Re: Efficient Package Dependency Search with aptitude

Le 4/24/24 à 13:11, Dan Ritter a écrit> Also, I think you have meanings reversed. apt-cache depends psmisc produces the list of packages that psmisc needs to function. apt-cache rdepends psmisc produces the list of packages that need psmisc to be installed first. -dsr- Dan, Thank you for

Re: Efficient Package Dependency Search with aptitude

Yassine Chaouche wrote: > In my ongoing mission for precise package management, > I embarked on a quest to swiftly locate all installed packages dependent on > /mysql-server/. > Swift reconnaissance led me to /aptitude/, our stalwart ally in the Debian > arsenal. > Executing a tactical maneuver

Efficient Package Dependency Search with aptitude

Debian Users, In my ongoing mission for precise package management, I embarked on a quest to swiftly locate all installed packages dependent on /mysql-server/. Swift reconnaissance led me to /aptitude/, our stalwart ally in the Debian arsenal. Executing a tactical maneuver akin to this: |# apti

Re: Crossgrading Wheezy from 32bit to 64bit: Solving package dependency problems after kernel change.

Hi Sven, Thanks for that suggestion. I've quickly tried this on a test VM and indeed crossgrading seems to work much better in debian 9 compared to debian 7. Thanks, Pieter > On 16 Jan 2018, at 16:03, Sven Hartge wrote: > > Pieter Van Isacker wrote: > >> While testing change a Debian Wheezy

Re: Crossgrading Wheezy from 32bit to 64bit: Solving package dependency problems after kernel change.

Hi, On Tue, 16 Jan 2018 14:58:48 +0100 Pieter Van Isacker wrote: > Hi all, > > While testing change a Debian Wheezy from 32bit to 64bit I ran into an > issue. Following the guide on https://wiki.debian.org/CrossGrading > Once we've change to 64bit we > pla

Re: Crossgrading Wheezy from 32bit to 64bit: Solving package dependency problems after kernel change.

Sven Hartge wrote: > Still, there is no guarantee it will work and for production systems I > strongly advise you to just backup the data and reinstall from scratch > as 64bit system. +1 copy data (backup) dpkg --get-selections install 64 dpkg --set-selections migrate configurations 90% is plan

Re: Crossgrading Wheezy from 32bit to 64bit: Solving package dependency problems after kernel change.

Pieter Van Isacker wrote: > While testing change a Debian Wheezy from 32bit to 64bit I ran into an > issue. Following the guide on https://wiki.debian.org/CrossGrading > Once we've change to 64bit we > plan to update to Debian 8 and then possibly to Debian 9

Crossgrading Wheezy from 32bit to 64bit: Solving package dependency problems after kernel change.

Hi all, While testing change a Debian Wheezy from 32bit to 64bit I ran into an issue. Following the guide on https://wiki.debian.org/CrossGrading Once we've change to 64bit we plan to update to Debian 8 and then possibly to Debian 9 Changing the kernel to

Re: OpenShot python-mlt package dependency problem - RETRACTED

Joel Roth wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm using sid, to get the latest and greatest at > the cost of some expected pains. > > I need to do some basic video editing. My first choice > is openshot, advertised as easy to use. I found that pitivi installs readily, has good docs. I'll start here. Of course

OpenShot python-mlt package dependency problem

Hi all, I'm using sid, to get the latest and greatest at the cost of some expected pains. I need to do some basic video editing. My first choice is openshot, advertised as easy to use. However it depends on python-mlt5, which apt-get says is replaced by python-mlt or python-mlt:i386. Python-mlt

Re: Ignore package dependency ruby.

On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 04:56:18PM +0200, Brent Clark wrote: > Hiya > > I need to install puppet on one of my machines. Problem is, I > already have Ruby Enterprise, and i don't want to have both on the > same machine. I'm not familiar with "Ruby Enterprise", but I assume it's a non-packaged vers

Ignore package dependency ruby.

