-06 Thread Moderation Robot
linux.debian.user is a moderated newsgroup in gateway with a mailing list. Your article has been examined by the automatic moderation program and has been refused because: this hierarchy accepts posts only from registered users. You can register for posting by subscribing to the linux-g

Re: OT: Top Posting

2024-05-15 Thread gene heskett
On 5/15/24 10:50, Nicolas George wrote: Cindy Sue Causey (12024-05-15): PS Afterthought is that email signatures are another of that widely accepted netiquette set of standards. You can add the “Re: ” to that list. It is the sequence of four octets 0x52, 0x65, 0x3a, 0x20, and nothing else. T

Re: OT: Top Posting

2024-05-15 Thread James H. H. Lampert
them. . . . Actually, it isn't necessarily the user's fault. Thanks to the "business standard," (and think about the initials) of top-posting over the complete, unpared quote of the entire thread, there are an awful lot of email readers (and especially webmail interfaces) th

Re: OT: Top Posting

2024-05-15 Thread Henning Follmann
pro and con in previous discussions, and there is no need to repeat them. It is a matter of personal choice though I have to admit I feel a bit emboldened by the posting guidelines. And in my experience a polite question goes a long way with most civilized people. You can ignore my request, well

Re: OT: Top Posting

2024-05-15 Thread Nicolas George
Cindy Sue Causey (12024-05-15): > PS Afterthought is that email signatures are another of that widely > accepted netiquette set of standards. You can add the “Re: ” to that list. It is the sequence of four octets 0x52, 0x65, 0x3a, 0x20, and nothing else. The MUAs who write “RE: ” are wrong. The

Re: OT: Top Posting

2024-05-15 Thread gene heskett
On 5/15/24 10:06, Nicolas George wrote: Cindy Sue Causey (12024-05-15): Best as I was able to discern from the Net [0], 72 characters is the magic number for line length because 4 extra characters are added to both ends when e.g. git processes submissions. Makes good common sense to me. Git is

Re: OT: Top Posting

2024-05-15 Thread Greg Wooledge
On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 09:46:08AM -0400, Cindy Sue Causey wrote: > Best as I was able to discern from the Net [0], 72 characters is the > magic number for line length because 4 extra characters are added to > both ends when e.g. git processes submissions. Makes good common sense > to me. > > PS I

Re: OT: Top Posting

2024-05-15 Thread Cindy Sue Causey
-Original Message- From: Greg Wooledge To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: OT: Top Posting Date: 05/14/24 13:41:17 On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 05:01:31PM +, fxkl4...@protonmail.com wrote: > how many times has this top post crap been dug up > don't y'all have any

Re: OT: Top Posting

2024-05-15 Thread Nicolas George
Cindy Sue Causey (12024-05-15): > Best as I was able to discern from the Net [0], 72 characters is the > magic number for line length because 4 extra characters are added to > both ends when e.g. git processes submissions. Makes good common sense > to me. Git is an order of magnitude younger than

Re: OT: Top Posting

2024-05-15 Thread Cindy Sue Causey
-Original Message- From: gene heskett To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: OT: Top Posting Date: 05/14/24 10:54:50 On 5/14/24 10:09, Richard wrote: Just because something isn't an official ISO standard doesn't mean it's not standard behavior. And how it relates

Markup in mail messages (was: Re: OT: Top Posting)

2024-05-14 Thread Max Nikulin
On 15/05/2024 02:32, Greg Wooledge wrote: On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 08:16:20PM +0200, Nicolas George wrote: Messages in Markdown in the Windows world? I have never seen it. [...] The only sensible interpretation I can come up with for why these asterisks were added is that they're being placed a

Re: OT: Top Posting

2024-05-14 Thread Larry Martell
can. There are dozens of them. >>> >>> > Am Di., 14. Mai 2024 um 15:57 Uhr schrieb Loris Bennett >>> > mailto:loris.benn...@fu-berlin.de>>: >>> > >>> > Hi Richard, >>> > >>> > Richard mailto:rrosn...@gmail.com

Re: OT: Top Posting

2024-05-14 Thread fxkl47BF
On Tue, 14 May 2024, Andy Smith wrote: > Hello, > > On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 05:01:31PM +, fxkl4...@protonmail.com wrote: >> don't y'all have any thing better to do > > You must be new here. sorta i've only been using versions of linux since the early 90's :) downloaded it from an archie serve

