On 11/15/18 10:24 PM, Tom D. wrote:
Thank you, Sir. I understand now.
Not quite, you're still top posting. It is frowned upon greatly in these
parts.
--
My father, Victor Moore (Vic) used to say:
"There are two Great Sins in the world...
..the Sin of Ignorance, and the Sin of Stupidity.
Onl
On 16.11.2018 10:48, Greg Marks wrote:
> As of October 2017, I found that running the command "nvidia-detect"
> followed by "install nvidia-driver" (as recommended by the first
> command) conflicted with the lightdm display manager and prevented
> graphical login. Does that problem remain? Sincerel
te: Thu, 15 Nov 2018 21:41:58 -0500
> From: Carl Fink
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: Why has nouveau vs. NVIDIA problem not been addressed?
>
> Note: top-posting fixed, some quotes trimmed.
>
> > On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 2:54 PM Alexander V. Makartsev
>
Thank you, Sir. I understand now.
I am Adrian. So please feel free to call me by that name.
Again thank you for clarification.
Sincerely
Adrian D'Costa
On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 9:42 PM Carl Fink wrote:
> Note: top-posting fixed, some quotes trimmed.
>
> On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 2:54 PM Alexande
Note: top-posting fixed, some quotes trimmed.
On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 2:54 PM Alexander V. Makartsev
mailto:avbe...@gmail.com>> wrote:
I don't understand what are you talking about. There is no need to
do things you describe on Debian manually.
Installation of "nvidia-driver" packa
Thank you for your kind reply. I downloaded the driver from www.nvidia.com
for NVIDIA geforce GTX 678 video card driver.
It was a shell script with sh extension.
So until I blacklist nouveau completely from the Debian OS, Nvidia driver
won't install. As a result, I had to blacklist nouveau comple
On 15.11.2018 23:50, Adrian D'Costa wrote:
> Sorry. I don't want to put anybody down. I love Debian Gnu Linux.
>
> But why isn't there an easier way to disable nouveau-module?
>
> Why do we have to open the black-list file with the text editor like
> nano and blacklist it and sometimes still it isn
That's something that I always wondered about but never got the time to
debug,but:
If you have Nvidia and wants to use their driver on Ubuntu, it's pretty
straightforward and a no-brainer using their (Ubuntu's) driver installation
tool.
If you're using Debian, you very very likely will end up with
Sorry. I don't want to put anybody down. I love Debian Gnu Linux.
But why isn't there an easier way to disable nouveau-module?
Why do we have to open the black-list file with the text editor like nano
and blacklist it and sometimes still it isn't enough?
On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 1:07 PM Dan Rit
Adrian D'Costa wrote:
> I can disable nouveau-module and do a workaround by recompiling the kernel
> and copying the nvidia.ko module to /lib/module and do modprobe nvidia. And
> I am using proprietary NVIDIA driver for Linux on Debian flavours. I found
> this works for my machine.
>
>
> Why can
I can disable nouveau-module and do a workaround by recompiling the kernel
and copying the nvidia.ko module to /lib/module and do modprobe nvidia. And
I am using proprietary NVIDIA driver for Linux on Debian flavours. I found
this works for my machine.
Why can't both of them coexist with each oth
On Thu, 07 Nov 2013 00:26:12 -0500, erosenberg wrote:
> If you don't have an NVIDIA graphics card, then remove the nvidia
> packages:
> * glx-alternative-nvidia * nvidia-driver * libgl1-nvidia-glx and
> instead, install libgl1-mesa-glx. This should allow your INTEL
> card
> to do the 3D accele
If you don't have an NVIDIA graphics card, then remove the nvidia
packages:
* glx-alternative-nvidia
* nvidia-driver
* libgl1-nvidia-glx
and instead, install libgl1-mesa-glx. This should allow your INTEL
card
to do the 3D acceleration.
Darac -
Thanks.
I checked, no Nvidia device.
Did a
On Sun, Nov 03, 2013 at 09:32:23AM -0500, erosenb...@hygeiabiomedical.com wrote:
> [3]erosenb...@hygeiabiomedical.com wrote:
> > I am running jessie/sid.
> >
> > When I boot, prior to the login screen I receive the following
> message: "A
> > problem has occurred and
- Original Message -
From: erosenb...@hygeiabiomedical.com
To:"Darac Marjal" ,
Cc:
Sent:Sat, 02 Nov 2013 21:52:53 -0400
Subject:Re: NVIDIA Problem?