Hiya I need to install puppet on one of my machines. Problem is, I already have Ruby Enterprise, and i don't want to have both on the same machine. If you see the following: num-web01:/tmp# aptitude -t squeeze-backports install puppet facter git-core The following NEW packages will be install

Re: 'mktemp' testing package dependency

On 2009-06-17 15:23 +0200, Daniel Burrows wrote: > On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 07:47:20AM +0200, Sven Joachim was > heard to say: >> On 2009-06-17 05:59 +0200, Daniel Burrows wrote: >> >> > On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 10:59:03PM +0200, Sven Joachim >> > was heard to say: >> >> On 2009-06-16 21:44 +02

Re: 'mktemp' testing package dependency

On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 07:47:20AM +0200, Sven Joachim was heard to say: > On 2009-06-17 05:59 +0200, Daniel Burrows wrote: > > > On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 10:59:03PM +0200, Sven Joachim > > was heard to say: > >> On 2009-06-16 21:44 +0200, Jason Filippou wrote: > >> > Downgrade the following pa

Re: 'mktemp' testing package dependency

On 2009-06-17 05:59 +0200, Daniel Burrows wrote: > On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 10:59:03PM +0200, Sven Joachim was > heard to say: >> On 2009-06-16 21:44 +0200, Jason Filippou wrote: >> > Downgrade the following packages: >> > mktemp [1.6-4 (now) -> 1.5-9 (stable)] >> > >> > Score is 80 >> >> I wond

Re: 'mktemp' testing package dependency

On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 10:59:03PM +0200, Sven Joachim was heard to say: > On 2009-06-16 21:44 +0200, Jason Filippou wrote: > > Downgrade the following packages: > > mktemp [1.6-4 (now) -> 1.5-9 (stable)] > > > > Score is 80 > > I wonder why aptitude is suggesting this, downgrading mktemp would

Re: 'mktemp' testing package dependency

On 2009-06-16 21:44 +0200, Jason Filippou wrote: > Over the last few days aptitude in my testing system detects an > unsolved package dependency, concerning the package 'mktemp'. Here's > the output of full-upgrade: > > ja...@debian:~$ sudo aptitude full-upgrade &

Re: 'mktemp' testing package dependency

On Tue, 16 Jun 2009 22:44:21 +0300 Jason Filippou wrote: Hello Jason, > Or just any information regarding mktemp? Using Synpatic, mktemp is marked as local/obsolete. This is in testing, of course. Marking mktemp for removal warns me that doing so might make my system unusable. I therefore de

'mktemp' testing package dependency

Hello, Over the last few days aptitude in my testing system detects an unsolved package dependency, concerning the package 'mktemp'. Here's the output of full-upgrade: ja...@debian:~$ sudo aptitude full-upgrade Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading st

Re: debian/control package dependency list (how to exclude some version)

On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 03:19:03PM -0700, qing zhao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was heard to say: > Is there a way that I can exclude some package version in package > dependency list. I understand that the current relationships between > packages are: <<, <=, =, >= and >&

Re: debian/control package dependency list (how to exclude some version)

On 10/08/2007 05:19 PM, qing zhao wrote: In debian/control file: Is there a way that I can exclude some package version in package dependency list. I understand that the current relationships between packages are: <<, <=, =, >= and >> for strictly earlier, earlier or eq

debian/control package dependency list (how to exclude some version)

In debian/control file: Is there a way that I can exclude some package version in package dependency list. I understand that the current relationships between packages are: <<, <=, =, >= and >> for strictly earlier, earlier or equal, exactly equal, later or equal and strictly l

Re: Where to file a package-dependency bug?

Since Andrew Vaughan already answered your first question, I'll just get this one: The Wanderer wrote: > (As long as I'm here anyway, a minor question on completely another > topic: since I'm told that apt-get and apt-cache are deprecated, what is > the intended successor - in aptitude or similar

Re: Where to file a package-dependency bug?

