Mick Ab wrote:
> In the last few days, a couple of problems have arisen with using the
> Opera browser on a Debian Jessie system.
> Firstly, black rectangles appear on many webpages.
> Secondly, it is no longer possible to attach files to an email -
> nothing happens when the B
In the last few days, a couple of problems have arisen with using the Opera
browser on a Debian Jessie system.
Firstly, black rectangles appear on many webpages.
Secondly, it is no longer possible to attach files to an email - nothing
happens when the Browse button is clicked to find the file
The IP my vpn uses is banned from accessing the Debian Wiki, and I need
to install a flash player in Opera browser. Does anyone have current
instructions for Debian Stretch (9.3)?
Thanks
TL;DR perhaps try http://someonewhocares.org/hosts/
On Thu 22 Jun 2017 at 13:00:35 (-0300), Wellington Terumi Uemura wrote:
> I really recommend that you switch up to Opera and forget about
> Chromium and Firefox for a number of reasons. It uses much less
> resources, native AdBlock,
On 2017-06-22 at 12:53, Wellington Terumi Uemura wrote:
> * Who does it? I use 30 tabs max.
Over the course of the past two years (give or take), I've managed to
reduce my open-tab count on my primary computer to a current count of
only 426 - but my peak was 5,190 simultaneous open tabs. I hope t
he tabs you had open and witch one you want to
recover from.
* I believe your use is very specific, all your history and data are
stored in database format on your ~home/.config/opera.
On 22-06-2017 13:10, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not the OP, but because you use and recommend Ope
I'm not the OP, but because you use and recommend Opera, let me ask a few
questions:
* Have you ever used a really large number of tabs--I mean like 800 or so?
* Does Opera have, hmm, what to call it--a tab interface on the left hand
side--a thing where the tab labels can be neste
kes no difference which of
> the browsers that you use that uses pepper flash, it will still be
> unsupported.
>
> Lisi
That's what I at first thought, but that can't be it. The installed
versions of all that's Chrome on my system hasn't changed since support
stopp
On Friday 13 May 2016 09:44:43 Curt wrote:
> On 2016-05-13, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> > On Friday 13 May 2016 01:39:23 Patrick Bartek wrote:
> >> Guess I'm stuck with the unsupported Chrome. No biggie.
> >
> > Because Chrome is unsupported for Wheezy and 32 bit, pepper flash is
> > unsupported for Whee
On 2016-05-13, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Friday 13 May 2016 01:39:23 Patrick Bartek wrote:
>> Guess I'm stuck with the unsupported Chrome. No biggie.
>
> Because Chrome is unsupported for Wheezy and 32 bit, pepper flash is
> unsupported for Wheezy and 32 bit. It makes no difference which of the
>
On Friday 13 May 2016 01:39:23 Patrick Bartek wrote:
> Guess I'm stuck with the unsupported Chrome. No biggie.
Because Chrome is unsupported for Wheezy and 32 bit, pepper flash is
unsupported for Wheezy and 32 bit. It makes no difference which of the
browsers that you use that uses pepper flas
A couple weeks ago, downloaded deb file for Opera from Opera web site,
and installed. Ran fine. Now it won't. At first, thought is was
my upgrading to openjdk7-jre and icedtea-7-plugin, but found out
one of Chrome's files was the culprit. Opera uses pepperflash
and the Chrome PDF pl
On 10/01/15 11:54 AM, Dr. Jennifer Nussbaum wrote:
Hi, it seems that lst month there was a new stable version of Opera for Linux
released, but for Ubuntu only. One of the Opera devs has a blog about
installing it on non-Debian-based distros
http://ruario.ghost.io/2014/12/19/installing-opera
On 10/01/15 11:54 AM, Dr. Jennifer Nussbaum wrote:
Hi, it seems that lst month there was a new stable version of Opera for Linux
released, but for Ubuntu only. One of the Opera devs has a blog about
installing it on non-Debian-based distros
http://ruario.ghost.io/2014/12/19/installing-opera
On 10/01/15 12:19 PM, Siard wrote:
Dr. Jennifer Nussbaum about instaling Opera 26.0:
Is there a way to install this on Debian. Im running Wheezy.
Just wanted to say that Opera 26.0 installed successfully in jessie,
except for a few minor glitches as you can see here:
http://paste.debian.net
Dr. Jennifer Nussbaum about instaling Opera 26.0:
> Is there a way to install this on Debian. Im running Wheezy.