- Original Message -
From: "Darac Marjal"
To:
Cc:
Sent: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 09:42:10 +
Subject: Re: NVI
- Original Message -
From: "Darac Marjal"
To:
Cc:
Sent: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 09:42:10 +
Subject: Re: NVIDIA Problem?
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 12:16:52AM -0400,
erosenb...@hygeiabiomedical.com wrote:
> I am running jessie/sid.
>
> When I boot, prior to the log
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 12:16:52AM -0400, erosenb...@hygeiabiomedical.com wrote:
>I am running jessie/sid.
>
>When I boot, prior to the login screen I receive the following message: "A
>problem has occurred and the system can't recover" .It has been suggested
>to me that the probl
hello
i ve tried to do a :
dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xorg
it ask me few questions
but after the "dri" question, it freezes
it's not due to my answer, i ve tried "yes" and "no" and it's doing the same...
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble
hello
i ve tried to do a :
dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xorg
it ask me few questions
but after the "dri" question, it freezes
it's not due to my answer, i ve tried "yes" and "no" and it's doing the same...
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble
Enrique Morfin wrote:
Hi!
I have a problem wiht 1 box and nvidia card!
kernel 2.6.8 and xfree4.3
When the box boot 1 of 5 times it do it correct, any
problem, but 4 og 5 times, the X doesn't start. In
XFree86.0.log:
(EE) NVIDIA(0): Failed to initialize the NVIDIA
graphics device!
(EE) NVIDI
Hi!
I have a problem wiht 1 box and nvidia card!
kernel 2.6.8 and xfree4.3
When the box boot 1 of 5 times it do it correct, any
problem, but 4 og 5 times, the X doesn't start. In
XFree86.0.log:
(EE) NVIDIA(0): Failed to initialize the NVIDIA
graphics device!
(EE) NVIDIA(0): *** Aborting ***
W
Bayrouni wrote:
Hello,
I have a permanent problem with nvidia driver (propietary one).
When I install it, I can run X server with 3d support.
But when I rebbot or turn on my machine, the X fails.
I repeated the installation many times, and I had the same problem.
I a running sid kernel 2.6.9 and th
On Sat, 01 Jan 2005 23:56:34 +0100, Bayrouni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a permanent problem with nvidia driver (propietary one).
> When I install it, I can run X server with 3d support.
> But when I rebbot or turn on my machine, the X fails.
>
> I repeated the installation many times, an
Hello,
I have a permanent problem with nvidia driver (propietary one).
When I install it, I can run X server with 3d support.
But when I rebbot or turn on my machine, the X fails.
I repeated the installation many times, and I had the same problem.
I a running sid kernel 2.6.9 and the driver is
NV
I have the same no screens problem, and the same
videro card. Have you found anything out yet? if you have please forward the
information to [EMAIL PROTECTED]. If I find
anything out I will do the same. Thanks
On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 11:46:49AM -0700, Jamin W. Collins wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 12:42:06PM -0500, Matt Price wrote:
> >
> > so, no, "nvidia" is not loaded. I tried modprobe nvidia, and got:
> > "modprobe: can't locate module nvidia"
> >
> > I'm using the debian nvidia packages, which
On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 12:42:06PM -0500, Matt Price wrote:
>
> so, no, "nvidia" is not loaded. I tried modprobe nvidia, and got:
> "modprobe: can't locate module nvidia"
>
> I'm using the debian nvidia packages, which I compiled myself to fit
> a self-rolled kernel.
> nvidia-glx is 1.0.3123-4
On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 09:15:01AM -0700, Jamin W. Collins wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 11:44:18AM -0500, Matt Price wrote:
> >
> > Rebooted and x wouldn't start because of a problem with nvidiactl (I
> > have to use the nonfree drivers to make X work at all...).
> >
> > I've tried variouS
On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 11:44:18AM -0500, Matt Price wrote:
>
> came into work today and the computer was crashed dead; don't
> know what the problem was (I'll attach the last few lines of
> /var/log/messages from yesterday; they don't tell me much, though).
>
> Rebooted and x wouldn't start be
hey folks,
came into work today and the computer was crashed dead; don't
know what the problem was (I'll attach the last few lines of
/var/log/messages from yesterday; they don't tell me much, though).
Rebooted and x wouldn't start because of a problem with nvidiactl (I
have to use the nonfree
On Tue, 16 Dec 2003, Paul Johnson wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 05:52:11PM -0800, Alvin Oga wrote:
> > if they went away .. we'd have to bitch about ati/matrox :-0
>
> We already had that argument. Matrox lost. And we had the ATI/3dfx
> d
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 05:52:11PM -0800, Alvin Oga wrote:
> if they went away .. we'd have to bitch about ati/matrox :-0
We already had that argument. Matrox lost. And we had the ATI/3dfx
debate. 3dfx lost.