Re: OT: Top Posting

2024-05-14 Thread Andy Smith
Hello, On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 05:01:31PM +, fxkl4...@protonmail.com wrote: > don't y'all have any thing better to do You must be new here. Get used to reading with a "mark thread read" key in your MUA of choice, is my best advice. Thanks, Andy -- https://bitfolk.com/ -- No-nonsense VPS h

Re: OT: Top Posting

2024-05-14 Thread debian-user
Greg Wooledge wrote: > In this particular instance, we've got a person from the second > culture who seems to have no idea that other cultures exist, or that > a mailing list might not adhere to their own expectations. This > person is acting belligerantly, and will not listen to gentle > remind

Re: OT: Top Posting

2024-05-14 Thread Greg Wooledge
On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 08:16:20PM +0200, Nicolas George wrote: > Messages in Markdown in the Windows world? I have never seen it. I can't be sure where they're coming from exactly, but every once in a while I see messages on debian-user, bug-bash or help-bash which have extra asterisk characters

Re: OT: Top Posting

2024-05-14 Thread Jeffrey Walton
>> choice of email agents cannot do that, its time to switch to an agent >> that can. There are dozens of them. >> >> > Am Di., 14. Mai 2024 um 15:57 Uhr schrieb Loris Bennett >> > mailto:loris.benn...@fu-berlin.de>>: >> > >> > Hi Rich

Re: OT: Top Posting

2024-05-14 Thread Karen Lewellen
the software in between cannot take, i.e. most of it. And the “(s)” tells us which culture is more efficient and why. The second culture are Windows users who grew up with Microsoft products in their school or workplace. In this culture, top-posting is the norm, and inline quoting is nigh impossib

Re: OT: Top Posting

2024-05-14 Thread Andrew M.A. Cater
On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 05:01:31PM +, fxkl4...@protonmail.com wrote: > how many times has this top post crap been dug up > don't y'all have any thing better to do > i know > how about some real debian issues > Hi, Have a quick look at the Debian-user FAQ posted each month and the Debian Cod

Re: OT: Top Posting

2024-05-14 Thread Nicolas George
t. And the “(s)” tells us which culture is more efficient and why. > The second culture are Windows users who grew up with Microsoft products > in their school or workplace. In this culture, top-posting is the norm, > and inline quoting is nigh impossible. Messages are often sent in ei

Re: OT: Top Posting

2024-05-14 Thread James H. H. Lampert
On 5/14/24 10:41 AM, Greg Wooledge wrote: We have a clash of two cultures here. More than just *nix vs. M$. In business communications by email, the norm is to quote the *entire* thread, every time, without paring anything down, purely for the sake of CYA. As such, top-posting is the only

Re: OT: Top Posting

2024-05-14 Thread Greg Wooledge
ad and composed on a terminal, or a terminal emulator. Characters are displayed in a fixed-width font. ASCII art is possible, albeit frowned upon as juvenile. The second culture are Windows users who grew up with Microsoft products in their school or workplace. In this culture, top-posting is the

Re: OT: Top Posting

2024-05-14 Thread fxkl47BF
how many times has this top post crap been dug up don't y'all have any thing better to do i know how about some real debian issues

Re: OT: Top Posting (was: Dovecot correct ownership for logs)

2024-05-14 Thread tomas
On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 04:08:19PM +0200, Richard wrote: > Just because something isn't an official ISO standard doesn't mean it's not > standard behavior. And how it relates to this mailing list? It's called a > setting. Most people prefer inline quoting around here (I know I do). That's because

Re: OT: Top Posting

2024-05-14 Thread Richard
u-berlin.de>>: > > > > Hi Richard, > > > > Richard mailto:rrosn...@gmail.com>> writes: > > > > > "Top posting" (writing the answer above the text that's being > replied > > > to) is literally industry s

Re: OT: Top Posting

2024-05-14 Thread gene heskett
Richard mailto:rrosn...@gmail.com>> writes: > "Top posting" (writing the answer above the text that's being replied > to) is literally industry standard behavior. Can you provide a link to the standard you are referring to? Assuming such a standard exi

