On Fri 11 Nov 2016 at 18:09:33 +0100, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
> Le 11/11/2016 à 17:24, Brian a écrit :
> >
> >As the manual says:
> >
> > CACHE_FILE=
> > Overrides the standard location of the cache file. This setting
> > can be overridden by the environment variable BLKID_FILE. Default
> > i
Le 11/11/2016 à 17:24, Brian a écrit :
As the manual says:
CACHE_FILE=
Overrides the standard location of the cache file. This setting
can be overridden by the environment variable BLKID_FILE. Default
is /run/blkid/blkid.tab, or /etc/blkid.tab on systems without a
/run directory.
On Fri 11 Nov 2016 at 15:38:07 +0100, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
> Le 08/11/2016 à 00:54, Brian a écrit :
> >
> >When blkid is run as root it creates the file
> >/run/blkid/blkid.tab. A user running blkid only gets to see the contents
> >of blkid.tab.
>
> That does not appear to be completely correct
Le 08/11/2016 à 00:54, Brian a écrit :
When blkid is run as root it creates the file
/run/blkid/blkid.tab. A user running blkid only gets to see the contents
of blkid.tab.
That does not appear to be completely correct.
If I run blkid as a standard user after plugging a USB drive, it lists
the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 04:56:36PM -0700, Joe Pfeiffer wrote:
> Brian writes:
[...]
> >> Hopefully. But that's not because bash checks that (as parted is).
> >> It's because the permissions on the device file are set right!
> >
> > udev doesn't come
Brian writes:
> On Wed 09 Nov 2016 at 11:27:11 +0100, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 10:12:13AM +, Brian wrote:
>> >
>> > That gives "-bash: /dev/sda2: Permission denied" for me with a fixed
>> > disk. It's the same for a removable disk. The system came like that.
>>
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 08:48:04PM +, Brian wrote:
> On Wed 09 Nov 2016 at 21:35:14 +0100, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
[...]
> > Hm. Layering error.
>
> Sorry. I'm unfamiliar with this term ("layering errors")
Sorry. Was meaning to say "layering vi
On Wed 09 Nov 2016 at 21:35:14 +0100, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 05:38:01PM +, Brian wrote:
> > On Tue 08 Nov 2016 at 17:54:41 -0500, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> >
> > > >> > Futzing with partitions is the admin's job.
> > > >> Could be, but it's not (g)parted's job to enfo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 05:38:01PM +, Brian wrote:
> On Tue 08 Nov 2016 at 17:54:41 -0500, Stefan Monnier wrote:
>
> > >> > Futzing with partitions is the admin's job.
> > >> Could be, but it's not (g)parted's job to enforce these kinds of rules:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 06:29:32PM +, Brian wrote:
[...]
> Raw disk access to a device the user does not own *is* sacred.
YES! And the OS takes care of that part!
> Access to a device the user does own is up to the user.
Again: wholeheartedly,
On Wed 09 Nov 2016 at 11:27:11 +0100, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 10:12:13AM +, Brian wrote:
> > On Wed 09 Nov 2016 at 09:48:01 +0100, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 08:39:51PM +, Brian wrote:
> > > > On Tue 08 Nov 2016 at 14:41:45 -0500, S
On Wed 09 Nov 2016 at 08:10:37 -0600, Richard Owlett wrote:
> On 11/9/2016 4:27 AM, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> >[*SNIP*]
> >
> >BTW it's very easy to fool the application itself (and this might be
> >a perverse "solution" to Richard's problem). Just run gparted under
> >fakeroot. It won't convey yo
On Wed 09 Nov 2016 at 09:48:01 +0100, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 08:39:51PM +, Brian wrote:
> > On Tue 08 Nov 2016 at 14:41:45 -0500, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> >
> > > >>> *HOWEVER* parted requires root privileges. That is not acceptable.
> > > >>> Suggestions?
>
On Tue 08 Nov 2016 at 17:54:41 -0500, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> >> > Futzing with partitions is the admin's job.
> >> Could be, but it's not (g)parted's job to enforce these kinds of rules:
> >> that's what Unix permissions (and Linux's capabilities) are for.
