On Debian Sid I recommend disabling the unattended-upgrades services entirely:
sudo systemctl disable --now unattended-upgrades
On Friday, October 1, 2021 2:36:37 PM CEST Miguel A. Vallejo wrote:
> A few days ago I noticed my debian unstable started to update packages
> automatically. A quick ins
On 01/10/2021 15:43, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
Probably to reconfigure the unattended-upgrades functionality in apt
dpkg-reconfigure unattended-upgrades
should do it.
IMO unattended-upgrades should be uninstalled in Sid. No reason to auto
update. Everything should be checked by hand.
--
With
On Fri, Oct 01, 2021 at 02:36:37PM +0200, Miguel A. Vallejo wrote:
> A few days ago I noticed my debian unstable started to update packages
> automatically. A quick inspection showed apt was updated, and also the
> configuration files in /etc/apt/apt.conf.d, including a
> 20auto-upgrades file with
A few days ago I noticed my debian unstable started to update packages
automatically. A quick inspection showed apt was updated, and also the
configuration files in /etc/apt/apt.conf.d, including a
20auto-upgrades file with all options enabled.
Because auto update in sid is at least dangerous, wha
On Sun, 2004-10-17 at 22:50, Marco Paganini wrote:
> I've been looking for a solution for this dilemma on the net. The
> closest thing I found is Debian's "harden*" packages, that use the
> "Conflict:" feature to conflict with known insecure software. The
> question is: Is there a similar package t
Hi All,
Debian is a sysadmin's dream when dealing with security when using
stable. I do, however, have a number of servers running in a mix of
stable and unstable, and keeping them up-to-date with the security
announcements is not so easy.
When using unstable, using apt-get upgrade won't normally
On 2004-03-22, Matthew Joyce penned:
>
>> -Original Message- From: Rajesh Menon
>> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, 22 March 2004 1:43 PM To:
>> Matthew Joyce Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: packages
>> in unstable
>>
>>
>> why not i
> -Original Message-
> From: Rajesh Menon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, 22 March 2004 1:43 PM
> To: Matthew Joyce
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: packages in unstable
>
>
> why not install the proprietary sun jdk available from the
>
why not install the proprietary sun jdk available from the sun download
site? the install is quite an easy one.
On Mon, 22 Mar 2004, Matthew Joyce wrote:
>
> I have an oportunity to use Debian for an important project, this
> project requires the following app versions.
>
> Java 1.4.1
> Postgre
I have an oportunity to use Debian for an important project, this
project requires the following app versions.
Java 1.4.1
Postgres db 7.4
Tomcat 4.1.29
I can see that Postgres and Tomcat are in unstable, but I have not found
a java package '1.4.1'.
Looking at these two packages...
http://packa
Chris wrote:
On Sun, 2004-02-22 at 18:55, Henry Hollenberg wrote:
Henry Hollenberg wrote:
I keep getting a line from dselect about packages that will
not be upgraded:
98 upgraded, 36 newly installed, 0 to remove and 71 not upgraded.
I wonder, have I screwed something up?
Regardless of how th
On Sun, 2004-02-22 at 18:55, Henry Hollenberg wrote:
> Henry Hollenberg wrote:
> > I keep getting a line from dselect about packages that will
> > not be upgraded:
> >
> > 98 upgraded, 36 newly installed, 0 to remove and 71 not upgraded.
> >
> > I wonder, have I screwed something up?
> >
Regar
Henry Hollenberg wrote:
I keep getting a line from dselect about packages that will
not be upgraded:
98 upgraded, 36 newly installed, 0 to remove and 71 not upgraded.
I wonder, have I screwed something up?
Here is my "cat /etc/apt/sources.list":
deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ unstable main
On (19/02/04 20:54), Henry Hollenberg wrote:
> I keep getting a line from dselect about packages that will
> not be upgraded:
>
> 98 upgraded, 36 newly installed, 0 to remove and 71 not upgraded.