- --
.''`. Paul Johnson <[EMAIL P
hi ya
On Tue, 16 Dec 2003, Hoyt Bailey wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 07:04:20AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > I've had the same thing; the drivers that I nabbed from nVidia have been
> > > rock-solid and quite functional, whereas the Debian packages...besides,
> > > why is it a 'cra
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 19:49
Subject: Re: yet another NVIDIA problem (4496)
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 07:04:20AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I've had the same thing; the drivers that I nabbed from nVidia have been
> rock-solid and quite functional, whereas the Debian packages...besides,
> why is it a 'crap driver'?
The de
>
> --
> From: Sreelal Chandrasenan
> Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 9:25:22 AM
> To: Debian User (E-mail)
> Subject: FW: yet another NVIDIA problem (4496)
> Auto forwarded by a Rule
>
>
>
-Original Message-
From:
-Original Message-
From: Hugo Vanwoerkom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 7:50 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: yet another NVIDIA problem (4496)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 06:03:03PM -0600, Stewart Jenkins wrote:
>
>>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 06:03:03PM -0600, Stewart Jenkins wrote:
On Saturday 13 December 2003 02:05, Paul Johnson wrote:
That is the crap driver I'm talking about. BTW, you can get it easier
with apt...the nvidia-kernel and nvidia-glx packages are it.
Interesting. I h
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 06:03:03PM -0600, Stewart Jenkins wrote:
> On Saturday 13 December 2003 02:05, Paul Johnson wrote:
> >
> > That is the crap driver I'm talking about. BTW, you can get it easier
> > with apt...the nvidia-kernel and nvidia-glx packages are it.
>
>
>
> Interesting. I had l
On Saturday 13 December 2003 02:05, Paul Johnson wrote:
>
> That is the crap driver I'm talking about. BTW, you can get it easier
> with apt...the nvidia-kernel and nvidia-glx packages are it.
Interesting. I had lots of problems with the two debian packages, but have
had rock solid performanc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, Dec 13, 2003 at 10:34:30AM +0100, Ing. Vladimir M. Kerka wrote:
> > with apt...the nvidia-kernel and nvidia-glx packages are it.
> Can someone tell me where I can find nvidia-kernel-1.0.4496 package for
> installing nvidia-glx?
- From building
On Sat, 2003-12-13 at 09:05, Paul Johnson wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Fri, Dec 12, 2003 at 02:46:11PM +, John Peter wrote:
> > I use the NVIDIA-Linux-x86-1.0-4496-pkg2.run installer from NVidea and
> > just had to execute their instructions, by the letter an
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Dec 12, 2003 at 02:46:11PM +, John Peter wrote:
> I use the NVIDIA-Linux-x86-1.0-4496-pkg2.run installer from NVidea and
> just had to execute their instructions, by the letter and everything
> runs OK.
That is the crap driver I'm talking
Paul Johnson wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Thu, Dec 11, 2003 at 11:52:32AM +0200, Haim Ashkenazi wrote:
>> I originaly thought about bying radeon (9500, or 9700) but when I've
>> searched the mailing list I saw there were a lot of problems with the ATI
>> drivers
Paul Johnson wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 03:24:14PM +0200, Haim Ashkenazi wrote:
I've just bought a new GeForce 5600 (Gainward Ultra 780 TV/DVI) and for that
occasion I've upgraded my nvidia drivers to 4496-10. after upgrading, X
wouldn't start (
On Thursday December 11 at 06:35pm
Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 11, 2003 at 11:52:32AM +0200, Haim Ashkenazi wrote:
> > I originaly thought about bying radeon (9500, or 9700) but when I've
> > searched the mailing list I saw there were a lot of problems with
> > the ATI dr
On Thu, 11 Dec 2003, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 11, 2003 at 11:52:32AM +0200, Haim Ashkenazi wrote:
> > I originaly thought about bying radeon (9500, or 9700) but when I've
> > searched the mailing list I saw there were a lot of problems with the ATI
> > drivers too, so I've decided to stick
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Dec 11, 2003 at 11:52:32AM +0200, Haim Ashkenazi wrote:
> I originaly thought about bying radeon (9500, or 9700) but when I've
> searched the mailing list I saw there were a lot of problems with the ATI
> drivers too, so I've decided to stick w
Haim Ashkenazi wrote:
David Selby wrote:
Haim Ashkenazi wrote:
Hi
I've just bought a new GeForce 5600 (Gainward Ultra 780 TV/DVI) and for
that occasion I've upgraded my nvidia drivers to 4496-10. after upgrading,
X wouldn't start (error loading 'nvidia') unless I modprobe 'nvidia'
manua
Kevin C. Smith wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 11, 2003 at 02:30:55AM +0200, Haim Ashkenazi wrote:
>> Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
>>
>> > Haim Ashkenazi wrote:
>> >> Hi
>> >>
>> >> I've just bought a new GeForce 5600 (Gainward Ultra 780 TV/DVI) and
>> >> for that occasion I've upgraded my nvidia drivers to 4496
Paul Johnson wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 03:24:14PM +0200, Haim Ashkenazi wrote:
>> I've just bought a new GeForce 5600 (Gainward Ultra 780 TV/DVI) and for
>> that occasion I've upgraded my nvidia drivers to 4496-10. after
>> upgrading, X w
On Thursday December 11 at 02:30am
Haim Ashkenazi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I always put Nvidia in /etc/modules.