Re: OT: Top Posting (was: Dovecot correct ownership for logs)

2024-05-14 Thread Richard
t; > Richard writes: > > > "Top posting" (writing the answer above the text that's being replied > > to) is literally industry standard behavior. > > Can you provide a link to the standard you are referring to? > > Assuming such a standard exists, how

OT: Top Posting (was: Dovecot correct ownership for logs)

2024-05-14 Thread Loris Bennett
Hi Richard, Richard writes: > "Top posting" (writing the answer above the text that's being replied > to) is literally industry standard behavior. Can you provide a link to the standard you are referring to? Assuming such a standard exists, how would it apply to this

Re: Banning a user from posting to Debian lists

2024-02-19 Thread Charles Kroeger
just checking -- CK

Banning a user from posting to Debian lists

2024-02-19 Thread Andrew M.A. Cater
[Also posted to commun...@debian.org / listmas...@lists.debian.org] Subject: Banning of a user from posting to Debian lists === As noted in the monthly FAQ, among the events that can take place on Debian lists as a result of breach of the

Re: OT: Forwarding and top posting (was: Re: OT: Pedantic, yet wrong)

2023-06-23 Thread Andy Smith
Hello, On Thu, Jun 22, 2023 at 04:24:47PM -0700, Manphiz wrote: > Personally I don't have a strong preference either way, but would like > to hear more opinions on this. The complaint about a top-posted forwarded message just because it had a contextual hint at the top, seemed excessive to me. I

OT: Forwarding and top posting (was: Re: OT: Pedantic, yet wrong)

2023-06-22 Thread Manphiz
David Christensen writes: > On 6/22/23 03:28, Ottavio Caruso wrote: >> Am 21/06/2023 um 15:46 schrieb to...@tuxteam.de: > >>> ... top posting ... > >> ... When the message is forwarded ("Weitergeleitet", ... you have no >> other choice than to

[OT] Re: Android email client that does bottom posting

2022-04-28 Thread didier gaumet
Le jeudi 28 avril 2022 à 12:41 +, Keith Bainbridge a écrit : > Good Evening All > > I top posted last night, in error.  Sorry > > I have asked the devs where the bottom posting setting has gone. Hello, (K9 Mail) Account Settings > Sending mail > Reply after quoted text

Android email client that does bottom posting

2022-04-28 Thread Keith Bainbridge
Good Evening All I top posted last night, in error. Sorry I have asked the devs where the bottom posting setting has gone. -- All the best Keith Bainbridge keithrbaugro...@gmail.com Sent from my aPhone. Please excuse my brevity.

Re: Subject: Mr. Dan Ritter, why is it that you appear to be posting your POV on my posts? Are you a covert agent of the anti-FSF cabal, trying to subvert something "positive for FSF, but detrimenta

2021-03-31 Thread Joe Pfeiffer
Dan Ritter writes: > Laura Smith wrote: >> On Wednesday, March 31st, 2021 at 18:28, Dan Ritter >> wrote: >> >> > That was the subject line of a message I just received from a >> > - I am not a covert agent of an anti-FSF cabal [...] >> >> Unless you were a very bad covert agent, you would

Re: Subject: Mr. Dan Ritter, why is it that you appear to be posting your POV on my posts? Are you a covert agent of the anti-FSF cabal, trying to subvert something "positive for FSF, but detrimental

2021-03-31 Thread Dan Ritter
Laura Smith wrote: > On Wednesday, March 31st, 2021 at 18:28, Dan Ritter > wrote: > > > That was the subject line of a message I just received from a > > - I am not a covert agent of an anti-FSF cabal [...] > > Unless you were a very bad covert agent, you would say that, wouldn't you ;). Co

Re: Subject: Mr. Dan Ritter, why is it that you appear to be posting your POV on my posts? Are you a covert agent of the anti-FSF cabal, trying to subvert something "positive for FSF, but detrimental

2021-03-31 Thread Laura Smith
On Wednesday, March 31st, 2021 at 18:28, Dan Ritter wrote: > That was the subject line of a message I just received from a > - I am not a covert agent of an anti-FSF cabal [...] Unless you were a very bad covert agent, you would say that, wouldn't you ;).

