Re: pgp question

1999-09-11 Thread Martin Fluch
On Sat, 11 Sep 1999, Peter Palfrader aka Weasel wrote: > I'm a bit puzzled about the validy of keys that pgp (6.5.1) tells me. I don't trust pgp 6.5.1. Martin -- For public PGP-key: finger [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: pgp question

1999-09-11 Thread Peter Palfrader aka Weasel
On Sat, Sep 11, 1999 at 10:08:09PM -, Pollywog wrote: > You exchanged passphrases?? I don't think you should do that. > Your passphrase is for your own use when you encrypt or sign something. oops, fingerprints :) -- Weasel http://www.cosy.sbg.ac.at/~ppalfrad/ PGP e

RE: pgp question

1999-09-11 Thread Pollywog
On 11-Sep-99 Peter Palfrader aka Weasel wrote: > I'm a fairly new pgp user and hope that the gurus here can bring some > light into my dark. > > I'm a bit puzzled about the validy of keys that pgp (6.5.1) tells me. > > Here's what I have: > KeyID Trust Validity User ID > 0x... margina

pgp question

1999-09-11 Thread Peter Palfrader aka Weasel
I'm a fairly new pgp user and hope that the gurus here can bring some light into my dark. I'm a bit puzzled about the validy of keys that pgp (6.5.1) tells me. Here's what I have: KeyID Trust Validity User ID 0x... marginal complete Dillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cultimate

RE: PGP question

1999-02-23 Thread Christopher J. Morrone
On Tue, 23 Feb 1999, Pollywog wrote: > > On 23-Feb-99 Stephen Pitts wrote: > > Reply-To: > > This is just out of curiosity..not meant to be flamebait :-) > > Those of you who PGP sign your messages, why do you do it? > > I've looked into getting PGP several times, and I have a PGP- > > compliant

RE: PGP question

1999-02-23 Thread Pollywog
On 23-Feb-99 Stephen Pitts wrote: > Reply-To: > This is just out of curiosity..not meant to be flamebait :-) > Those of you who PGP sign your messages, why do you do it? > I've looked into getting PGP several times, and I have a PGP- > compliant mail-reader, but is there any advantage in signing

PGP question

1999-02-23 Thread Stephen Pitts
Reply-To: This is just out of curiosity..not meant to be flamebait :-) Those of you who PGP sign your messages, why do you do it? I've looked into getting PGP several times, and I have a PGP- compliant mail-reader, but is there any advantage in signing your messages? -- Stephen Pitts [EMAIL PROTE

Re: PGP question

1999-01-26 Thread Joachim Trinkwitz
Daniel González Gasull <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I'm still using PGP 2.6.3in, a modified version PGP > 2.6.3i. I'm gonna switch to GNU Privacy Guard. Now I > have no time. I think it's the best solution. You > can get it from http://www.d.shuttle.de/isil/gnupg . > Try the gpg Debian pac

Re: PGP question

1999-01-24 Thread Daniel González Gasull
Hi! "J.T. Wenting" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I believe you are allowed to use the US version yourself if you live in > Canada, but any users who log in from outside the US or Canada will not be > allowed to do so. I think that in your case it would be best to use the > international version (w

Re: PGP question

1999-01-24 Thread John Hasler
J.T. Wenting writes: > I believe you are allowed to use the US version yourself if you live in > Canada, but any users who log in from outside the US or Canada will not > be allowed to do so. I think that in your case it would be best to use > the international version (www.pgpi.com). You are con

RE: PGP question

1999-01-24 Thread J.T. Wenting
] www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/hangar/9203 > -Original Message- > From: Shane Wegner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Sunday, January 24, 1999 8:45 AM > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org > Subject: PGP question > > > Hi, > > I have a question about PGP which I a

PGP question

1999-01-24 Thread Shane Wegner
Hi, I have a question about PGP which I am hoping someone can help me with. I live in Canada and I am wondering what version of PGP I should use. Being a Canadian citizen, I can download the US version or the international version I believe so I am wondering what version, technically speaking, g

Re: pgp question

1998-07-29 Thread Martin Bialasinski
>> "HM" == Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: HM> [1:14am] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> pgp -ks ahpee [...] HM> Key is already signed by user ''. HM> This happens even if I try to sign my own key. pgp signs your own key by default, so they are already signed. I believ you also already signed a

pgp question

1998-07-29 Thread Hamish Moffatt
How do I sign somebody's key? Here's an example of the problem I'm having; [1:14am] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> pgp -ks ahpee Pretty Good Privacy(tm) 2.6.3ia - Public-key encryption for the masses. (c) 1990-96 Philip Zimmermann, Phil's Pretty Good Software. 1996-03-04 International version - not for use

Re: Debian & Pgp question...

1998-01-15 Thread fpolacco
On 13 Jan, Scott Ellis wrote: > > Copy your secret and public key files to your linux machine And when you do this copy, be really carefull with what you do; it would be very easy to leave around copies of the secret key, thus compromizing the key. As a thumb's rule, re-format all the floppy dis

Re: Debian & Pgp question...

1998-01-15 Thread Adam Heath
| On Tuesday, 13 January 98, at 12:14:19 PM | Smorrill wrote about "Debian & Pgp question..." > I have used Pgp for quite awhile with Win95, and thus have already made > my secret key & id number, etc. I would like to get pgp set up with > Linux as I would like to move

Re: Debian & Pgp question...

1998-01-13 Thread dg
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- On Tue, 13 Jan 1998, Scott Ellis wrote: > On Tue, 13 Jan 1998, smorrill wrote: > > I have used Pgp for quite awhile with Win95, and thus have already made > > my secret key & id number, etc. I would like to get pgp set up with > > Linux as I would like to move t

Re: Debian & Pgp question...

1998-01-13 Thread Scott Ellis
On Tue, 13 Jan 1998, smorrill wrote: > I have used Pgp for quite awhile with Win95, and thus have already made > my secret key & id number, etc. I would like to get pgp set up with > Linux as I would like to move to using Debian exclusively. Anybody out > there familiar with this issue of how I

Debian & Pgp question...

1998-01-13 Thread smorrill
I have used Pgp for quite awhile with Win95, and thus have already made my secret key & id number, etc. I would like to get pgp set up with Linux as I would like to move to using Debian exclusively. Anybody out there familiar with this issue of how I would use my same 1028 bit key (created under

Re: Stupid PGP question

1996-12-21 Thread George Bonser
That raises the question of how the US version got on the non-US server :) but thanks! George Bonser [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] On 21 Dec 1996, Rob Browning wrote: > George Bonser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Is there a US PGP .deb package anywhere? I will be darned if I can >

Re: Stupid PGP question

1996-12-21 Thread Rob Browning
George Bonser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Is there a US PGP .deb package anywhere? I will be darned if I can > locate it. I am probably staring right at the thing. I seemed to be > able to find pointers to the non-us PGP but where is the US version? The US version is on the same site, outside t

Stupid PGP question

1996-12-21 Thread George Bonser
Is there a US PGP .deb package anywhere? I will be darned if I can locate it. I am probably staring right at the thing. I seemed to be able to find pointers to the non-us PGP but where is the US version? Thanks. -- George Bonser [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS