Thanks pine 4.05 is installed but ...

1998-10-04 Thread Daniel Mashao
I have finally got pine 4.05 installed. I think it is helping me to dislike non-free software. Rigth now it is giving me messages I do not understand. It always complain that "Mailbox vulnerable - directory must have 1777 protection". I cannot figure out which directory it is complainin

Re: Installing pine 4.05

1998-10-02 Thread Santiago Vila Doncel
On Fri, 2 Oct 1998, Daniel Mashao wrote: > Anybody installed this package from project/experimental? > > I replaced -ltermcap with -lncurses as suggested elsewhere but still I > cannot compile the package becuase it is looking for a crypt() function. Once more I have to say: Please, do not mod

Installing pine 4.05

1998-10-02 Thread Daniel Mashao
Anybody installed this package from project/experimental? I replaced -ltermcap with -lncurses as suggested elsewhere but still I cannot compile the package becuase it is looking for a crypt() function. Any help? I am having a problem with apps that are color intensive (eg netscape) and font int

Re: pine-4.05

1998-09-30 Thread M.C. Vernon
> Is there anybody working on a port of pine version 4.05 or any other > version > later than 4.0? in /project/experimental, there are the relevant files to build-it-yourself. Debian is not allowed to distribute modified pine binaries. HTH, Matthew -- Elen sila lumenn' omentielvo Steward of

pine-4.05

1998-09-30 Thread Ferdinand Schinagl
Is there anybody working on a port of pine version 4.05 or any other version later than 4.0? I want to use pine for reading emails from a pop server, but unfortunately the currently available debian package of pine is 3.96 or so and does not yet enable me to read from pop servers. Regards, Ferdina

Re: pine 4.05 install

1998-09-26 Thread Bob Nielsen
On Sat, 26 Sep 1998, dsb3 wrote: > On Fri, 25 Sep 1998, Bob Nielsen wrote: > > >On Fri, 25 Sep 1998, dsb3 wrote: > > > >> from the pine CPYRIGHT file (actually looking at v3.96 which I have > >> installed) > >> > >> [snip] > > > >But this explains it: > > > >Although the above trademark and copy

Re: pine 4.05 install

1998-09-26 Thread Martin Bialasinski
>> "d" == dsb3 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: d> maybe this is too pedantic, but are you saying: d> 1) it can be distributed in binary form using unpatched sources ONLY, or This one is true. Ciao, Martin

Re: pine 4.05 install

1998-09-26 Thread dsb3
On Fri, 25 Sep 1998, Bob Nielsen wrote: >On Fri, 25 Sep 1998, dsb3 wrote: > >> from the pine CPYRIGHT file (actually looking at v3.96 which I have >> installed) >> >> [snip] > >But this explains it: > >Although the above trademark and copyright restrictions do not convey >the right to redistribut

Re: pine 4.05 install

1998-09-26 Thread Bob Nielsen
On Fri, 25 Sep 1998, dsb3 wrote: > > from the pine CPYRIGHT file (actually looking at v3.96 which I have > installed) > > [snip] > Permission to use, copy, modify, and distribute this software and its > documentation for any purpose and without fee to the University of > Washington is hereby gra

Re: pine 4.05 install

1998-09-26 Thread dsb3
On Fri, 25 Sep 1998, D'jinnie wrote: >I've been trying to compile pine 4.05 (with the sl5 option, for shadowed >pw) and it barfs on undefined references to crypt and can't find >ltermcap...any ideas? P.S. What is it about the license that doesn't allow >Debian t

pine 4.05 install

1998-09-26 Thread D'jinnie
I've been trying to compile pine 4.05 (with the sl5 option, for shadowed pw) and it barfs on undefined references to crypt and can't find ltermcap...any ideas? P.S. What is it about the license that doesn't allow Debian to make a package out of it? They have compiled binarie