Subject: Mr. Dan Ritter, why is it that you appear to be posting your POV on my posts? Are you a covert agent of the anti-FSF cabal, trying to subvert something "positive for FSF, but detrimental for

2021-03-31 Thread Dan Ritter
That was the subject line of a message I just received from a Debian-user member. In case anyone is confused: - I write my point of view because that's the one I have - I am not a covert agent of an anti-FSF cabal, to the best of my knowledge. - I have no idea what 'trying to subvert someth

Re: Top-posting (was Re: how to test disk for bad sector)

2020-08-30 Thread Charles Curley
On Sun, 30 Aug 2020 09:14:16 -0700 Charlie Gibbs wrote: > If someone can't be bothered to take the time to write a readable > message, I can't be bothered to take the time to decipher it. On the other tentacle, this sort of thing is usually the province of newbies. I think it would help to refer

Re: Top-posting

2020-08-30 Thread Felix Miata
Charlie Gibbs composed on 2020-08-30 09:14 (UTC-0700): > On Sun, 30 Aug 2020 16:30:01 +0200 Charles Curley wrote: >> On Sun, 30 Aug 2020 14:02:48 + Andy Smith wrote: >>> Between your top posting and the HTML mails, I find it very >>> difficult to read your

Top-posting (was Re: how to test disk for bad sector)

2020-08-30 Thread Charlie Gibbs
On Sun, 30 Aug 2020 16:30:01 +0200 Charles Curley wrote: > On Sun, 30 Aug 2020 14:02:48 + > Andy Smith wrote: > >> Between your top posting and the HTML mails, I find it very >> difficult to read your emails so I mostly haven't bothered. > > Hear, hear.

Re: [not-so-offlist] posting style [was Re: Using .XCompose]

2020-07-07 Thread davidson
On Wed, 8 Jul 2020 Ajith R wrote: Hi David, Debian conformant style looks like this instead: Do I understand the style correctly now? LOL. Probably not. Maybe I should have allowed your discovery of the mailing list's quoting conventions to take its natural course. It was maybe silly

Re: [offlist] posting style [was Re: Using .XCompose]

2020-07-07 Thread Andrei POPESCU
On Mi, 08 iul 20, 02:52:02, Ajith R wrote: > > Do I understand the style correctly now? Mostly. Think of it as "conversational" style, with the reply following the portion of text it addresses. Other text should be removed, unless it provides useful context (would your message make sense if re

Re: [offlist] posting style [was Re: Using .XCompose]

2020-07-07 Thread Ajith R
Hi David, >>> Debian conformant style looks like this instead: >>> Do I understand the style correctly now? BTW, a query about how the original message is quoted with '<'. Is it done by hand or does any email clients do it automatically?  Is it necessary that each line s marked with '<'? Or

Re: (OT) Top Posting (was Re: Gimp Babl too old)

2018-09-17 Thread Ben Finney
Kenneth Parker writes: > I have a special issue: Using Gmail on a Phone or Tablet (I have > both). Both of those devices lack a proper keyboard. That makes them unsuitable for composing anything but very short messages, and wholly unsuitable for editing text. > Seriously, how do others of you

Re: (OT) Top Posting (was Re: Gimp Babl too old)

2018-09-14 Thread Anders Andersson
a computer. Using an inferior tool is no excuse to inconvenience others. My pet peeve here is when people try to use the Stack Exchange app or whatever, and excuse the lousy formatting on "I'm on the phone", but thanks for pointing out another one: gmail top posting! It's bad

(OT) Top Posting (was Re: Gimp Babl too old)

2018-09-13 Thread Kenneth Parker
On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 10:07 PM Ric Moore wrote: > > > > Same reason some people top post. They just ignore the conventions. > I have a special issue: Using Gmail on a Phone or Tablet (I have both). I have yet to find a Straightforward way to Snip lots of lines, using the Android App. Als

Re: trouble posting

2018-05-24 Thread Brad Rogers
On Thu, 24 May 2018 12:16:20 -0500 Glenn Holmer wrote: Hello Glenn, >Can anyone help me diagnose this? Probably not, given the lack of information supplied. -- Regards _ / ) "The blindingly obvious is / _)radnever immediately apparent" You're the psychotic