On 01/02/2006 05:16 PM, Andrew Vaughan wrote: On Tue, 3 Jan 2006 09:07, The Wanderer wrote: Okay, that does sound intentional enough. (I'm currently wondering how to get reportbug to re-present its initial "first-run setup" sequence, since I cancelled out of that because I'd given the wrong co

Re: Where to file a package-dependency bug?

On Tue, 3 Jan 2006 09:07, The Wanderer wrote: > Okay, that does sound intentional enough. (I'm currently wondering how > to get reportbug to re-present its initial "first-run setup" sequence, > since I cancelled out of that because I'd given the wrong command line > and as a result now have no ~/.

Re: Where to file a package-dependency bug?

(...rassum, frassum...) On 01/02/2006 04:00 PM, Kevin B. McCarty wrote: The Wanderer wrote: (In the process, I've discovered that reportbug does not permit a bug to be reported on a dependency package, but only on the packages it depends on. This is probably another bug...) I didn't believe

Re: Where to file a package-dependency bug?

The Wanderer wrote: > (In the process, I've discovered that reportbug does not permit a bug to > be reported on a dependency package, but only on the packages it depends > on. This is probably another bug...) I didn't believe this at first but it's true! I think it's planned behavior, though. L

Re: Where to file a package-dependency bug?

(Grrr... same broken "reply to poster, not to list" behaviour... resending to the mailing list, and setting reply-to by hand despite the extra aggravation.) On 01/02/2006 12:20 PM, Kevin B. McCarty wrote: The Wanderer wrote: In current sid, the x-winow-system-core package depends on both xfon

Re: Where to file a package-dependency bug?

The Wanderer wrote: > In current sid, the x-winow-system-core package depends on both > xfonts-75dpi and xfonts-100dpi. The package description for xfonts-75dpi > includes the note: > > > == > This package and xfonts-100dpi provide the same set of fonts, rendered at > different resolutions; on

Where to file a package-dependency bug?

In current sid, the x-winow-system-core package depends on both xfonts-75dpi and xfonts-100dpi. The package description for xfonts-75dpi includes the note: == This package and xfonts-100dpi provide the same set of fonts, rendered at different resolutions; only one or the other is necessary, but

Package dependency problem with util-linux and slang

Hi all, I am having some trouble resolving a package dependency. I have util-linux 2.12p-4 installed (this is on unstable). It has a PreDepend on slang1a-utf8 (>> 1.4.9dbs-4). I do have slang1a-utf8 1.4.9-dbs8 installed, but this package has been removed from unstable. As far as I ca

aolserver/openacs package dependency problem

Hi there. I'm having a problem installing openacs on my sid system. The problem arises because of bug #84041 with aolserver 3.2-4 which fails during install. To circumvent this problem, I installed aolserver 3.0rc2-4 available in potato. I then attempted to install openacs, which correctly installs

Re: Package dependency issues

Paul McAvoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I submitted this question a while ago, and didn't get much of a response. [... Problems with home made qmail as MTA ...] At least I responded (and you never raised any objections to my solution): || You'd better install the debian package qmail-src, whi

Re: Package dependency issues

* "Damon" == Damon Muller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Damon> This is what I did myself and it worked well. This is off the Damon> top of my head, so you may have to play around a bit, but Damon> basically that's what equivs is for. BTW: Anyone should use the equivs from potato. It is better than t

Re: Package dependency issues

On Fri, Jan 14, 2000 at 05:55:59PM -0800, Paul McAvoy wrote: > I am having a problem in that I am using qmail on my system, and the apt/dpkg > system does not recognize that it fills the dependency of a > mail-transport-agent. So, by default everytime I want to install something > like a mail read

