* kernel-pcmcia-modules-2.4.27-2-386*
So before I continue, I need to know for 100% certain that it would be
safe to remove those pcmcia modules, since if it isn't safe, then that
would mean my NIC would be rendered inoperable.
I used Synaptic to search for pcmcia-modules, but no 2.6 kernel-spe
* On Tue Jan 28, Jean-Luc On my DELL INSPIRON 8100 when I try woody, I must use yenta.o because
> i82365.o doesn't work.
Merci beaucoup, Jean-Luc. That worked just fine.
Jesper
--
Jesper Holmberg|"But how can |
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | one be warm |
ENST Br, BP 832, 2928
Le Mardi 28 Janvier 2003 13:28, Jesper Holmberg a écrit :
> Runing for example dpkg-reconfigure pcmcia-cs gives:
>
> /lib/modules/2.4.20-686/pcmcia/i82365.o: unresolved symbol
> isapnp_find_dev_R27cb2cad /lib/modules/2.4.20-686/pcmcia/ds.o: init_module:
On my DELL INSPIRON 8100 when I try woody
I recently installed Woody on a new box on a Dell Latitude. It uses a
standard D-Link pcmcia network card, and worked fine after installation.
However, last night I upgraded to Testing, including an upgrade to
kernel-image-2.4.20, and kernel-pcmcia-modules-2.4.20, and now I can't get
my ne
ed:
1) Upgraded my old 486/75 thinkpad to woody. No problems there.
2) Installed kernel-image-2.4.18-386 (2.4.18-5), and rebooted with the
new kernel. No problem.
3) Installed the corresponding kernel-pcmcia-modules-2.4.18-386
(2.4.18-5)
3) Installed pcmcia-cs (3.1.33-6)
4) Started pcmcia servic
Seneca Cunningham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>icosagon:~# dpkg -i /floppy/*.deb
>Selecting previously deselected package psmcia-modules-2.4.17-386.
>(Reading database ... 20503 files and directories currently installed.)
> Unpacking pcmcia-module
:
The actual kernel modules required for this package are contained in the
pcmcia-modules-package, where is the version of the kernel for which the
modules have been compiled.
So I downloaded the appropriate version of pcmcia-modules, and attempted to
install it. But it didn't work:
ico
t
I usually try and make the pcmcia stuff at this point, before rebooting the
new kernel.
> - go to /usr/src/modules/pcmcia and run ./configure then run
> 'make' and finally 'make install'. The last part installs the
> pcmcia modules into the /lib/modules/2.4.17
pected...you
won't have network yet
- go to /usr/src/modules/pcmcia and run ./configure then run
'make' and finally 'make install'. The last part installs the
pcmcia modules into the /lib/modules/2.4.17-# directory.
- you shoud be able to insmod the module
I use th
I don't know what I've done here. I was working fine, and decided to change a
kernel parameter. I did my make xconfig, make-kpkg clean ; make-kpkg
--revision and all ok.
Then I tried the modules. I've already got pcmcia-cs and pcmcia-source
installed. I've been into /usr/src/modules and ru
"der.hans" wrote:
> Am 20. Sep, 2001 schwätzte Richard Black so:
>
> > I am trying to upgrade my kernel from 2.4.3 to 2.4.9. Everything seems
> > okay, _except_ I have no sound and no network (both work fine with
> > 2.4.3). As best as I can tell, the my compilation options are the same
> > (or
Am 20. Sep, 2001 schwätzte Richard Black so:
> I am trying to upgrade my kernel from 2.4.3 to 2.4.9. Everything seems
> okay, _except_ I have no sound and no network (both work fine with
> 2.4.3). As best as I can tell, the my compilation options are the same
> (or very similar) in both versions
"Thomas R. Shemanske" wrote:
> Richard Black wrote:
> >
> > Hi All
> >
> > I am trying to upgrade my kernel from 2.4.3 to 2.4.9. Everything seems
> > okay, _except_ I have no sound and no network (both work fine with
> > 2.4.3). As best as I can tell, the my compilation options are the same
> >
Hi All
I am trying to upgrade my kernel from 2.4.3 to 2.4.9. Everything seems
okay, _except_ I have no sound and no network (both work fine with
2.4.3). As best as I can tell, the my compilation options are the same
(or very similar) in both versions.