Re: trouble posting

2018-05-24 Thread Joe
eep trying, use that address more. When I started posting here, most of my early posts disappeared, but eventually they were all getting through. I suspect an undocumented anti-spam feature. -- Joe

trouble posting

2018-05-24 Thread Glenn Holmer
I've been subscribed to this list from a different address for some time and receive messages properly, but the few posts I make from that address never appear on the list. Can anyone help me diagnose this? -- Glenn Holmer (Linux registered user #16682) "After the vintage season came the aftermat

Re: Posting picture files

2016-05-13 Thread cbannister
On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 07:52:46PM +0100, Brian wrote: > On Wed 11 May 2016 at 06:36:43 +1200, cbannis...@slingshot.co.nz wrote: > > > On Sun, May 01, 2016 at 11:57:34AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote: > > > On Sunday 01 May 2016 11:07:39 Sven Arvidsson wrote: > > > > > > > > "Do not submit an atta

Re: Posting picture files

2016-05-10 Thread Brian
On Wed 11 May 2016 at 06:36:43 +1200, cbannis...@slingshot.co.nz wrote: > On Sun, May 01, 2016 at 11:57:34AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote: > > On Sunday 01 May 2016 11:07:39 Sven Arvidsson wrote: > > > > > > "Do not submit an attachment larger than 10 KiB. Consider using > > > paste.debian.ne

Re: Posting picture files

2016-05-10 Thread cbannister
On Sun, May 01, 2016 at 11:57:34AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote: > On Sunday 01 May 2016 11:07:39 Sven Arvidsson wrote: > > > > "Do not submit an attachment larger than 10 KiB. Consider using > > paste.debian.net and including a link in your post." > > > > From https://wiki.debian.org/DebianMa

Re: Posting picture files

2016-05-10 Thread cbannister
On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 12:41:10PM -0700, Gary Roach wrote: > > > You know, I thought I had tried switching themes with out success. I just > tried it again and the Oxygen theme cleared up the problem. So this is the solution to a problem in another thread? :/ -- The media's the most powerful en

Re: Posting picture files

2016-05-03 Thread Bob Holtzman
On Mon, May 02, 2016 at 04:38:53PM -0700, Gary Roach wrote: > You know, I just looked at http://paste.debian,net. The site seems to be > more for pasting code snippets than anything else. While there is nothing > wrong with this, I don't see why they don't just paste the code directly > into their

Re: Posting picture files

2016-05-03 Thread Gary Roach
thing about the posting problems. I seem to struck a nerve somewhere. I think that the discussion on attachments, file sizes and rejected email practices has been of some value in itself. Thank you everyone for your participation. Gary R.

Re: Posting picture files

2016-05-03 Thread Dan Ritter
On Mon, May 02, 2016 at 07:08:07PM -0500, John Hasler wrote: > Ralph Sanchez writes: > > I guess a lot of those 2.1 million customers probably live in very > > rural areas where maybe other forms aren't available, or the cost to > > lay wire would be more then they have. My thinking is, we have GPS

Re: Posting picture files

2016-05-03 Thread heqami...@runbox.com
On 05/03/2016 05:18 AM, Gary Roach wrote: > I still haven't found a solution for the disappearance of all of my > desktop icons. They are replaced with little transparent squares. They > still work though. Try to change the theme you are using and/or install some new themes. and/or install a d

Re: Posting picture files

2016-05-03 Thread Brian
On Tue 03 May 2016 at 07:51:29 -0400, Felix Miata wrote: > Brian composed on 2016-05-03 12:08 (UTC+0100): > > >On Mon 02 May 2016 at 23:43:45 -0400, Felix Miata wrote: > > >>thousands of mailing list subscribers. This list's subscribers can see in > >

Re: Posting picture files

2016-05-03 Thread Felix Miata
Brian composed on 2016-05-03 12:08 (UTC+0100): On Mon 02 May 2016 at 23:43:45 -0400, Felix Miata wrote: thousands of mailing list subscribers. This list's subscribers can see in the list posting rules that binary attachments are not to be expected unless of nominal size, thus can feel