> >> It's OK to add a warning and prompt
On Wed 09 Nov 2016 at 12:01:10 +0100, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 10:45:52AM +, Brian wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > I hope cfdisk is an acceptable alternative to gparted, which is not on
> > my system. 'fakeroot /sbin/cfdisk' gives "cfdisk: cannot open /dev/sda:
> > Permission
On Tuesday 08 November 2016 20:49:08 Stefan Monnier wrote:
> > Feel free to weight in ;-)
>
>^^^
> No idea where this `t` came from,
>
>
> Stefan
There's a gremlin in your keyboard too, is there? ;-)
Lisi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 10:45:52AM +, Brian wrote:
[...]
> I hope cfdisk is an acceptable alternative to gparted, which is not on
> my system. 'fakeroot /sbin/cfdisk' gives "cfdisk: cannot open /dev/sda:
> Permission denied".
We are talking past
On Wed 09 Nov 2016 at 11:27:11 +0100, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 10:12:13AM +, Brian wrote:
> > On Wed 09 Nov 2016 at 09:48:01 +0100, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 08:39:51PM +, Brian wrote:
> > > > On Tue 08 Nov 2016 at 14:41:45 -0500, S
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 10:12:13AM +, Brian wrote:
> On Wed 09 Nov 2016 at 09:48:01 +0100, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 08:39:51PM +, Brian wrote:
> > > On Tue 08 Nov 2016 at 14:41:45 -0500, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> > >
On Wed 09 Nov 2016 at 09:48:01 +0100, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 08:39:51PM +, Brian wrote:
> > On Tue 08 Nov 2016 at 14:41:45 -0500, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> >
> > > >>> *HOWEVER* parted requires root privileges. That is not acceptable.
> > > >>> Suggestions?
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 08:39:51PM +, Brian wrote:
> On Tue 08 Nov 2016 at 14:41:45 -0500, Stefan Monnier wrote:
>
> > >>> *HOWEVER* parted requires root privileges. That is not acceptable.
> > >>> Suggestions?
> > >>> TIA
> > > Futzin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 02:41:45PM -0500, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> >>> *HOWEVER* parted requires root privileges. That is not acceptable.
> >>> Suggestions?
> >>> TIA
> > Futzing with partitions is the admin's job.
>
> Could be, but it's no
>> > Futzing with partitions is the admin's job.
>> Could be, but it's not (g)parted's job to enforce these kinds of rules:
>> that's what Unix permissions (and Linux's capabilities) are for.
>> It's OK to add a warning and prompt the user to make sure he really
>> means to do that, but there's no
> Feel free to weight in ;-)
^^^
No idea where this `t` came from,
Stefan
On Tue 08 Nov 2016 at 14:41:45 -0500, Stefan Monnier wrote:
> >>> *HOWEVER* parted requires root privileges. That is not acceptable.
> >>> Suggestions?
> >>> TIA
> > Futzing with partitions is the admin's job.
>
> Could be, but it's not (g)parted's job to enforce these kinds of rules:
On Tue 08 Nov 2016 at 05:19:15 -0600, Richard Owlett wrote:
> On 11/8/2016 4:58 AM, Richard Owlett wrote:
> >[snip]
> >
> >Actually I now have two options, "udevadm info" and "/sbin/blkid".
> >>From Brian's comment on bug #776905, in future releases "blkid"
> >may be an option.
>
> I'll have to m
On Tue 08 Nov 2016 at 06:40:26 -0600, David Wright wrote:
> On Tue 08 Nov 2016 at 04:58:05 (-0600), Richard Owlett wrote:
> > On 11/7/2016 8:36 PM, Michael Lange wrote:
> [...]
> > >I think that the command Brian suggested:
> > >
> > > udevadm info --query=property --name=/dev/sda1 | grep ID_FS_T
> On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 06:11:50AM -0600, Richard Owlett wrote:
>> *HOWEVER* parted requires root privileges. That is not acceptable.
>> Suggestions?
>> TIA
Futzing with partitions is the admin's job. fdisk also want's root (or sudo).
You want some user poking around in the dis
On Tue 08 Nov 2016 at 04:58:05 (-0600), Richard Owlett wrote:
> On 11/7/2016 8:36 PM, Michael Lange wrote:
[...]
> >I think that the command Brian suggested:
> >
> > udevadm info --query=property --name=/dev/sda1 | grep ID_FS_TYPE
> >
> >used with every partition that is returned by
> >
> > cat
On 11/8/2016 4:58 AM, Richard Owlett wrote:
[snip]
Actually I now have two options, "udevadm info" and "/sbin/blkid".