The sound I can tackle later, but the lack
Hi All
I am trying to upgrade my kernel from 2.4.3 to 2.4.9. Everything seems
okay, _except_ I have no sound and no network (both work fine with
2.4.3). As best as I can tell, the my compilation options are the same
(or very similar) in both versions.
The sound I can tackle later, but the lack
Replying to my own post:
I never found out what caused this problem. I "solved" it by
re-installing the system (ok as long as you are home sick :-) ) and
using only "stable" files.
/g.
Gustaf Erikson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm trying to install a new kernel w/ PCMCIA on a Dell laptop.
I'm trying to install a new kernel w/ PCMCIA on a Dell laptop.
I've installed the 2.4.9 kernel source from testing, along with the
pcmcia-source (3.1.28-2) from unstable.
I compile the kernel w/o problems. When I try to run make-kpkg
modules_image, the install fails when compiling the file
/usr/s
if I
have omitted any please email me and ask.) I am trying to compile the
PCMCIA modules including the wavelan2 module, using make-kpkg. I have
custom compiled kernel-source-2.2.19 version 2.2.19-5 using make-kpkg.
I have libc6 and libc6-dev 2.2.3-6, pcmcia-cs 3.1.25-3, pcmcia-source
3.1.25-3,
Is there a problem with the PCMCIA modules in kernel 2.2.18?
I can build the modules for kernel 2.2.16 but not 2.2.18 and I have
tried both several times.
thanks
--
Andrew
On Thu, 18 Jan 2001 08:21:39 -0800, Michael Epting said:
> On Wed, Jan 17, 2001 at 07:52:18PM +, Pollywog wrote:
> >
> > Is there a problem with the PCMCIA modules in kernel 2.2.18?
> > I can build the modules for kernel 2.2.16 but not 2.2.18 and I have
> &g
On Wed, Jan 17, 2001 at 07:52:18PM +, Pollywog wrote:
>
> Is there a problem with the PCMCIA modules in kernel 2.2.18?
> I can build the modules for kernel 2.2.16 but not 2.2.18 and I have
> tried both several times.
I just did this yesterday, on a "new" Tosiba Tecr
Is there a problem with the PCMCIA modules in kernel 2.2.18?
I can build the modules for kernel 2.2.16 but not 2.2.18 and I have
tried both several times.
thanks
--
Andrew
Try
#> dmesg
to read boot messages at your leisure.
The remaining pcmcia messages probably come from scripts in etc/rc*.d/
directories. Try
#> ls -l /etc/rc*.d/ | grep pcmcia
to see which such scripts are softlinked there. I should be 'OK' to
remove those links as well as the corresponding script
dpkg --purge pcmcia-cs
Eileen Orbell wrote:
>
> Thank you that removed most of the errors. When I ran that command I did
> receive the following errors though:
> directory not empty so it could not remove all reference..
> can I delete these directories???
> I still get some reference to pcmcia o
Thank you that removed most of the errors. When I ran that command I did
receive the following errors though:
directory not empty so it could not remove all reference..
can I delete these directories???
I still get some reference to pcmcia on boot...
Thanks
At 01:41 AM 12/5/2000 +0100, you wr
I reconfig my kernel and now on boot I get about 5 -6 lines of error re
PCMICIA modules. Because it boots fast I cannot read them all but I am
assuming I am missing the modules. I do not have any PCMCIA hardware
anyway so can I remove this? I did not see any reference to it in make
xconfig??
On Mon, Dec 04, 2000 at 07:21:38PM -0500, Eileen Orbell wrote:
> I reconfig my kernel and now on boot I get about 5 -6 lines of error re
> PCMICIA modules. Because it boots fast I cannot read them all but I am
> assuming I am missing the modules. I do not have any PCMCIA hardware
> anyway so c
I reconfig my kernel and now on boot I get about 5 -6 lines of error re
PCMICIA modules. Because it boots fast I cannot read them all but I am
assuming I am missing the modules. I do not have any PCMCIA hardware
anyway so can I remove this? I did not see any reference to it in make
xconfig??
I reconfig my kernel and now on boot I get about 5 -6 lines of error re
PCMICIA modules. Because it boots fast I cannot read them all but I am
assuming I am missing the modules. I do not have any PCMCIA hardware
anyway so can I remove this? I did not see any reference to it in make
xconfig??