Re: Posting picture files

2016-05-03 Thread Brian
ling list subscribers. This list's subscribers can see in > the list posting rules that binary attachments are not to be expected unless > of nominal size, thus can feel safe their disk space won't be wasted, and Avoid sending large attachments. is the advice: https://www.debi

Re: Posting picture files

2016-05-03 Thread Lisi Reisz
On Tuesday 03 May 2016 04:18:59 Gary Roach wrote: > I still haven't found a solution for the disappearance of all of my > desktop icons. They are replaced with little transparent squares. They > still work though. This problem got lost. I should start a new thread and explain it clearly, starti

Re: Posting picture files

2016-05-02 Thread Felix Miata
Gene Heskett composed on 2016-05-01 11:57 (UTC-0400): So I'd like to prose a compromise that recognizes the folks still on dialup and at dialup speeds. Possibly paying by the minute for access. Some pay by the byte even with high bandwidth. Not attaching binaries is about not being wasteful g

Re: Posting picture files

2016-05-02 Thread Felix Miata
ee in the list posting rules that binary attachments are not to be expected unless of nominal size, thus can feel safe their disk space won't be wasted, and internet bandwidth won't be wasted, on things a select few have interest in or will be opening. It's little different than th

Re: Posting picture files

2016-05-02 Thread Gary Roach
On 05/02/2016 05:04 PM, Lisi Reisz wrote: On Tuesday 03 May 2016 00:38:53 Gary Roach wrote: Someone needs to figure out a way to handle this without penalizing the rest of us. "The rest of us" don't have any desire to send pictures and are not being penalised. Lisi I wouldn't send pictures e

Re: Posting picture files

2016-05-02 Thread John Hasler
Ralph Sanchez writes: > I guess a lot of those 2.1 million customers probably live in very > rural areas where maybe other forms aren't available, or the cost to > lay wire would be more then they have. My thinking is, we have GPS > that works nearly (ok maybe not) everywhere you'd go and want > in

Re: Posting picture files

2016-05-02 Thread Lisi Reisz
On Tuesday 03 May 2016 00:38:53 Gary Roach wrote: > Someone needs to figure out a way to handle this without > penalizing the rest of us. "The rest of us" don't have any desire to send pictures and are not being penalised. Lisi

Re: Posting picture files

2016-05-02 Thread Ralph Sanchez
On the subject of Dialup, and this is me speaking for just me, but I'd rather have to walk five blocks everytime I need internet then spend 20 a month on dial up :/ I guess a lot of those 2.1 million customers probably live in very rural areas where maybe other forms aren't available, or the cost t

Re: Posting picture files

2016-05-02 Thread Gary Roach
On 05/02/2016 07:01 AM, Gene Heskett wrote: On Monday 02 May 2016 06:18:02 Vincent Lefevre wrote: On 2016-04-30 23:20:07 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote: On Saturday 30 April 2016 21:12:00 Gary Roach wrote: I understand that I should not use attachments on debian-user or send anything other than pl

Re: Posting picture files

2016-05-02 Thread Lisi Reisz
On Monday 02 May 2016 15:01:12 Gene Heskett wrote: > On Monday 02 May 2016 06:18:02 Vincent Lefevre wrote: > > On 2016-04-30 23:20:07 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote: > > > On Saturday 30 April 2016 21:12:00 Gary Roach wrote: > > > > I understand that I should not use attachments on debian-user or > > >

Re: Posting picture files

2016-05-02 Thread Gene Heskett
On Monday 02 May 2016 06:18:02 Vincent Lefevre wrote: > On 2016-04-30 23:20:07 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote: > > On Saturday 30 April 2016 21:12:00 Gary Roach wrote: > > > I understand that I should not use attachments on debian-user or > > > send anything other than plain text files. This leaves me

Re: Sorry. :-( Re: Posting picture files

2016-05-02 Thread Brian
On Mon 02 May 2016 at 08:44:53 +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > On Sun, May 01, 2016 at 09:59:13AM -0700, Gary Roach wrote: > > [...] > > > That coupled with the fact that this list just throws rejects into > > the bit bucket [...] > > I doubt that part. Especially having already received rejec