From Brian's comment on bug #776905, in future releases "blkid"
may be an option.
I'll have to modify that. Brian has stated in another sub-thread:
... When blkid is run as
On 11/7/2016 5:54 PM, Brian wrote:
On Mon 07 Nov 2016 at 21:07:45 +0100, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
Le 07/11/2016 à 15:18, Richard Owlett a écrit :
tomas@rasputin:~$ ls -al /dev/sd*
brw-rw 1 root disk 8, 0 Nov 7 09:06 /dev/sda
brw-rw 1 root disk 8, 1 Nov 7 09:06 /dev/sda1
br
On 11/7/2016 8:36 PM, Michael Lange wrote:
On Mon, 7 Nov 2016 23:48:53 +
Lisi Reisz wrote:
Speaking as a Jessie user, changing to root and using lsblk -f is
quicker and easier!
Sure, but the OP said that's not an option.
I think that the command Brian suggested:
udevadm info --query
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 07:54:23PM +0300, Reco wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 04:05:17PM +0100, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 09:35:32AM -0500, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > > I started writing that in my previous mess
On Mon, 7 Nov 2016 23:48:53 +
Lisi Reisz wrote:
>
> Speaking as a Jessie user, changing to root and using lsblk -f is
> quicker and easier!
Sure, but the OP said that's not an option.
I think that the command Brian suggested:
udevadm info --query=property --name=/dev/sda1 | grep ID_FS_TY
On Mon 07 Nov 2016 at 23:48:53 +, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Monday 07 November 2016 19:15:50 Brian wrote:
> > On Mon 07 Nov 2016 at 18:42:37 +0100, Felipe Salvador wrote:
> > > On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 04:09:24PM +, Brian wrote:
> > > > I get the same as you on Debian 8.6. On unstable the comm
On Mon 07 Nov 2016 at 21:07:45 +0100, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
> Le 07/11/2016 à 15:18, Richard Owlett a écrit :
> >>>
> >>> tomas@rasputin:~$ ls -al /dev/sd*
> >>> brw-rw 1 root disk 8, 0 Nov 7 09:06 /dev/sda
> >>> brw-rw 1 root disk 8, 1 Nov 7 09:06 /dev/sda1
> >>> brw-rw 1 r
On Monday 07 November 2016 19:15:50 Brian wrote:
> On Mon 07 Nov 2016 at 18:42:37 +0100, Felipe Salvador wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 04:09:24PM +, Brian wrote:
> > > I get the same as you on Debian 8.6. On unstable the command 'lsblk -f'
> > > shows all the fields populated. I wonder wha
Le 07/11/2016 à 15:18, Richard Owlett a écrit :
tomas@rasputin:~$ ls -al /dev/sd*
brw-rw 1 root disk 8, 0 Nov 7 09:06 /dev/sda
brw-rw 1 root disk 8, 1 Nov 7 09:06 /dev/sda1
brw-rw 1 root disk 8, 2 Nov 7 09:06 /dev/sda2
brw-rw 1 root disk 8, 5 Nov 7 09:06 /dev/s
On Mon 07 Nov 2016 at 18:42:37 +0100, Felipe Salvador wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 04:09:24PM +, Brian wrote:
> >
> > I get the same as you on Debian 8.6. On unstable the command 'lsblk -f'
> > shows all the fields populated. I wonder what Felipe Salvador is using?
>
> ~$ apt-show-versio
On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 07:59:56AM -0700, Joe Pfeiffer wrote:
> Felipe Salvador writes:
>
> > On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 06:37:53AM -0600, Richard Owlett wrote:
> >> On 11/7/2016 6:20 AM, Felipe Salvador wrote:
> >> > On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 06:11:50AM -0600, Richard Owlett wrote:
> >> > > *HOWEVER*
On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 04:09:24PM +, Brian wrote:
> On Mon 07 Nov 2016 at 09:27:47 -0600, Richard Owlett wrote:
>
> > On 11/7/2016 8:19 AM, Felipe Salvador wrote:
> > >
> > >I don't see this behaviour
> > >
> > >~$ lsblk -fr
> > >NAME FSTYPE LABEL UUID MOUNTPOINT
> > >sda
> > >sda1 ext2 ...