On Mon, Nov 20, 2000 at 11:18:49AM +1100, Bek Oberin wrote:
> Just installed the latest 2.2.17 pcmcia modules package and
> noticed it depended on the kernel image. Why? I want to build
> my OWN kernel, not use the image. couldn't it depend on either
> the kernel image OR
Just installed the latest 2.2.17 pcmcia modules package and
noticed it depended on the kernel image. Why? I want to build
my OWN kernel, not use the image. couldn't it depend on either
the kernel image OR the kernel source?
bekj
--
: --Hacker-Neophile-Eclectic-Geek-Grrl-Queer-Dis
Christophe TROESTLER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I needed to recompile a kernel to support some hardware on my laptop.
> Thus also the PCMCIA modules needed to be build. I issued:
> make-kpkg modules_clean
> make-kpkg modules_image
> and installed. All we
try asking on debian-laptop.
Hi,
I needed to recompile a kernel to support some hardware on my laptop.
Thus also the PCMCIA modules needed to be build. I issued:
make-kpkg modules_clean
make-kpkg modules_image
and installed. All went fine. Except with depmod (in the postinstall
script or otherwise) which
>>"Mark" == Mark Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Mark> 1) Install modules source
Mark> 2) Do "make menuconfig"
Mark> 3) If you want a kernel-image do "make-kpkg --revision number
Mark> kernel_image"
Mark> 3) If you want a modules package "make-kpkg --revision number
Mark> modules_image"
> >>"Mark" == Mark Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Mark> I think this is the problem. I shouldn't have to do the configuring
> Mark> myself because make-kpkg should do it for me. For some reason it
> Mark> seems that it doesn't. It sounds like a bug with make-kpkg.
>
>No, t
>>"Mark" == Mark Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Mark> I think this is the problem. I shouldn't have to do the configuring
Mark> myself because make-kpkg should do it for me. For some reason it
Mark> seems that it doesn't. It sounds like a bug with make-kpkg.
No, this is pilot e
> Mark Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I am trying to use make-kpkg to make a pcmcia-modules package for a
> > laptop. It quits giving the following error:
> >
> > /usr/src/linux/include/linux/module.h:19: linux/modversions.h: No such
> >
Mark Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am trying to use make-kpkg to make a pcmcia-modules package for a
> laptop. It quits giving the following error:
>
> /usr/src/linux/include/linux/module.h:19: linux/modversions.h: No such file
> or
> directory
>
> a
I think maybe "make dep" or
something like that creates the file. I use make-kpkg which automates
all the above. It seems that make-kpkg doesn't work quite properly
when you only make the pcmcia-modules package. You have to first make
the kernel image package to get make-kpkg to
. Then, without doing "make-kpkg clean", I then set the
target to modules_image (the PCMCIA modules stuff).
It seems to fix the problem, but I w
> Well I'm not sure what you've done, but I am using kernel 2.2.15
> (pre19-1) and I have the modversions.h file in:
Yes that's the same version as me (2.2.15pre19-1)
> /usr/src/kernel-source-2.2.15/include/config/modversions.h
> /usr/src/kernel-source-2.2.15/include/linux/modversions.h
Neither
/~pancreas
Work Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, 30 Apr 2000, Mark Phillips wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to use make-kpkg to make a pcmcia-modules package for a
> laptop. It quits giving the following error:
>
> /usr/src/linux/include/linux/module.h:19: linux/modve
Hi,
I am trying to use make-kpkg to make a pcmcia-modules package for a
laptop. It quits giving the following error:
/usr/src/linux/include/linux/module.h:19: linux/modversions.h: No such file or
directory
and sure enough, I can't find a file called "modversions.h" anywhere
on
On Fri, 21 Apr 2000, Rick Macdonald wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Apr 2000, Bruce Sass wrote:
> > the latest Potato boot floppies release. 2.2.11 was just released (last
> > night) and fixes some (all?) of the modconf related problems. There was
> > also an upload of new pcmcia packages a day or two ago (c
give bf-2.2.11 a try.
I'm downloading the boot-floppies, pcmcia-modules and pcmcia-cs
packages now, but I would have thought that a new kernel-image package
would have to come at the same time?
