Hello,
On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 07:52:54PM +0200, Andre Majorel wrote:
> In a nutshell, Virgin Media shut http://homepage.ntlworld.com/
> down without warning.
A poster child for the virtues of serving content you care about
under a domain name you control (as much as one can control a domain
name
On Friday 05 August 2016 15:48:44 Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Friday 05 August 2016 16:40:46 Gene Heskett wrote:
> > As for noticing the announcements, my expiry rules for this list
> > have already nuked the last of those messages just 3 or 4 days ago.
>
> That is hardly Jonathan's fault. Do you acce
On Friday 05 August 2016 13:52:54 Andre Majorel wrote:
> On 2016-08-05 11:40 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > So far, no links have included what I'd call a blow by blow, which
> > resulted in his projects being moved.
>
> It's not in any of the links in his message but in
>
> https://jdebp.eu/about
On Friday 05 August 2016 13:52:54 Andre Majorel wrote:
> On 2016-08-05 11:40 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > So far, no links have included what I'd call a blow by blow, which
> > resulted in his projects being moved.
>
> It's not in any of the links in his message but in
>
> https://jdebp.eu/about
On Friday 05 August 2016 22:46:23 Gene Heskett wrote:
> Or in the present case,
> harassing the OP. Who seems not inclined to clarify what he alluded to
> when he announced both the move and a new version.
Which is a most unworthy occupation. You have been told both answers.
Jonathan has no ne
On Friday 05 August 2016 13:25:43 Andre Majorel wrote:
> On 2016-08-05 12:36 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > Point taken. The pruning is an attempt to keep each individual
> > mailbox readable in a reasonable length of time by kmail. A
> > couple of my folders have no expiry, are over 2Gb in size.
On Friday 05 August 2016 18:25:43 Andre Majorel wrote:
> If you use Kmail, you probably don't use Procmail but it takes
> more than mere logic to stop me from giving unsolicited advice.
I don't often laugh loudly out loud when reading the Debian List. I believe
the acronym is approximately ROFLM
On Friday 05 August 2016 16:40:46 Gene Heskett wrote:
> As for noticing the announcements, my expiry rules for this list have
> already nuked the last of those messages just 3 or 4 days ago.
That is hardly Jonathan's fault. Do you accept only prolific posters?
I am sure that there are those o
On 2016-08-05 11:40 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> So far, no links have included what I'd call a blow by blow, which
> resulted in his projects being moved.
It's not in any of the links in his message but in
https://jdebp.eu/about-the-site.html
In a nutshell, Virgin Media shut http://homepage.n
On 2016-08-05 12:36 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> Point taken. The pruning is an attempt to keep each individual
> mailbox readable in a reasonable length of time by kmail. A
> couple of my folders have no expiry, are over 2Gb in size. It
> takes a good 45 seconds to sort and display the list when
On Friday 05 August 2016 11:59:32 Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 11:40:46AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > As for noticing the announcements, my expiry rules for this list
> > have already nuked the last of those messages just 3 or 4 days ago.
> > If I had future use for someth
On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 11:40:46AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> As for noticing the announcements, my expiry rules for this list have
> already nuked the last of those messages just 3 or 4 days ago. If I had
> future use for something it gets marked and excluded from those rules.
> I'll set tha
On Friday 05 August 2016 09:41:00 David Wright wrote:
> On Thu 04 Aug 2016 at 21:13:19 (-0400), Gene Heskett wrote:
> > On Thursday 04 August 2016 19:34:44 Jonathan de Boyne Pollard wrote:
> > > The whole sorry tale of why is on the new WWW site. The upshot of
> > > it is that nosh and redo are i
On Friday 05 August 2016 08:26:08 Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Thu, 04 Aug 2016, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > On Thursday 04 August 2016 19:34:44 Jonathan de Boyne Pollard wrote:
> > > The whole sorry tale of why is on the new WWW site. The upshot of
> > > it is that nosh and redo are in a
On Thu 04 Aug 2016 at 21:13:19 (-0400), Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Thursday 04 August 2016 19:34:44 Jonathan de Boyne Pollard wrote:
>
> > The whole sorry tale of why is on the new WWW site. The upshot of it
> > is that nosh and redo are in a new place.
> >
> No, it does not offer any explanation o
On Thu, 04 Aug 2016, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Thursday 04 August 2016 19:34:44 Jonathan de Boyne Pollard wrote:
> > The whole sorry tale of why is on the new WWW site. The upshot of it
> > is that nosh and redo are in a new place.
> >
> No, it does not offer any explanation of why you come in here
On Thursday 04 August 2016 19:34:44 Jonathan de Boyne Pollard wrote:
> The whole sorry tale of why is on the new WWW site. The upshot of it
> is that nosh and redo are in a new place.
>
No, it does not offer any explanation of why you come in here with a
megaphone announcing these tools. This l
The whole sorry tale of why is on the new WWW site. The upshot of it is
that nosh and redo are in a new place.
* https://jdebp.eu./Softwares/nosh/
** https://jdebp.eu./Softwares/nosh/source-package.html
** https://jdebp.eu./Softwares/nosh/freebsd-binary-packages.html
** https://jdebp.eu./Sof
18 matches
Mail list logo