[snip]
file -s /dev/sda{1..5} | awk '{print $5}'
I was just about to post a very similar followup when I discovered a
gaping security hole (really, about as big as it gets) on my machine:
snowball:404$ ls -l /dev/sda2
brw-rw-rw- 1 root root 8, 2 Nov 7 07:54 /dev/sda2
I use stretch, but I
Hi.
On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 04:05:17PM +0100, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 09:35:32AM -0500, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > I started writing that in my previous message, but then I actually
> > tested it on my own system. Good thing I did, because I got the
> > same result
On Monday 07 November 2016 14:48:29 Richard Owlett wrote:
> On 11/7/2016 7:57 AM, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 07:12:00AM -0600, Richard Owlett wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> >>> Debian is trying to protect you from someon
Le septidi 17 brumaire, an CCXXV, Greg Wooledge a écrit :
> There is a minuscule decrease
> in efficiency when another directory in PATH has to be searched, but
> it's probably not going to be noticeable.
What will be noticeable, though, it the namespace p
On Mon 07 Nov 2016 at 09:27:47 -0600, Richard Owlett wrote:
> On 11/7/2016 8:19 AM, Felipe Salvador wrote:
> >
> >I don't see this behaviour
> >
> >~$ lsblk -fr
> >NAME FSTYPE LABEL UUID MOUNTPOINT
> >sda
> >sda1 ext2 ... /boot
> >sda2 ext4 ... /
> >sda3 ext2 ... /tmp
> >etc etc etc
> >
> >or
>
On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 09:57:14AM -0600, Richard Owlett wrote:
> In any case, off-list someone suggested using
>/sbin/blkid /dev/sda*
> That works. *BUT* I wonder about unknown implications of "/sbin"
> being required if not explicitly running as root.
It's simply because /sbin is not in you
On 11/7/2016 8:27 AM, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 08:18:28AM -0600, Richard Owlett wrote:
Evidently not a solution. Added myself to both "disk" and "root"
groups.
Had no effect when attempting to run either lsblk or parted.
Is there a reason you can't use sudo?
Not a matter
On 11/7/2016 8:19 AM, Felipe Salvador wrote:
On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 06:37:53AM -0600, Richard Owlett wrote:
On 11/7/2016 6:20 AM, Felipe Salvador wrote:
On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 06:11:50AM -0600, Richard Owlett wrote:
*HOWEVER* parted requires root privileges. That is not acceptable.
Suggestio
Felipe Salvador writes:
> On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 06:37:53AM -0600, Richard Owlett wrote:
>> On 11/7/2016 6:20 AM, Felipe Salvador wrote:
>> > On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 06:11:50AM -0600, Richard Owlett wrote:
>> > > *HOWEVER* parted requires root privileges. That is not acceptable.
>> > > Suggestio
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 08:48:29AM -0600, Richard Owlett wrote:
> On 11/7/2016 7:57 AM, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> >-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> >Hash: SHA1
> >
> >On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 07:12:00AM -0600, Richard Owlett wrote:
[...]
> I doubt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 09:35:32AM -0500, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 03:27:12PM +0100, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> > Two things:
[...]
> I started writing that in my previous message, but then I actually
> tested it on my own system
On 11/7/2016 7:57 AM, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 07:12:00AM -0600, Richard Owlett wrote:
[...]
Debian is trying to protect you from someone taking over your...
say Apache [...]
My Debian machines do not physically have netwo
On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 03:27:12PM +0100, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> Two things:
> - check that your disk devices are actually readable (and probably
>writable, I botched that, cf. David's mail) by group disk
> - your being added to disk is effective *after* logging in after
>you'd made th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 09:27:11AM -0500, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 08:18:28AM -0600, Richard Owlett wrote:
> > Evidently not a solution. Added myself to both "disk" and "root"
> > groups.
> > Had no effect when attempting to run
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 08:18:28AM -0600, Richard Owlett wrote:
> On 11/7/2016 7:25 AM, Richard Owlett wrote:
> >On 11/7/2016 6:47 AM, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> >>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> >>Hash: SHA1
> >>
> >>On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 06:11:
On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 08:18:28AM -0600, Richard Owlett wrote:
> Evidently not a solution. Added myself to both "disk" and "root"
> groups.
> Had no effect when attempting to run either lsblk or parted.
Is there a reason you can't use sudo?
