ully someone elsewho has the same problem will see this post.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Stewart
> >
> > On Thu, 7 Nov 2002, nate wrote:
> >
> > > Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2002 18:40:11 -0800 (PST)
> > > From: nate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >
.
Cheers,
Stewart
On Thu, 7 Nov 2002, nate wrote:
> Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2002 18:40:11 -0800 (PST)
> From: nate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: pam-ldap headaches
> Resent-Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2002 20:41:18 -0600 (CST)
> Resent-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED
:27 +1100 (EST)
> From: Stewart James <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: pam-ldap headaches
> Resent-Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2002 18:26:35 -0600 (CST)
> Resent-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Attempting to get sendmail to authenticated vi sasl
> >
> Just to reassure you that you're not going mad, I've found exactly the
> same problem on my machines - pam_ldap will fail with the error "unable
> to connect to ldap server", while all other applications on the machine
> (including ldapsearch) quite happily converse with the ldap server.
> I'
Begin Stewart James quotation:
> > from the servers that do NOT work can you try something like
> >
> > ldapsearch -b "o=vu.edu.au" -LLL -H "ldap://ldap.vu.edu.au:389/";
> > '(objectClass=*)' -x
>
> Tested all of that. This is why the problem is giving me nightmares. All
> of the servers that I
> from the servers that do NOT work can you try something like
>
> ldapsearch -b "o=vu.edu.au" -LLL -H "ldap://ldap.vu.edu.au:389/";
> '(objectClass=*)' -x
>
Tested all of that. This is why the problem is giving me nightmares. All
of the servers that I have tried actually have other apps on them
Stewart James said:
>
> I am so sorry, I just realised why I was not seeing my posts in the
> archives. Helps if you change to most recent pages. I was posting without
> being a member and thought maybe debial was dropping my posts for some
> reason), my last post was being a member.
well glad i r
the multiposts.
Cheers,
Stewart
On Thu, 7 Nov 2002, nate wrote:
> Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2002 16:52:31 -0800 (PST)
> From: nate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: pam-ldap headaches
> Resent-Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2002 18:53:35 -0600 (CST)
> Resent-From: [EMAI
Stewart James said:
> Has anyone else seen this.
yes I have seen your post 3 times. At first I thought I was going
crazy so I verified it in the archives. Posting multiple times is
not the best way to get a response.
I responsed to your original request, but did not notice any replies
back. You
Hi,
Attempting to get sendmail to authenticated vi sasl -> pam.
Now I know that I am making it as far as pam in the authentication, but
pam_ldap is failing. The error is always:
cerberus sm-mta[9724]: pam_ldap: ldap_simple_bind Can't contact LDAP
server
running ethereal I can see it lookup the
Hi,
Attempting to get sendmail to authenticated vi sasl -> pam.
Now I know that I am making it as far as pam in the authentication, but
pam_ldap is failing. The error is always:
cerberus sm-mta[9724]: pam_ldap: ldap_simple_bind Can't contact LDAP
server
running ethereal I can see it lookup the
Stewart James said:
>
> Hi,
>
> Attempting to get sendmail to authenticated vi sasl -> pam.
>
> Now I know that I am making it as far as pam in the authentication, but
> pam_ldap is failing. The error is always:
> cerberus sm-mta[9724]: pam_ldap: ldap_simple_bind Can't contact LDAP
> server
what d
Hi,
Attempting to get sendmail to authenticated vi sasl -> pam.
Now I know that I am making it as far as pam in the authentication, but
pam_ldap is failing. The error is always:
cerberus sm-mta[9724]: pam_ldap: ldap_simple_bind Can't contact LDAP
server
running ethereal I can see it lookup the
13 matches
Mail list logo