Just wanted to say that Opera 26.0 installed successfully in jessie,
except for a few minor glitches as you can see here:
http://paste.debian.net/140042/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
Hi, it seems that lst month there was a new stable version of Opera for Linux
released, but for Ubuntu only. One of the Opera devs has a blog about
installing it on non-Debian-based distros
http://ruario.ghost.io/2014/12/19/installing-opera-on-distributions-other-than-debian-ubuntu-or
d apt's advice to try 'apt-get -f install' (without packages)
>> and voilà: all dependencies were neatly solved.
>
> If you want to continue to discuss Opera, please change the subject line,
> as this discussion has nothing to do anymore with claws-mail.
>
>
&
ll' (without packages)
> and voilà: all dependencies were neatly solved.
If you want to continue to discuss Opera, please change the subject line,
as this discussion has nothing to do anymore with claws-mail.
Thanks
--
Jonathan Dowland
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@l
Firefox/Iceweasel > Edit > Preferences > Advanced >
[x] Always check to see if Firefox is the default browser on startup
Opera > [???] >
Ensure that it isn't set up as the default browser
Dunno, but perhaps this will work for you.
Hth,
Ralf
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, em
opens the Icedove e-mail links in
Opera.
network.protocol-handler.app.http;/usr/bin/iceweasel
Any help on this one please, i want to open my links in Iceweasel?
Try with the suggested step listed here:
Default for foreign programs (system-wide)
http://wiki.debian.org/HOWTO/DefaultWebBrowser
opens the Icedove e-mail links in
> Opera.
>
> network.protocol-handler.app.http;/usr/bin/iceweasel
>
> Any help on this one please, i want to open my links in Iceweasel?
Try with the suggested step listed here:
Default for foreign programs (system-wide)
http://wiki.debian.org/H
Hi,
Using Squeeze amd64 6.0.5
Using Icedove 10.0.3
My preferences>Attachments is empty.
Preferences>advanced>Config Editor does not help when I change the
string to /usr/bin/iceweasel still opens the Icedove e-mail links in Opera.
network.protocol-handler.app.http;/usr/bin/icewe
El 2011-02-02 a las 15:23 -0500, Paul Cartwright escribió:
(resending to the list)
> On 02/02/2011 01:53 PM, Camaleón wrote:
>> BTW, I just have installed today (in Squeeze+GNOME) all major browsers,
>> that is: Firefox 4 (beta), Google Chrome and Opera (as part of my web
>&
On Wed, 02 Feb 2011 13:33:33 -0500, Paul Cartwright wrote:
> On 02/02/2011 09:33 AM, Camaleón wrote:
>> It only happens within Opera? Try to launch it with another user that
>> has a clean .opera profile ("gksu opera" will open Opera as "root") and
>>
On 02/02/2011 09:33 AM, Camaleón wrote:
It only happens within Opera? Try to launch it with another user that has
a clean .opera profile ("gksu opera" will open Opera as "root") and check
if the copy/paste weird behaviour remains.
no it does not happen under KDE wi
On Tue, 01 Feb 2011 06:55:07 -0500, Paul Cartwright wrote:
> I have a problem with Chrome not working right. I click on a link & it
> does nothing( something about a plugin missing). So I started up Opera
> 11.01 build 1190. when I get to the page I want, I tried to COPY the URL
&
I have a problem with Chrome not working right. I click on a link & it
does nothing( something about a plugin missing). So I started up Opera
11.01 build 1190. when I get to the page I want, I tried to COPY the URL
& PASTE into an email. Didn't paste. nada,zip, empty. Tried it
On Sun, 02 May 2010 10:06:21 -0300, Marcelo Laia wrote:
> Iceweasel nor Epiphany open google.com.br, but Opera do that in the same
> time. What is wrong?
Sounds like a "browser conspiracy" :-P
No, now seriously, "google.com.br" opens fine here from iceweasel and
e
Hi,
Iceweasel nor Epiphany open google.com.br, but Opera do that in the
same time. What is wrong?
Thank you
--
Marcelo Luiz de Laia
Lages - SC - Brasil (Brazil)
Linux user number 487797
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubs
--- Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 15 May 2008 23:03:51 +0200
> Dexter Filmore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Today I preferenced etch-backports and did a huge
> upgrade, so far all
> > fine but one thing: Opera 9.27 won't play flash
>
On Fri, 16 May 2008 19:51:02 +0200
Dexter Filmore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for the info
>
> Can't dig up the last working version, can someone please mail it or
> provide a link?
