Mark Ferlatte said on Tue, May 27, 2003 at 10:23:26AM -0700:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm seeing a large amount of the following message in my syslogs:
>
> ntpd[542]: synchronisation lost
>
> It seems to happen at night, and appears to be persistent. However, ntpq shows
> that the hosts in question know a
> I just posted this same question about a week ago actually. I went
> through and checked the order of servers in my ntp.conf and found that
> the first server on the list was down quite often, so I rearranged my
> list of servers. This has cut down on the number of
> synchronization lost
> messa
On Tue, 2003-05-27 at 12:23, Mark Ferlatte wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm seeing a large amount of the following message in my syslogs:
>
> ntpd[542]: synchronisation lost
>
> It seems to happen at night, and appears to be persistent. However, ntpq shows
> that the hosts in question know about other
Hi all,
I'm seeing a large amount of the following message in my syslogs:
ntpd[542]: synchronisation lost
It seems to happen at night, and appears to be persistent. However, ntpq shows
that the hosts in question know about other NTP servers, and appear to be
setting time from them.
The NIST NT
4 matches
Mail list logo