> for me it always worked without adding it to '/etc/modules'.
>
> any idea about the error?
No, I used to get an error about 'non-gpl code, tainted kernel' or some
such with 436
On Thu, Dec 11, 2003 at 02:30:55AM +0200, Haim Ashkenazi wrote:
> Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
>
> > Haim Ashkenazi wrote:
> >> Hi
> >>
> >> I've just bought a new GeForce 5600 (Gainward Ultra 780 TV/DVI) and for
> >> that occasion I've upgraded my nvidia drivers to 4496-10. after
> >> upgrading, X wou
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 03:24:14PM +0200, Haim Ashkenazi wrote:
> I've just bought a new GeForce 5600 (Gainward Ultra 780 TV/DVI) and for that
> occasion I've upgraded my nvidia drivers to 4496-10. after upgrading, X
> wouldn't start (error loading 'nv
David Selby wrote:
> Haim Ashkenazi wrote:
>
>>Hi
>>
>>I've just bought a new GeForce 5600 (Gainward Ultra 780 TV/DVI) and for
>>that occasion I've upgraded my nvidia drivers to 4496-10. after upgrading,
>>X wouldn't start (error loading 'nvidia') unless I modprobe 'nvidia'
>>manually, and then i
Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> Haim Ashkenazi wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> I've just bought a new GeForce 5600 (Gainward Ultra 780 TV/DVI) and for
>> that occasion I've upgraded my nvidia drivers to 4496-10. after
>> upgrading, X wouldn't start (error loading 'nvidia') unless I modprobe
>> 'nvidia' manually, and
Haim Ashkenazi wrote:
Hi
I've just bought a new GeForce 5600 (Gainward Ultra 780 TV/DVI) and for that
occasion I've upgraded my nvidia drivers to 4496-10. after upgrading, X
wouldn't start (error loading 'nvidia') unless I modprobe 'nvidia'
manually, and then it loads, but with an error:
devfs_re
On Wednesday December 10 at 03:24pm
Haim Ashkenazi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've just bought a new GeForce 5600 (Gainward Ultra 780 TV/DVI) and
> for that occasion I've upgraded my nvidia drivers to 4496-10. after
> upgrading, X wouldn't start (error loading 'nvidia') unless I modprobe
> 'nvid
Haim Ashkenazi wrote:
Hi
I've just bought a new GeForce 5600 (Gainward Ultra 780 TV/DVI) and for that
occasion I've upgraded my nvidia drivers to 4496-10. after upgrading, X
wouldn't start (error loading 'nvidia') unless I modprobe 'nvidia'
manually, and then it loads, but with an error:
devfs_reg
Hi
I've just bought a new GeForce 5600 (Gainward Ultra 780 TV/DVI) and for that
occasion I've upgraded my nvidia drivers to 4496-10. after upgrading, X
wouldn't start (error loading 'nvidia') unless I modprobe 'nvidia'
manually, and then it loads, but with an error:
devfs_register(nvidiactl): cou
On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 10:34:06PM +0100, w-cool wrote:
> I have the following problem, I have transmitted from Slackware to Debian.
> I have problem with quake 3, I have installed drivers nvidia everything
> works well but when I start quake I can see the game only in a small part
> no on a full
Welcome
I have the following problem, I have transmitted from Slackware to Debian.