Re: Posting picture files

2016-05-02 Thread Vincent Lefevre
On 2016-04-30 23:20:07 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote: > On Saturday 30 April 2016 21:12:00 Gary Roach wrote: > > > I understand that I should not use attachments on debian-user or send > > anything other than plain text files. This leaves me with a problem if > > I wish to post a screen shot. I have b

Re: Sorry. :-( Re: Posting picture files

2016-05-02 Thread Gary Roach
On 05/01/2016 11:44 PM, to...@tuxteam.de wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, May 01, 2016 at 09:59:13AM -0700, Gary Roach wrote: [...] That coupled with the fact that this list just throws rejects into the bit bucket [...] I doubt that part. Especially having already

Re: Sorry. :-( Re: Posting picture files

2016-05-01 Thread tomas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, May 01, 2016 at 09:59:13AM -0700, Gary Roach wrote: [...] > That coupled with the fact that this list just throws rejects into > the bit bucket [...] I doubt that part. Especially having already received rejects from some Debian list due to

Re: Sorry. :-( Re: Posting picture files

2016-05-01 Thread Gary Roach
On 05/01/2016 10:38 AM, Lisi Reisz wrote: On Sunday 01 May 2016 17:59:13 Gary Roach wrote: Dial up or no dial up I really think Debian needs to loosen up a bit on the site restrictions. Why? Most people manage fine. If you would only answer the questions you are asked, you would get more help

Re: Posting picture files

2016-05-01 Thread Richard Hector
On 02/05/16 03:57, Gene Heskett wrote: > So I'd like to prose a compromise that recognizes the folks still > on dialup and at dialup speeds. Possibly paying by the minute for > access. > > Accept the attachment, but strip it from the message that goes > back out to the list and store it on paste

Re: Sorry. :-( Re: Posting picture files

2016-05-01 Thread Sven Arvidsson
On Sun, 2016-05-01 at 09:59 -0700, Gary Roach wrote: > I need to re-read Gene Haskett's suggestion again and try to > impliment  > it. Dial up or no dial up I really think Debian needs to loosen up a > bit  > on the site restrictions. You could probably file a bug about reject notices. As for the

Re: Posting picture files

2016-05-01 Thread Siard
On Sat, 30 Apr 2016 18:12:00 -0700, Gary Roach wrote: > I understand that I should not use attachments on debian-user or send > anything other than plain text files. This leaves me with a problem > if I wish to post a screen shot. I have been told that debian has a > paste bin. Does anyone know th

Re: Sorry. :-( Re: Posting picture files

2016-05-01 Thread Lisi Reisz
On Sunday 01 May 2016 17:59:13 Gary Roach wrote: > Dial up or no dial up I really think Debian needs to loosen up a bit > on the site restrictions. Why? Most people manage fine. If you would only answer the questions you are asked, you would get more help faster. Lisi

Re: Sorry. :-( Re: Posting picture files

2016-05-01 Thread Gary Roach
On 05/01/2016 04:46 AM, Lisi Reisz wrote: On Sunday 01 May 2016 12:33:18 Lisi Reisz wrote: On Sunday 01 May 2016 02:12:00 Gary Roach wrote: I understand that I should not use attachments on debian-user or send anything other than plain text files. I just sent a screenshot half an hour ago and

Re: Posting picture files

2016-05-01 Thread Gene Heskett
On Sunday 01 May 2016 11:07:39 Sven Arvidsson wrote: > On Sun, 2016-05-01 at 10:39 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote: > > > I tried sending a screenshot 25 minutes ago.  It has not so far > > > > turned > > > > > up. But another email I sent 5 minutes ago has turned up.  Whilst > > > Debian Users list cer

Re: Posting picture files

2016-05-01 Thread Lisi Reisz
On Sunday 01 May 2016 16:07:39 Sven Arvidsson wrote: > On Sun, 2016-05-01 at 10:39 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote: > > > I tried sending a screenshot 25 minutes ago.  It has not so far > > > > turned > > > > > up. But another email I sent 5 minutes ago has turned up.  Whilst > > > Debian Users list cert

Re: Posting picture files

2016-05-01 Thread Sven Arvidsson
On Sun, 2016-05-01 at 10:39 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote: > > I tried sending a screenshot 25 minutes ago.  It has not so far > turned > > up. But another email I sent 5 minutes ago has turned up.  Whilst > > Debian Users list certainly accepts attachments, it does look as > > though it doesn't like s