Be aware that old versions of Opera will come with security risks, but
if yo
>
> Yeah, it's a problem with Opera 9.27 and Adobe's latest Flash, which
> won't be resolved in the 9.2 versions of Opera. You'll have to do what
> I ended up doing, and move onto the betas of 9.5. Opera 9.5b2 is quite
> good and stable for me, and Flash works
On Thu, 15 May 2008 23:03:51 +0200
Dexter Filmore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Today I preferenced etch-backports and did a huge upgrade, so far all
> fine but one thing: Opera 9.27 won't play flash anymore.
> Iceweasel does, so th eplugin seems fine. Pathes and all appear
Today I preferenced etch-backports and did a huge upgrade, so far all fine but
one thing: Opera 9.27 won't play flash anymore.
Iceweasel does, so th eplugin seems fine. Pathes and all appear correct to me.
Ran strace on Opera and searched the output for open calls on flash, but
nothing.
t that many websites are using (over-using?)
Flash
animations, etc. makes it quite important, at
least to
me, that my browser be Flash-friendly.
Adobe, in their wisdom, decided to only support
gtk
browsers in their latest release, so that has left
Opera (my browser of choice), pretty much
y browser be Flash-friendly.
> > > Adobe, in their wisdom, decided to only support
> >
> > gtk
> >
> > > browsers in their latest release, so that has left
> > > Opera (my browser of choice), pretty much out in
> >
> > the
> >
> >
(over-using?)
> Flash
> > animations, etc. makes it quite important, at
> least to
> > me, that my browser be Flash-friendly.
> > Adobe, in their wisdom, decided to only support
> gtk
> > browsers in their latest release, so that has left
> > Opera (my bro
-friendly.
Adobe, in their wisdom, decided to only support gtk
browsers in their latest release, so that has left
Opera (my browser of choice), pretty much out in the
cold, at least for Opera 9.2x versions and earlier.
Opera is trying to work around this in their 9.50Beta,
soon to be released
their wisdom, decided to only support gtk
browsers in their latest release, so that has left
Opera (my browser of choice), pretty much out in the
cold, at least for Opera 9.2x versions and earlier.
Opera is trying to work around this in their 9.50Beta,
soon to be released.
However, I have noted, the
Hi,
I installed Opera 9.26 in debian, but got following errors, how can I fix it?
opera: [java] There seems to be a preloaded version of Xt.
There is a workaround for this problem in the opera
startup script. If that workaround fails, opera will
most likely crash every time
Hi Jim,
On 1/29/08, hce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Does the opera browser has caches when I view the web pages?
Yes, Opera caches web pages. You'll find them here:
Tools/Preferences/Advanced/History. You can also empty the
cache there.
Have you tried to reload a page/frame.
...
On Mon January 28 2008, hce wrote:
> Does the opera browser has caches when I view the web pages? I am
> using an opera browser in my debian, it works all fine until yesterday
> when I connected the PC to a new purchased one Ethernet port ADSL
> modem. Sometime I could see the whole c
Hi,
Does the opera browser has caches when I view the web pages? I am
using an opera browser in my debian, it works all fine until yesterday
when I connected the PC to a new purchased one Ethernet port ADSL
modem. Sometime I could see the whole configuration page of the modem
by http://10.1.1.1
appolgies, forwarding to the lists
Note: forwarded message attached.
jwlockhart
Registered Linux User #458799
Registered Kubuntu User #19678
this user is penguin powered
Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo
On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 09:41:37AM -, Paul Cager wrote:
> On Tue, January 8, 2008 23:46, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 09:22:58AM -0800, joseph lockhart wrote:
> >>i've been trying to download the DVD images from
> >>
> >>http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/4.0_r2/i386/iso-d
d the images giving me an error on the
>>download after aproximately 24% completion (DVD 1
>>errors at 24% every time, other images are within a
>>percentage or two), resuming the download has only
>>given me an image which does not match the md5 sum.
>>Downloads attempted
on (DVD 1
>errors at 24% every time, other images are within a
>percentage or two), resuming the download has only
>given me an image which does not match the md5 sum.
>Downloads attempted through Opera, Konqueror, and
>Firefox/iceweasel all on a 5MB cable connection. i
>can't
pletion (DVD 1
> errors at 24% every time, other images are within a
> percentage or two), resuming the download has only
> given me an image which does not match the md5 sum.
> Downloads attempted through Opera, Konqueror, and
> Firefox/iceweasel all on a 5MB cable connection. i
On Jan 8, 2008 1:10 PM, joseph lockhart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Maybe you could use bittorrent?
>
> that would be possible, but many isp now make it hard
> to download large torrent files (in a supposed attempt
> to stop movie piracy) so torrent is out, and i admit i
> did not check all the
> Maybe you could use bittorrent?
>
that would be possible, but many isp now make it hard
to download large torrent files (in a supposed attempt
to stop movie piracy) so torrent is out, and i admit i
did not check all the mirrors, though stopping at the
same spot is certianly odd
jwlockhart
Re
ownload after aproximately 24% completion (DVD 1
> errors at 24% every time, other images are within a
> percentage or two), resuming the download has only
> given me an image which does not match the md5 sum.
> Downloads attempted through Opera, Konqueror, and
> Firefox/iceweasel all o
g the download has only
given me an image which does not match the md5 sum.
Downloads attempted through Opera, Konqueror, and
Firefox/iceweasel all on a 5MB cable connection. i
can't wget the images due to a space issue on my end.
need them to go do an install on a computer w/o a good
connectio
t;>>>
This is great.the bully is being confronted by a
little guy who's
tired of being pushed around. I love it! ;)
MS users should be on Opera's side in this too. Some
MS
users I have talked to aren't even aware of what a web
browser is,
they are so locked in to IE. And
http://www.reuters.com/article/technologyNews/idUSL1337269720071213
Hugo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- Angus Auld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- hce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Thanks Mark.
> >
> > That works fine. The only thing when I call the
> > opera from the command
> > line, it has following errors although it still
> &g
--- hce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks Mark.
>
> That works fine. The only thing when I call the
> opera from the command
> line, it has following errors although it still
> works. Should I
> concern that error messages or not?
>
>
> ~$ opera
> ~
On Dec 8, 2007 8:04 PM, hce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks Mark.
>
> That works fine. The only thing when I call the opera from the command
> line, it has following errors although it still works. Should I
> concern that error messages or not?
>
>
> ~$ o
Thanks Mark.
That works fine. The only thing when I call the opera from the command
line, it has following errors although it still works. Should I
concern that error messages or not?
~$ opera
~$ ERROR: ld.so: object 'libjvm.so' from LD_PRELOAD cannot be
preloaded: ignored.
ERROR: ld.
On Tue, 4 Dec 2007 17:48:09 + (UTC)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Mon December 3 2007, Mark Grieveson wrote:
> > Just add the following to your /etc/apt/sources.list, update, and
> > then you'll be able to install opera.
> >
> > deb http://deb.opera.com/o
On Tue December 4 2007, Paul Cartwright wrote:
> > Just add the following to your /etc/apt/sources.list, update, and then
> > you'll be able to install opera.
> >
> > deb http://deb.opera.com/opera/ etch non-free
>
> that doesn't work:
> W: GPG er
On Mon December 3 2007, Mark Grieveson wrote:
> Just add the following to your /etc/apt/sources.list, update, and then
> you'll be able to install opera.
>
> deb http://deb.opera.com/opera/ etch non-free
>
that doesn't work:
W: GPG error: http://deb.opera.com etch Release:
On Mon, 3 Dec 2007 11:29:22 + (UTC)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I tried to install Opera brower packge from the apt-get install, but
> could not find the package? What am I missing?
>
> Thank you.
>
> Jim
Just add the following to your /etc/apt/source
yes... You should download it directly from the opera company website or try
this
ftp://ftp.opera.com/pub/opera/linux/ and then follow the links
The latest stable is 9.24.
I also had to "fix" some issues and found some tips here:
http://mynbook.wordpress.com/2007/11/26/debian-etch
On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 02:39:18AM +0100, Tom Rauchenwald wrote:
> hce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I tried to install Opera brower packge from the apt-get install, but
> > could not find the package? What am I missing?
>
> It's n
hce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> I tried to install Opera brower packge from the apt-get install, but
> could not find the package? What am I missing?
It's not available in Debian, you need to download it from opera.com and
install it with dpkg -i for example.
&g
Hi,
I tried to install Opera brower packge from the apt-get install, but
could not find the package? What am I missing?
Thank you.
Jim
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Aug 31, 2007 at 03:49:13PM -0400, Rick wrote:
> Notice, that Opera can do all of this (email, usenet, rss feeds, irc, web
> surfing, contacts... and more, inside one app, and all at the same time.
> Now that I said that is anyone running Opera using All of its abilities.?
Hi.
P Kapat, 01.09.2007 00:29:
> One thing that annoys me
> is that if you come across a .torrent file on the net, using opera, it
> doesn't give you a option to just download the .torrent file or even
> better open with another application.
Never tried to change that behaviour
On 8/31/07, Rick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Notice, that Opera can do all of this (email, usenet, rss feeds, irc, web
> surfing, contacts... and more, inside one app, and all at the same time.
And also download torrents!!!
> Now that I said that is anyone running Opera u
Notice, that Opera can do all of this (email, usenet, rss feeds, irc, web
surfing, contacts... and more, inside one app, and all at the same time.
Now that I said that is anyone running Opera using All of its abilities.?
and if so, ANY problems have you notice? (corruption?) loss data
Hi Andrei.
Andrei Popescu, 17.08.2007 21:35:
> On Wed, Aug 15, 2007 at 09:25:33PM +, andy wrote:
>> Mathias Brodala wrote:
>>> Hi Manon.
>>>
>>> Manon Metten, 15.08.2007 20:42:
>>>
>>>> I just read in the papers that there
On Wed, Aug 15, 2007 at 09:25:33PM +, andy wrote:
> Mathias Brodala wrote:
>> Hi Manon.
>>
>> Manon Metten, 15.08.2007 20:42:
>>
>>> I just read in the papers that there's a severe vulnerability discovered
>>> in
>>> Opera 9.22,
Mathias Brodala wrote:
Hi Manon.
Manon Metten, 15.08.2007 20:42:
I just read in the papers that there's a severe vulnerability discovered in
Opera 9.22, although the article did not say what. It is fixed in 9.23.
See the changelog[0].
Regards, Mathias
[0] http://www.opera.com
Hi Manon.
Manon Metten, 15.08.2007 20:42:
> I just read in the papers that there's a severe vulnerability discovered in
> Opera 9.22, although the article did not say what. It is fixed in 9.23.
See the changelog[0].
Regards, Mathias
[0] http://www.opera.com/docs/changelog
Hi,
I just read in the papers that there's a severe vulnerability discovered in
Opera 9.22, although the article did not say what. It is fixed in 9.23.
Manon.
On Mon, Aug 06, 2007 at 09:50:37PM +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> Considering that Opera seems to be faster than Iceweasel or Konqueror
> AND it brings additional value with the mail and IRC client it is a
> pretty strong alternative. Right now the only things keeping me back a
On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 12:37:19PM -0400, Rick wrote:
> Thought I would ask, to see if anyone has drop kmail (kde-pim) and switch
> over, to Opera to use it for email, web, IRC, IM, etc
> how does it compare ? any advantages, besides a single app verus multiply
> apps..
>
On Friday 03 August 2007 12:37 pm, Rick wrote:
> Thought I would ask, to see if anyone has drop kmail (kde-pim) and switch
> over, to Opera to use it for email, web, IRC, IM, etc how does it
> compare ? any advantages, besides a single app verus multiply apps.. Kinda
> like th
Thought I would ask, to see if anyone has drop kmail (kde-pim) and switch over,
to Opera to use it for email, web, IRC, IM, etc
how does it compare ? any advantages, besides a single app verus multiply
apps..
Kinda like the idea, of a unified app, that can do it all (within) itself.
Thanks
On Wed, Jul 11, 2007 at 07:20:10AM -0500, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> I know opera in Debian is faster on my two-seater than iceweasel. But
> that is when it reads my wordpress blog. But in most other sites the
> advertisements get in the way and then it is slower again.
So for me
asel/Firefox/Swiftfox in
>> Debian.(may be it is because of Zenwalk's low mem usage). Opera in
>> Debian is faster than Iceweasel/Firefox/Swiftfox in Debian. Opera in
>> Windows is fastest!
>>
>> *Why?* Please clarify!
>>
>
> I doubt that the reas
t is because of Zenwalk's low mem usage). Opera in
> Debian is faster than Iceweasel/Firefox/Swiftfox in Debian. Opera in
> Windows is fastest!
>
> *Why?* Please clarify!
>
> Is it related with Qt vs. Gtk vs. win32something? Or is it related with
> special optimizations?
Paul Johnson wrote:
Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote in Article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted to
gmane.linux.debian.user:
On an unrelated matter I installed Opera on Sid.
It *is* faster than iceweasel.
But because it hasn't got the ease of the adblock extension, that turns
out to be a wash.
Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote in Article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted to
gmane.linux.debian.user:
> On an unrelated matter I installed Opera on Sid.
>
> It *is* faster than iceweasel.
>
> But because it hasn't got the ease of the adblock extension, that turns
> out to
in Debian/Ubuntu.
Firefox in Zenwalk is faster than Iceweasel/Firefox/Swiftfox in
Debian.(may be it is because of Zenwalk's low mem usage). Opera in
Debian is faster than Iceweasel/Firefox/Swiftfox in Debian. Opera in
Windows is fastest!
*Why?* Please clarify!
I doubt that the re
t;> Ubuntu. Firefox in Windows is faster than Swiftfox in Debian/Ubuntu.
>>> Firefox in Zenwalk is faster than Iceweasel/Firefox/Swiftfox in
>>> Debian.(may be it is because of Zenwalk's low mem usage). Opera in
>>> Debian is faster than Iceweasel/Firefox/Swiftfox
be it is because of Zenwalk's low mem usage). Opera in
Debian is faster than Iceweasel/Firefox/Swiftfox in Debian. Opera in
Windows is fastest!
*Why?* Please clarify!
I doubt that the reasons can be given unless they are very obvious. This
whole question of "faster" depends so m
On Wed, 11 Jul 2007 07:20:10 -0500
Hugo Vanwoerkom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I know opera in Debian is faster on my two-seater than iceweasel. But
> that is when it reads my wordpress blog. But in most other sites the
> advertisements get in the way and then it is slower aga
be it is because of Zenwalk's low mem usage). Opera in
Debian is faster than Iceweasel/Firefox/Swiftfox in Debian. Opera in
Windows is fastest!
*Why?* Please clarify!
I doubt that the reasons can be given unless they are very obvious.
This whole question of "faster" depends so m
Zenwalk's low mem usage). Opera in
Debian is faster than Iceweasel/Firefox/Swiftfox in Debian. Opera in
Windows is fastest!
*Why?* Please clarify!
I doubt that the reasons can be given unless they are very obvious. This
whole question of "faster" depends so much on feelin
On Tuesday 10 July 2007 1:58 pm, Jon Dowland wrote:
> > Why are you so anti-tabs? I find tab browsing to be a lot
> > faster and easier to switch between tabs then trying to
> > open multiple windows/instances.
>
> Perhaps his window manager handles tabs for him. It can then
> be confusing to be fa
> Why are you so anti-tabs? I find tab browsing to be a lot
> faster and easier to switch between tabs then trying to
> open multiple windows/instances.
Perhaps his window manager handles tabs for him. It can then
be confusing to be faced with three paradigms: which window,
then which tab in that
On Mon, 09 Jul 2007 21:39:41 +
steef <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On an unrelated matter I installed Opera on Sid.
> >
> > It *is* faster than iceweasel.
> >
> > But because it hasn't got the ea
w mem usage). Opera in
Debian is faster than Iceweasel/Firefox/Swiftfox in Debian. Opera in
Windows is fastest!
*Why?* Please clarify!
Is it related with Qt vs. Gtk vs. win32something? Or is it related with
special optimizations?
Hugo Vanwoerkom yazmış:
> Hi,
>
> On an unrelated matter I i
On Mon, 09 Jul 2007 12:20:33 -0700, Celejar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > On an unrelated matter I installed Opera on Sid.
>> >
>> > It *is* faster than iceweasel.
>> >
>> I have always thought that FireFox was faster than Opera.
>
>
Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
Hi,
On an unrelated matter I installed Opera on Sid.
It *is* faster than iceweasel.
But because it hasn't got the ease of the adblock extension, that
turns out to be a wash.
Hugo
no no no. seamonkey is the fastest.
steef
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [
ArcticFox wrote:
On Jul 9, 2007, at 2:55 PM, Sam Leon wrote:
Matthew K Poer wrote:On Monday 09 July 2007 3:14 pm, Sam Leon wrote:
Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
Hi,
On an unrelated matter I installed Opera on Sid.
It *is* faster
On Mon, 9 Jul 2007 15:45:06 -0400
Gregory Seidman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 09, 2007 at 03:25:40PM -0400, Celejar wrote:
> [...]
> > We discuss this every now and then (I use privoxy), but is there any
> > convenient way to easily add stuff that privoxy misses to its config
> > file
On Jul 9, 2007, at 2:55 PM, Sam Leon wrote:
Matthew K Poer wrote:On Monday 09 July 2007 3:14 pm, Sam Leon wrote:
Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
Hi,
On an unrelated matter I installed Opera on Sid.
It *is* faster than iceweasel.
But because it hasn't got the ease of the adblock exte
1 - 100 of 353 matches
Mail list logo