...RickM...
On Fri, 21 Apr 2000, Bruce Sass wrote:
> > I couldn't find any work-around so I've just asked on the boot list. I may
> > have to load slink, then just upgrade to potato (and build my own 2.2.14
> > kernel). That should work, shouldn't it? It looks like just the boot
> > floppies are mismatched, w
On Fri, 21 Apr 2000, Rick Macdonald wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Apr 2000, Bruce Sass wrote:
> > On Thu, 20 Apr 2000, Rick Macdonald wrote:
> > > Trying to install potato from scratch on a NEC Versa 4050H (P90MHz),
> > > depmod reports unresolved symbols for all the pcmcia modul
On Fri, 21 Apr 2000, Bruce Sass wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Apr 2000, Rick Macdonald wrote:
>
> >
> > Trying to install potato from scratch on a NEC Versa 4050H (P90MHz),
> > depmod reports unresolved symbols for all the pcmcia modules. I have
> > zircom and 3com pc
On Thu, 20 Apr 2000, Rick Macdonald wrote:
>
> Trying to install potato from scratch on a NEC Versa 4050H (P90MHz),
> depmod reports unresolved symbols for all the pcmcia modules. I have
> zircom and 3com pcmcia NICs, but I can't get the modules for either to
> load becaus
Trying to install potato from scratch on a NEC Versa 4050H (P90MHz),
depmod reports unresolved symbols for all the pcmcia modules. I have
zircom and 3com pcmcia NICs, but I can't get the modules for either to
load because of this unresolved symbol problem. Without the NIC, I can't
ge
omplaining about 2 functions it can't find.
>
PCMCIA cards get their drivers from the pcmcia-modules, a different source
tree. You can disable the ethernet card section in the normal kernel.
Get:
kernel-package
pcmcia-source
some kernel-source
do:
make menuconfig (or whatever like norm
I installed slink on my laptop, and compiled my kernel with
everything I need. Now when I try loading my PCMCIA netcard, I
get some unresolved symbols. I compiled the ne.o net driver as a
module, and that reduced the number of symbols not found, but are
still complaining about 2 functions it ca
le utilities are version 2.1.121.
Your boot map file is older than /vmlinuz. If you installed /vmlinuz
by hand, please run 'lilo' to update your boot data, and then reboot.
It looks like you have a System V init file setup.
X Windows include files found.
FLTK library not installed.
Peter proposed,
> Hello Richard,
>
> I've got the same problem here on my slink notebook, but I think you're a
> little ahead of me. Could you please tell me what pcmcia-packages I need
> from potato to have the modules compiled and packaged by make-kpkg?
> On my notebook there
> On Wed, 21 Apr 1999 17:16:33 -0400, "Richard E. Hawkins Esq." <[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]> said:
Richard> It's time to update the kernel for my laptop,and I'm trying to use
Richard> make-kpkg to do this. I've managed to get the kernel image .deb
Richard> built, but not the pcmcia stuff.
Rich
On 21-Apr-99 Richard E. Hawkins Esq. wrote:
>
> It's time to update the kernel for my laptop,and I'm trying to use
> make-kpkg to do this. I've managed to get the kernel image .deb built,
> but not the pcmcia stuff.
>
> I've updated to the pcmcia-source from potato, and note that it has
> .d
It's time to update the kernel for my laptop,and I'm trying to use
make-kpkg to do this. I've managed to get the kernel image .deb built,
but not the pcmcia stuff.
I've updated to the pcmcia-source from potato, and note that it has
.debs for up to 2.2.5. However, make-kpkg modules_image fail
On Thu, Jan 28, 1999 at 06:12:08PM -0600, Eric wrote:
> 2. upgrade pcmcia-cs to the 3.0.7 version which is in potato
You need 3.0.8.
--
Mark Brown mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Trying to avoid grumpiness)
http://www.tardis.ed.ac.uk/~broonie/
EUFShttp://www.eusa.ed.ac.uk/socie
into /usr/src/modules/pcmcia-cs
4. attempted to do a 'make-kpkg --revision=custom.1.0 modules_image'
I believe all this is correct, but I continue to get errors when
trying to complete the final step (compiling the pcmcia modules). It
gets pretty far, but it inevitably says something t
On Wed, Jan 13, 1999 at 10:05:21PM +0800, Lindsay Allen wrote:
> The compile fails at the end of 8390.c, quoting text which appears to be a
> comment and is certainly not in 8390.c.
