Re: poll: managing high volumes of list mail effectively

2004-10-22 Thread Manoj Srivastava
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 05:36:04 +0200, martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > also sprach Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.17.0837 > +0200]: >> Gnus can handle all that, > Nice to know, but I ain't switchin' operating system. ;^> >> Additionally, it has an adaptive scoring mechan

Re: poll: managing high volumes of list mail effectively

2004-10-18 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.17.0837 +0200]: > Gnus can handle all that, Nice to know, but I ain't switchin' operating system. ;^> > Additionally, it has an adaptive scoring mechanism, that learns > about topics you are interested in, and topics and posters that > one

Re: poll: managing high volumes of list mail effectively

2004-10-17 Thread Manoj Srivastava
On Fri, 15 Oct 2004 17:01:59 +0200, martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > I am subscribed to 237 mailing lists and even though my tools are > adequate, I still consider them suboptimal since I just hit 'delete' > on most threads. I have a server receive all my mail and procmail it > into t

Re: poll: managing high volumes of list mail effectively

2004-10-15 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Brian Kimball <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.15.1823 +0200]: > > I am subscribed to 237 mailing lists and even though my tools are > > Holy crap! > > How much time per day do you spend on all that mail? Too much. But as I said, I have good tools. For instance, crm114 and a custom neura

Re: poll: managing high volumes of list mail effectively

2004-10-15 Thread Brian Kimball
On Friday 15 October 2004 08:01 am, martin f krafft wrote: > I am subscribed to 237 mailing lists and even though my tools are Holy crap! How much time per day do you spend on all that mail? I'm trying to be as efficient as I can with my 19 mailing lists and I still spend too long on them. th

poll: managing high volumes of list mail effectively

2004-10-15 Thread martin f krafft
I am subscribed to 237 mailing lists and even though my tools are adequate, I still consider them suboptimal since I just hit 'delete' on most threads. I have a server receive all my mail and procmail it into topic folders. From there, five clients use offlineimap to keep a synchronised copy of the