Chris Fearnley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>[Removed debian-devel from the Cc: list as this is beyond Debian
>policy.]
Followed Bruce's distribution list, but thank you for the info.
>Have you looked at the Aladdin Ghostscript Free Public License? Peter
>Deutsch has thought a lot about these is
> It's difficult enough to promote freeware in industry with
> the common "lack of support" misperception. Combine this
I'd suggest that rather than "fixing" that with wierd licenses, you
just do better marketing. Works for us :-)
_Mark_ <[EMAIL PROTECTED
'Tom Julien wrote:'
>
>IMHO, a license like Qt's is long overdue. It makes a fine
>commercial product available to both X11 and Win32, yet it
>provides a great mechanism to promote freeware/open standards
>like Unix/X11 *over* propriety ones. Troll's reasoning for
>not allowing modified versions
Please note: the following is in no way intended as flame
to Bruce, Debian, or the FSF...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bruce Perens) writes:
>From: William Burrow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> While the Qt authors may have different concerns than Knuth does over
>> TeX, the idea may be the same: modified versi
From: William Burrow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> While the Qt authors may have different concerns than Knuth does over
> TeX, the idea may be the same: modified versions may reflect badly on
> Troll Tech.
I understand their concern, I just don't share it. Debian doesn't place
this sort of restriction
5 matches
Mail list logo