Sample output on my system at work:
$ lsblk -f
NAME
On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 06:37:53AM -0600, Richard Owlett wrote:
> On 11/7/2016 6:20 AM, Felipe Salvador wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 06:11:50AM -0600, Richard Owlett wrote:
> > > *HOWEVER* parted requires root privileges. That is not acceptable.
> > > Suggestions?
> > > TIA
> >
> > lsblk -fr
On 11/7/2016 7:25 AM, Richard Owlett wrote:
On 11/7/2016 6:47 AM, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 06:11:50AM -0600, Richard Owlett wrote:
I need to identify file system on all partitions of my hard drive
whether mounted or not.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 08:02:30AM -0600, David Wright wrote:
> On Mon 07 Nov 2016 at 13:47:27 (+0100), to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 06:11:50AM -0600, Richard Owlett wrote:
> > > I need to identify file system on all partitions o
On Mon 07 Nov 2016 at 13:47:27 (+0100), to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 06:11:50AM -0600, Richard Owlett wrote:
> > I need to identify file system on all partitions of my hard drive
> > whether mounted or not.
> > parted /dev/sda print | grep ext | grep -v exte
> > reports the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 07:25:33AM -0600, Richard Owlett wrote:
[...]
> >>*HOWEVER* parted requires root privileges. That is not acceptable.
> >>Suggestions?
[...]
> >So you'd have to be associated to the "disk" group to read those
> >things and yo
On Monday, November 07, 2016 07:11:50 AM Richard Owlett wrote:
> I need to identify file system on all partitions of my hard drive
> whether mounted or not.
> parted /dev/sda print | grep ext | grep -v exte
> reports the desired information [partitions formatted ext?] in a
> convenient format.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 07:12:00AM -0600, Richard Owlett wrote:
[...]
> >Debian is trying to protect you from someone taking over your...
> >say Apache [...]
>
> My Debian machines do not physically have networking capability.
> See my email hearder
On 11/7/2016 6:47 AM, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 06:11:50AM -0600, Richard Owlett wrote:
I need to identify file system on all partitions of my hard drive
whether mounted or not.
parted /dev/sda print | grep ext | grep -v e
On 11/7/2016 6:51 AM, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 06:37:53AM -0600, Richard Owlett wrote:
On 11/7/2016 6:20 AM, Felipe Salvador wrote:
On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 06:11:50AM -0600, Richard Owlett wrote:
*HOWEVER* parted requires ro
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 06:37:53AM -0600, Richard Owlett wrote:
> On 11/7/2016 6:20 AM, Felipe Salvador wrote:
> >On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 06:11:50AM -0600, Richard Owlett wrote:
> >>*HOWEVER* parted requires root privileges. That is not acceptable.
> >
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 06:11:50AM -0600, Richard Owlett wrote:
> I need to identify file system on all partitions of my hard drive
> whether mounted or not.
> parted /dev/sda print | grep ext | grep -v exte
> reports the desired information [parti
On 11/7/2016 6:20 AM, Felipe Salvador wrote:
On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 06:11:50AM -0600, Richard Owlett wrote:
*HOWEVER* parted requires root privileges. That is not acceptable.
Suggestions?
TIA
lsblk -fr ?
Debian is perverse ;{
man page suggested good things.
However when run as other than r
On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 06:11:50AM -0600, Richard Owlett wrote:
I need to identify file system on all partitions of my hard drive
whether mounted or not.
parted /dev/sda print | grep ext | grep -v exte
reports the desired information [partitions formatted ext?] in a
convenient format.
*HOWE
Op 07-11-16 om 13:11 schreef Richard Owlett:
I need to identify file system on all partitions of my hard drive
whether mounted or not.
parted /dev/sda print | grep ext | grep -v exte
reports the desired information [partitions formatted ext?] in a
convenient format.
*HOWEVER* parted requires
On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 06:11:50AM -0600, Richard Owlett wrote:
> *HOWEVER* parted requires root privileges. That is not acceptable.
> Suggestions?
> TIA
lsblk -fr ?
--
Felipe Salvador
I need to identify file system on all partitions of my hard drive
whether mounted or not.
parted /dev/sda print | grep ext | grep -v exte
reports the desired information [partitions formatted ext?] in a
convenient format.
*HOWEVER* parted requires root privileges. That is not acceptable.
Su
73 matches
Mail list logo