> Anyone had this problem or know of a solution?
> pcmcia-cs_3.0.7-1
> pcmcia-source_3.0.7-1
> kernel 2.2.0-pre6
On Tue, Jan 12, 1999 at 03:47:23PM +0800, Lindsay Allen wrote:
> When I build pcmcia-modules as per instructions I get a file called
> pcmcia-modules-2.1.131-3.0.5-9_i386.deb and it depends on
> pcmcia-cs = 3.0.5-9.
> The problem is that I have pcmcia-cs_3.0.6-2 installed, so the
The compile fails at the end of 8390.c, quoting text which appears to be a
comment and is certainly not in 8390.c.
Anyone had this problem or know of a solution?
pcmcia-cs_3.0.7-1
pcmcia-source_3.0.7-1
kernel 2.2.0-pre6
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Lin
When I build pcmcia-modules as per instructions I get a file called
pcmcia-modules-2.1.131-3.0.5-9_i386.deb and it depends on
pcmcia-cs = 3.0.5-9.
The problem is that I have pcmcia-cs_3.0.6-2 installed, so the new package
will not install. I have just spent an hour trying to figure out how
Dear Ray,
thank you: I had searched everywhere in the system for pcmcia compiled
modules, except in .. !
Remo
On Mon, Sep 21, 1998 at 10:28:32AM +0200, Remo Badii wrote:
> I have just installed pcmcia-source with dselect and run
> make menuconfig
> make-kpkg --revision=custom.1.0 kernel_image modules_image
> dpkg -i ../kernelx.xx.deb
You also should also
dpkg -i ../pcmcia-modules-x.x.xx
I have just installed pcmcia-source with dselect and run
make menuconfig
make-kpkg --revision=custom.1.0 kernel_image modules_image
dpkg -i ../kernelx.xx.deb
No complaints during compilation.
There is now a directory /lib/modules/2.0.34 but still no
pcmcia directory in it and no file modules.
On Thu, 12 Mar 1998, Nebu John Mathai wrote:
> I just purchased an IBM Home and Away PCMCIA/14.4 combo pcmcia card.
>
> I downloaded the pcmcia-cs and pcmcia-modules Debian packages and
> installed them. My kernel is compiled for networking and loadable modules
> however
Hi,
I just purchased an IBM Home and Away PCMCIA/14.4 combo pcmcia card.
I downloaded the pcmcia-cs and pcmcia-modules Debian packages and
installed them. My kernel is compiled for networking and loadable modules
however if I insmod the precompiled modules '8390' and pcnet-cs I get
/l
Hi,
Could you give more than just the two line of the failing
compile? I would like to know what exactly was being compiled, and
where.
I think that must be in the pcmcia module sources, but I can't
be sure.
Also, try
make-kpkg modules-config
before
make-k
I recently built a kernel using kernel-source-2.0.32 from hamm.
Since this replaced my older 2.0.29 kernel, I installed the newer
pcmcia-cs_3.0.0-1 and pcmcia-modules-2.0.32_3.0.0-1k5.
Now when PCMCIA services start at boot time, I get the following
messages:
---
Starting PCMCIA services
Am I mistaken or is the source for the two pcmcia-modules packages
missing in the source directory of bo?
First the modules package doesn't work properly, now I can't even get
the source to compile it myself!
You wrote:
> I've had problems in the past with the pcmcia packages. My
> solution was to use both the kernel source and pcmcia
> source packages and build custom binaries myself. Make sure
> you build the modules from the kernel package. You will
> probably have to define some aliases in /etc
Robert Nicholson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If I recompile my 2.0.6 kernel with the source in rex I'm also
> expected to have to recompile the pcmcia-modules I'm using right?
Sometimes. It depends on what you have changed of the kernel's
configuration. When build
If I recompile my 2.0.6 kernel with the source in rex I'm also
expected to have to recompile the pcmcia-modules I'm using right?
They appear to be available in deb format only as compiled against
2.0.6 kernels but when I put in my Hayes Optima 144 it says that the
modules don't m
75 matches
Mail list logo