Re: Package dependency issues

Well, you can manually create an entry in the dpkg DB (/var/lib/dpkg/status) with your favorite text editor. If the line "Provides: mail-transport-agent" is in the entry then dpkg will stop complaining. You will also need to put a .list file in /var/lib/dpkg/info. IMPORTANT NOTE: dpkg will think

Package dependency issues

I submitted this question a while ago, and didn't get much of a response. Here goes agai: I am having a problem in that I am using qmail on my system, and the apt/dpkg system does not recognize that it fills the dependency of a mail-transport-agent. So, by default everytime I want to install some

Re: package dependency

[ my `debquery' script ] Right, this is the first update... %) [...] > > ex $STATUSFILE << _EOF_ | cut -d: -f2 > g/^$FIELD:.*\<$PACKAGE\>/ ?Package? p The previous line works better if it replaced by these two: g/^$FIELD:.*\<$PACKAGE\>[^-]/ ?Package? p g/^$FIELD:.*\<$PACKAGE\$/ ?Package? p Th

Re: package dependency

> > Hi, > How do I know if the package is no longer dependent by others? > > for example, if I have a lib-blah package installed, and I want to know > if there are any other packages installed on my system that depends on > this package. > > I don't want to try to r

package dependency

Hi, How do I know if the package is no longer dependent by others? for example, if I have a lib-blah package installed, and I want to know if there are any other packages installed on my system that depends on this package. I don't want to try to remove it

Re: Package dependency problem: a loop?

Either: 1. Use 'apt-get install' 2. Use dselect 3. Use 'dpkg -i' to install both packages at the same time. Bob On Sat, 20 Mar 1999, John wrote: > When I tried to install ppp-pam package I encountered a dependency problem. > The following two packages depend on each other. As a result I can

Re: Package dependency problem: a loop?

Install them simultaneously. Assuming you downloaded the packages by hand: dpkg -i libpam0g-util_0.65-0.9.deb libpam0g_0.65-0.9.deb -Brad On Sat, 20 Mar 1999, John wrote: > When I tried to install ppp-pam package I encountered a dependency > problem. The following two packages depend on each ot

Package dependency problem: a loop?

When I tried to install ppp-pam package I encountered a dependency problem. The following two packages depend on each other. As a result I cannot get them properly installed & configured. If somebody knows the solution, please tell me. TKS. Package: libpam0g-util Version: 0.65-0.9 Section: l

Re: [Hamm Install] package dependency problems

Francois Gouget wrote: > > Hi, > > I downloaded Hamm last night from fp.mi.us.debian.org and I got quite > a lot of package download problems. Packages that seem to have moved > between the ime I selected them and the time I downloaded them. > > Anyway, I have a lot of pa

Re: [Hamm Install] package dependency problems

"Francois" == Francois Gouget?= writes: Francois> (a rather bad name imho), not perl. perl-base Francois> replaces perl which I guess means it provides Francois> it (once the install worked out ok). Or maybe Francois> the package perl provides perl because it is Francois> called perl then. Pack

RE: [Hamm Install] package dependency problems

On Wednesday, June 10, 1998 3:49 PM, Johnie Ingram [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > "Francois" == Francois Gouget?= writes: > > Francois> 5.004.04-2)'. I tried to find another package > Francois> that would provide 'perl' but did not find > > Perl itself provides perl: > > ./hamm/hamm/b

Re: [Hamm Install] package dependency problems

"Francois" == Francois Gouget?= writes: Francois> 5.004.04-2)'. I tried to find another package Francois> that would provide 'perl' but did not find Perl itself provides perl: ./hamm/hamm/binary-i386/interpreters/perl_5.004.04-6.deb Francois> 'libg++' not the one I expected. I could

[Hamm Install] package dependency problems

Hi, I downloaded Hamm last night from fp.mi.us.debian.org and I got quite a lot of package download problems. Packages that seem to have moved between the ime I selected them and the time I downloaded them. Anyway, I have a lot of package problems, 58 packages are in th