I have problem with quake 3, I have installed drivers nvidia everything
works well but when I start quake I can see the game only in a small part
no on a full screan.While trying to change resolution it is rejecte
On Sat, Nov 10, 2001 at 10:03:02PM +0100, Victor Julien wrote:
> Hmmm, weird, tried your suggestion, and now it works fine. Even with
> libc6-2.2.4-5. I thought that 'make install' in the nvidia_glx directory
> removed all conflicting files...
>
> Well, everything is fine now.
> Thanx
>
Sorry
Hmmm, weird, tried your suggestion, and now it works fine. Even with
libc6-2.2.4-5. I thought that 'make install' in the nvidia_glx directory
removed all conflicting files...
Well, everything is fine now.
Thanx
On Saturday 10 November 2001 20:54, Dominique Deleris wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Nov 2001
On Sat, 10 Nov 2001 20:40:24 +0100, Victor Julien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Victor> Hi Dominique,
Victor> Since yesterday i had the same problem, i run debian-testing. Going
back to
Victor> libc6-2.2.4-3 solved my problem! So nvidia in combination with libc6
seems to
Victor> be the problem
Hi Dominique,
Since yesterday i had the same problem, i run debian-testing. Going back to
libc6-2.2.4-3 solved my problem! So nvidia in combination with libc6 seems to
be the problem.
Good luck,
Victor
On Friday 09 November 2001 20:25, Dominique Deleris wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Nov 2001 09:46:13 -05
On Mon, 5 Nov 2001 09:46:13 -0500, Mental <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Mental> Hello, I've run accross an odd condition on my debian (unstable) box.
It
Mental> seems that Quake3 is no longer textured properly on my geforce card.
The
Mental> game starts fine. Menu's look ok. Startup screen loads
does your XFree86 config file refer to the right driver - i.e. nvidia, not nv ?
just a though
Shri
--- Mental <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello, I've run accross an odd condition on my debian (unstable) box. It
> seems that Quake3 is no longer textured properly on my geforce card. The
> game
Hello, I've run accross an odd condition on my debian (unstable) box. It
seems that Quake3 is no longer textured properly on my geforce card. The
game starts fine. Menu's look ok. Startup screen loads fine, but in game,
textures are completely wrong. I've reinstalled my GLX and kernel drivers.
I've
On Wednesday 08 August 2001 08:11, Lance Hoffmeyer wrote:
> I am using XFree86 v4.0.1. Does one still use startx? I have been
> typing XFree86 -configfile= <> to start the X server. When I type
> startx it seems that the system tried to run X ver3 which does not
> support my card. At least, it
I am using XFree86 v4.0.1. Does one still use startx? I have been typing
XFree86 -configfile= <> to start the X server. When I type startx it seems
that the system tried to run X ver3 which does not support my card. At least,
it tries to use the XF86Config instead of XF86Config-4.
Maybe sta
On Tue, Aug 07, 2001 at 10:37:00AM -0700, Anthony Lau wrote:
> >I tried putting a .xinitrc with
> >exec wmaker
> >then
> >exec icewm
> >
> >to no avail. Here is my XFree86.0.log
put wmaker in your .xinitrc and run startx. if your
x is set up properly, it will start up. the same for
icewm - no exe
I tried putting a .xinitrc with
exec wmaker
then
exec icewm
to no avail. Here is my XFree86.0.log
Have you tried using a display manager like xdm or gdm?
I also remember you can specify a window manager from command line
with the 'startx', but I don't know what the option is.
(WW) System l
I now have what appears to be a X screen coming up. I get a gray screen
with a functioning mouse. I do not have a WindowManager even though I
set WindowMaker as the primary manager with update-alternatives.
Any suggestions on this problem?
lance
Put a file in your home directory called .xinitrc containing the single line:
exec wmaker
> I now have what appears to be a X screen coming up. I get a gray screen
> with a functioning mouse. I do not have a WindowManager even though I
> set WindowMaker as the primary manager with update-alter
Did I mention I was using XFree86-4.0.1? Version 3 does not
support Gladiac MX.
Lance
On Sat, Aug 04, 2001 at 12:21:53PM -0700, Geoffrey Romer wrote:
> Put a file in your home directory called .xinitrc containing the single line:
>
> exec wmaker
>
> > I now have what appears to be a X scree
I tried putting a .xinitrc with
exec wmaker
then
exec icewm
to no avail. Here is my XFree86.0.log
XFree86 Version 4.1.0 / X Window System
(protocol Version 11, revision 0, vendor release 6510)
Release Date: 2 June 2001
If the server is older than 6-12 months, or if your card is
77 matches
Mail list logo
