Am Donnerstag 09 Mai 2013, 13:26:32 schrieb Ralf Mardorf:
> On Thu, 09 May 2013 13:21:02 +0200, Matthias Nagel
> wrote:
> > Am Donnerstag 09 Mai 2013, 12:59:20 schrieb Sven Joachim:
> >> My suggestion is to try "dpkg --purge ", but I would also like
> >> to know how you got yourself into this si
On 2013-05-09 13:21 +0200, Matthias Nagel wrote:
> Am Donnerstag 09 Mai 2013, 12:59:20 schrieb Sven Joachim:
>> On 2013-05-09 11:41 +0200, Matthias Nagel wrote:
>>
>> > after I had upgraded to Wheezy this week, I ran the command
>> > "apt-show-versions | egrep -v wheezy" and I was suprised to see
On Thu, 09 May 2013 13:21:02 +0200, Matthias Nagel
wrote:
Am Donnerstag 09 Mai 2013, 12:59:20 schrieb Sven Joachim:
My suggestion is to try "dpkg --purge ", but I would also like
to know how you got yourself into this situation.
Mmh, OK. But in this case I need the actual *.deb-file, don't I
Hello,
Am Donnerstag 09 Mai 2013, 12:59:20 schrieb Sven Joachim:
> On 2013-05-09 11:41 +0200, Matthias Nagel wrote:
>
> > after I had upgraded to Wheezy this week, I ran the command
> > "apt-show-versions | egrep -v wheezy" and I was suprised to see the
> > following result:
> >
> > gcc-4.2-base
On 2013-05-09 11:41 +0200, Matthias Nagel wrote:
> after I had upgraded to Wheezy this week, I ran the command
> "apt-show-versions | egrep -v wheezy" and I was suprised to see the
> following result:
>
> gcc-4.2-base 4.2.4-6 installed: No available version in archive
> libbind9-40 1:9.5.1.dfsg.P3
Hello,
after I had upgraded to Wheezy this week, I ran the command "apt-show-versions
| egrep -v wheezy" and I was suprised to see the following result:
gcc-4.2-base 4.2.4-6 installed: No available version in archive
libbind9-40 1:9.5.1.dfsg.P3-1+lenny1 installed: No available version in archive
dobler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I was wondering why there are some small packages that are not upgraded even
>when a new release that fixes some bugs and doesn't bring any new
>incompatibilities is out?
>
>I was thinking of xqf, qstat or mozilla for instance
>
>On the other hand, some very imp
dobler wrote:
> I was wondering why there are some small packages that are not upgraded even
> when a new release that fixes some bugs
If you can replicate the old bug, file a bug report and state
that the new verion X.Y fixes it.
> and doesn't bring an
On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 06:45:45PM +0100, dobler wrote:
> I was wondering why there are some small packages that are not upgraded even
> when a new release that fixes some bugs and doesn't bring any new
> incompatibilities is out?
>
> I was thinking of xqf, qstat or mozilla for instance
Well, s
Hi there
I was wondering why there are some small packages that are not upgraded even
when a new release that fixes some bugs and doesn't bring any new
incompatibilities is out?
I was thinking of xqf, qstat or mozilla for instance
On the other hand, some very important packages that are likely
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marshal Kar-Cheung Wong) wrote:
>> "Jerry" == Jerry J Jaskierny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> thanks, i'd already thought of that. but i'd assume there has
>> to be a more convenient way. debian can't possibly be built on
>> just the packages and dependencies i
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marshal Kar-Cheung Wong) wrote:
>> "Jerry" == Jerry J Jaskierny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> there are several packages included in debian archives that are
>> outdated. instead of installing the outdated ones, in some
>> cases are useless to me, i want to co
You could also try dummy-package, or make-dummy-package, or something
like that (I've forgotten the name, and amd too lazy to go look it
up.) to create a dummy package that satisfies the dependencies that
you need. I never did get around to figuring out how to use it
though.
> "Jerry" == Jerr
thanks, i'd already thought of that. but i'd assume there has to be a
more convenient way. debian can't possibly be built on just the packages
and dependencies it provides.
On 23 Mar 2000, Marshal Kar-Cheung Wong wrote:
> Try downloading the deb source, patching the source, and then using
> dpk
Try downloading the deb source, patching the source, and then using
dpkg-buildpackage or dpkg --build. (Check the man pages.) Make sure
you get the source from the debian website or with apt, if you have
the deb-src lines in sources.list, as it will contain debian
subdirectory in the source tree,
there are several packages included in debian archives that are outdated.
instead of installing the outdated ones, in some cases are useless to me,
i want to compile an updated copy of the source. i'm trying to figure out
how i can compile this source, and let dpkg/dselect know that they've been
i
16 matches
Mail list logo
