Re: nmh configuration

1998-02-11 Thread David Stern
On 11 Feb 1998 10:21:33 +0100, Martin Bialasinski wrote: > David Stern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I've got a hamm system running with smail(3.2.0.100-4), exmh(2.0-1), > > > <= 450 defer '<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>', sender address target > > 'localhost.localdomain' cannot be verified at this ti

Re: nmh configuration

1998-02-11 Thread Martin Bialasinski
David Stern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I've got a hamm system running with smail(3.2.0.100-4), exmh(2.0-1), > <= 450 defer '<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>', sender address target > 'localhost.localdomain' cannot be verified at this time: > verify_sender(): BIND server failure: : Connection refused. (T

nmh configuration

1998-02-11 Thread David Stern
Hi, I've got a hamm system running with smail(3.2.0.100-4), exmh(2.0-1), and would like to configure nmh(0.17-1) so that it uses smail as the local SMTP server (called by inetd), as was implemented in my bo system. I specifically do NOT want nmh to act as the SMTP server, because I have a cus