>
> I wonder, have I screwed something up?
This morning I upgraded using aptitude and experienced so
I keep getting a line from dselect about packages that will
not be upgraded:
98 upgraded, 36 newly installed, 0 to remove and 71 not upgraded.
I wonder, have I screwed something up?
Here is my "cat /etc/apt/sources.list":
deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ unstable main non-free contrib
deb ht
On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 06:43:18PM +1200, Paul William wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Are packages in unstable updated or is unstable like woody and is only
> released periodically?
>
Unlike woody, `unstable' gets updated frequently. You might also
consider `testing', which, from
On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 06:43:18PM +1200, Paul William wrote:
> Are packages in unstable updated
On a daily basis, yes.
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? C
Hi!
On Thu Jul 17, 2003 at 06:43:18PM +1200, Paul William wrote:
> Are packages in unstable updated or is unstable like woody and is only
> released periodically?
See http://www.debian.org/releases/sid/ for a detailed answer.
So long
Thomas
--
.''`. Obviously we do not want
Hi,
Are packages in unstable updated or is unstable like woody and is only
released periodically?
Thanks
Paul
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
dobler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I was wondering why there are some small packages that are not upgraded even
>when a new release that fixes some bugs and doesn't bring any new
>incompatibilities is out?
>
>I was thinking of xqf, qstat or mozilla for instance
>
>On the other hand, some very imp
dobler wrote:
> I was wondering why there are some small packages that are not upgraded even
> when a new release that fixes some bugs
If you can replicate the old bug, file a bug report and state
that the new verion X.Y fixes it.
> and doesn't bring an
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 06:45:45PM +0100, dobler wrote:
> I was wondering why there are some small packages that are not upgraded even
> when a new release that fixes some bugs and doesn't bring any new
> incompatibilities is out?
>
> I was thinking of xqf, qstat or mozilla for instance
Well, s
Hi there
I was wondering why there are some small packages that are not upgraded even
when a new release that fixes some bugs and doesn't bring any new
incompatibilities is out?
I was thinking of xqf, qstat or mozilla for instance
On the other hand, some very important packages that are likely
On Tue, Feb 08, 2000 at 03:11:05AM -0500, Harlan Crystal wrote:
> I was trying to find out where to report this, but I couldn't..
>
> Xshipwars reports that it cannot be installed because of dependancy
> problems.
Hi,
apt-get -d install xshipwars
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency
I was trying to find out where to report this, but I couldn't..
Xshipwars reports that it cannot be installed because of dependancy
problems.
- Harlan
PS - Where is the appropriate place to report this, so I know next time?
I am trying to install a new machien using unstable.
I choose the nis package in dselect, but the install script for it
complains that it wants to remove a file used by the hostname package.
I thought I would just dlete the hostname package, since I do have NIS
On Wed, Oct 15, 1997 at 10:22:33AM -0400, Scott Ellis wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Oct 1997 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > You have to *upgrade* xlib6 before installing xlib6g (which conflicts only
> > to older versions of xlib6. I hope you know that you are going to use the
> > hamm system, which is somew
On Wed, 15 Oct 1997 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> You have to *upgrade* xlib6 before installing xlib6g (which conflicts only
> to older versions of xlib6. I hope you know that you are going to use the
> hamm system, which is somewhat unstable (because of the change from libc5
> to libc6. xlib6 is lib
Hello!
You have to *upgrade* xlib6 before installing xlib6g (which conflicts only
to older versions of xlib6. I hope you know that you are going to use the
hamm system, which is somewhat unstable (because of the change from libc5
to libc6. xlib6 is libc5, and xlib6g is libc6, and they are not
kom
Hi.
I'm trying to install the new version of Scotty because I want tkined but
it requires tk8.0 which depends on one of the new 'g' packages which seem
to be appearing in unstable... in this case xlib6g.
Now I just tried to install these new xlib6g packages and hosed my system
because xlib6g co
30 matches
Mail list logo