Re: Posting picture files

2016-05-01 Thread Gene Heskett
On Sunday 01 May 2016 07:28:40 Lisi Reisz wrote: > On Sunday 01 May 2016 02:12:00 Gary Roach wrote: > > I understand that I should not use attachments on debian-user or > > send anything other than plain text files. > > I tried sending a screenshot 25 minutes ago. It has not so far turned > up. B

Sorry. :-( Re: Posting picture files

2016-05-01 Thread Lisi Reisz
On Sunday 01 May 2016 12:33:18 Lisi Reisz wrote: > On Sunday 01 May 2016 02:12:00 Gary Roach wrote: > > I understand that I should not use attachments on debian-user or send > > anything other than plain text files. > > I just sent a screenshot half an hour ago and it has not arrived, but > another

Re: Posting picture files

2016-05-01 Thread Lisi Reisz
On Sunday 01 May 2016 02:12:00 Gary Roach wrote: > I understand that I should not use attachments on debian-user or send > anything other than plain text files. I just sent a screenshot half an hour ago and it has not arrived, but another email I sent twenty minutes later has arrived. Although s

Re: Posting picture files

2016-05-01 Thread Lisi Reisz
On Sunday 01 May 2016 02:12:00 Gary Roach wrote: > I understand that I should not use attachments on debian-user or send > anything other than plain text files. I tried sending a screenshot 25 minutes ago. It has not so far turned up. But another email I sent 5 minutes ago has turned up. Whils

Re: Posting picture files

2016-04-30 Thread Gene Heskett
On Saturday 30 April 2016 21:12:00 Gary Roach wrote: > I understand that I should not use attachments on debian-user or send > anything other than plain text files. This leaves me with a problem if > I wish to post a screen shot. I have been told that debian has a paste > bin. Does anyone know the

Posting picture files

2016-04-30 Thread Gary Roach
I understand that I should not use attachments on debian-user or send anything other than plain text files. This leaves me with a problem if I wish to post a screen shot. I have been told that debian has a paste bin. Does anyone know the url for that bin. Gary R

Re: Posting a message on all desktops

2016-02-02 Thread Himanshu Shekhar
I haven't tried yet, but shutdown -k "message" should work. However, the message would not flash on the GUI screen of all systems. Moreover, all users need to be connected to same host. Rather, you could create on indicator, with python backend, listening messages from a particular socket or port o

Re: Posting a message on all desktops

2016-02-02 Thread Timothy Marion
Would shutdown -k work ? On Sat, 2016-01-30 at 22:34 -0300, Renaud OLGIATI wrote: > On Sat, 30 Jan 2016 18:59:13 -0500 > ken wrote: > > > > Is there a way for a system admin to post a message on the desktops of > > > all the machines on a LAN ? > > > If all the desktops are just terminals (tex

Re: Posting a message on all desktops

2016-01-30 Thread Teemu Likonen
Renaud OLGIATI [2016-01-30 16:33:31-03] wrote: > Is there a way for a system admin to post a message on the desktops of > all the machines on a LAN ? I'm doing the same thing in a network where every machine gets their IP through DHCP. The network is scanned with nmap for open ssh servers. Luckil

Re: Posting a message on all desktops

2016-01-30 Thread Ron
On Sat, 30 Jan 2016 18:59:13 -0500 ken wrote: > > Is there a way for a system admin to post a message on the desktops of all > > the machines on a LAN ? > If all the desktops are just terminals (text), you could use "wall". > But they're probably not. (?) No, they are all GUI > You could pu

Re: Posting a message on all desktops

2016-01-30 Thread ken
On 01/30/2016 02:33 PM, Renaud (Ron) OLGIATI wrote: Is there a way for a system admin to post a message on the desktops of all the machines on a LAN ? Cheers, Ron. If all the desktops are just terminals (text), you could use "wall". But they're probably not. (?) You could put the desire

Posting a message on all desktops

2016-01-30 Thread Ron
Is there a way for a system admin to post a message on the desktops of all the machines on a LAN ? Cheers, Ron. -- La marine est un art, une science, et un snobisme. -- Roger Glachant

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >