On Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 11:42:59PM -0500, Mark Hurley wrote:
>
> Can't locate Debconf/Client/ConfModule.pm in @INC (@INC contains:
> /usr/local/lib/perl/5.6.0 /usr/local/share/perl/5.6.0 /usr/lib/perl5
> /usr/share/perl5 /usr/lib/perl/5.6.0 /usr/share/perl/5.6.0
> /usr/lib/perl5/5.6/i386-linux /us
James D. Freels writes:
> expected like libc, gcc, etc. However, there also was the perl
> packages which have been reported as very buggy. I can't deal with
> that. What is the status of these packages now.
I don't remember problems with perl. Please refresh my memory.
I can also say th
On Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 10:31:25PM -0500, James D. Freels wrote:
> libc, gcc, etc. However, there also was the perl packages which have
> been reported as very buggy. I can't deal with that. What is the
> status of these packages now.
Can't locate Debconf/Client/ConfModule.pm in @INC (@INC con
The main reason I am considering going with the unstable version is to
get the AA fonts in KDE 2.1. I did a "apt-get -d install kde-base"
after enabling the unstable tree and hitting an "apt-get update".
What I found was most of the development packages as I expected like
libc, gcc, etc. However,
James D. Freels writes:
> 1) bite the bullet and upgrade to 'testing' and install the kde 2.1
> packages that have anti-aliasing capability compiled in, or
I came to the belief one debian release ago that the best place to be
was as close as possible to the majority of the developers. This
ex
Sorry if this is a FAQ, but I am not currently subscribing to the list(s). I
am looking for an honest opinion. I currently am a Debian 2.2.r2 (with
several extensions) user. Because of several circumstances among which are:
1) I manually installed Xfree86-4.0.2 over the stable version to get
6 matches
Mail list logo
