On Sun, Apr 23, 2000 at 06:04:49PM +0800, Lindsay Allen wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Apr 2000 kmself@ix.netcom.com wrote:
BTW, no need to cc: me, filters send it all to the same folder anyway.
> > On Sun, Apr 23, 2000 at 11:51:35AM +0800, Lindsay Allen wrote:
> > >
> > > Greetings,
> > >
> > > I have be
On Sun, 23 Apr 2000, Lee Bradshaw wrote:
[ping output snipped]
> > This has occured with different Deb boxes and different ISPs. Seems to me
> > that it is either a ppp bug or a kernel bug but it has persisted over
> > different versions of both.
>
> It may be your isp. I've seen the problem wh
On Sun, Apr 23, 2000 at 06:04:49PM +0800, Lindsay Allen wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Apr 2000 kmself@ix.netcom.com wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Apr 23, 2000 at 11:51:35AM +0800, Lindsay Allen wrote:
>> > mentor:# ping t99
>> > PING t99 t99.xxx.wa.edu.au (192.168.1.99): 56 data bytes
>> > 64 bytes from 192.168.1.99:
On Sun, 23 Apr 2000 kmself@ix.netcom.com wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 23, 2000 at 11:51:35AM +0800, Lindsay Allen wrote:
> >
> > Greetings,
> >
> > I have been bothered for years with this problem and I still have no idea
> > on where to look for the cause.
> >
> > About once a fortnight I get very slo
On Sun, Apr 23, 2000 at 11:51:35AM +0800, Lindsay Allen wrote:
>
> Greetings,
>
> I have been bothered for years with this problem and I still have no idea
> on where to look for the cause.
>
> About once a fortnight I get very slow ppp performance and when I check
> with ping I see the packets
Greetings,
I have been bothered for years with this problem and I still have no idea
on where to look for the cause.
About once a fortnight I get very slow ppp performance and when I check
with ping I see the packets coming back in groups of ~8. Sometimes it
fixes itself but usually I have to h
6 matches
Mail list logo
