Re: pgp vs. mutt

2000-09-17 Thread will trillich
On Sun, Sep 17, 2000 at 03:18:46AM -0400, Mike Werner wrote: > If you want to have gpg/mutt to *not* verify messages, you can shut it off > by putting the line: > > set pgp_verify_sig = no holy cow, sahib, that was The Answer i sought. come next year -- or next week -- when i look back on m

Re: pgp vs. mutt

2000-09-17 Thread Mike Werner
will trillich wrote: > well someday i may find this fascinating, but for the moment > i'd really like to just have it percolate in 'run silent, run > deep' mode. > now, i get more verbosity than ever (see above) but i'll have > a look to see if i can give gpg a 'shaddap' option... If you want to

Re: pgp vs. mutt

2000-09-17 Thread will trillich
well someday i may find this fascinating, but for the moment i'd really like to just have it percolate in 'run silent, run deep' mode. On Sat, Sep 16, 2000 at 01:26:50PM +, Tom Gilbert wrote: > [-- PGP output follows (current time: Sun Sep 17 00:45:07 2000) --] > gpg: Signature made Sat Sep 16

Re: pgp vs. mutt

2000-09-16 Thread Tom Gilbert
* will trillich ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > i don't give a whit about signing my messages; unless we're passing > munitions details during a war, i don't see the importance (at least > none of my ramblings are even CLOSE to needing any certification or > verification). i just wanna get rid of the

Re: pgp vs. mutt

2000-09-15 Thread will trillich
well at least the message has changed a bit (it's not looking for pgp any more, now it's looking for a signature...) i don't give a whit about signing my messages; unless we're passing munitions details during a war, i don't see the importance (at least none of my ramblings are even CLOSE to needi

Re: pgp vs. mutt

2000-09-14 Thread Gregory T. Norris
What version of mutt are you using? If I remember correctly, for the potato version you need to add "set pgp_default_version = gpg" or similar to ~/.muttrc. On Thu, Sep 14, 2000 at 01:15:58PM -0500, Will Trillich wrote: > On Thu, Sep 14, 2000 at 07:49:15PM +1100, Damon Muller wrote: > > Hi Will,

Re: pgp vs. mutt

2000-09-14 Thread Damon Muller
Hi Will, Chris, I have the following in my ~/.muttrc [rei:~]%grep pgp ~/.muttrc set pgp_default_version=gpg set pgp_autosign set pgp_sign_as= set pgp_timeout=7200 It works fine like that, you shouldn't need much more. cheers, damon Quoth Chris Gray, > On Thu, Sep 14, 2000 at 01:15:58PM -050

Re: pgp vs. mutt

2000-09-14 Thread Chris Gray
On Thu, Sep 14, 2000 at 01:15:58PM -0500, Will Trillich wrote: > mutt is now back to displaying > [-- PGP output follows (current time: Thu Sep 14 13:08:42 2000) --] > sh: /usr/bin/pgp: No such file or directory > [-- End of PGP output --] > for any email from anyone who's got a s

RE: pgp vs. mutt

2000-09-14 Thread Christian Pernegger
> -Original Message- > From: Will Trillich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2000 8:16 PM > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org > Subject: Re: pgp vs. mutt > > > mutt is now back to displaying > [-- PGP output follows (current tim

Re: pgp vs. mutt

2000-09-14 Thread Will Trillich
On Thu, Sep 14, 2000 at 07:49:15PM +1100, Damon Muller wrote: > Hi Will, > > A lot of people on this list are probably using GnuPG (gpg), which is a > GNU replacement for PGP. As long as you have a non-us line in your apt > cources.list do an apt-get install gnupg. so i did # apt-get --purge rem

Re: pgp vs. mutt

2000-09-14 Thread Will Trillich
On Thu, Sep 14, 2000 at 07:49:15PM +1100, Damon Muller wrote: > Hi Will, > > A lot of people on this list are probably using GnuPG (gpg), which is a > GNU replacement for PGP. As long as you have a non-us line in your apt > cources.list do an apt-get install gnupg. > > The pgp you have installed

Re: pgp vs. mutt

2000-09-14 Thread Damon Muller
Hi Will, A lot of people on this list are probably using GnuPG (gpg), which is a GNU replacement for PGP. As long as you have a non-us line in your apt cources.list do an apt-get install gnupg. The pgp you have installed is quite old, and certainly doesn't support gpg and the newer pgp's. If you

pgp vs. mutt

2000-09-13 Thread Will Trillich
after i got tired of seeing /usr/bin/pgp: Command not found in mutt for months on end, i did apt-get install pgp-us and went back into mutt to read my email. now i see [-- PGP output follows (current time: Wed Sep 13 22:56:26 2000) --] ^GUnsupported packet format -