On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 06:48:59PM -0400, Tom H wrote:
...snip..
>
> I'd check elsewhere. NM seems to have done its job.
>
> What's the output of
>
> ip a
> ip r
> iptables -nL
I put the results of these on http://pastebin.ca/2451440
I only included the parts of iptables -nL
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 01:18:27PM +0530, Kailash wrote:
> On Friday 13 September 2013 10:12 AM, Robert Holtzm wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 12:23:50AM +0100, Sharon Kimble wrote:
> >> On Thu, 12 Sep 2013 14:13:30 -0700
> >> Robert Holtzman wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 10:22:38AM
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 2:27 PM, Robert Holtzman wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 10:14:07AM -0400, Tom H wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 4:59 PM, Robert Holtzman wrote:
>>> On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 07:47:10AM -0400, Tom H wrote:
What's the output of
nm-tool
cat /etc/net
On Friday 13 September 2013 10:12 AM, Robert Holtzm wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 12:23:50AM +0100, Sharon Kimble wrote:
>> On Thu, 12 Sep 2013 14:13:30 -0700
>> Robert Holtzman wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 10:22:38AM -0400, Tom H wrote:
>>>
>>>snip...
Wha
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 12:23:50AM +0100, Sharon Kimble wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Sep 2013 14:13:30 -0700
> Robert Holtzman wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 10:22:38AM -0400, Tom H wrote:
> >
> >snip...
> > >
> > > What's "no-auto-default=00:21:CC:B6:06:8F,"?!
> > >
> > > I'v
On Thu, 12 Sep 2013 14:13:30 -0700
Robert Holtzman wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 10:22:38AM -0400, Tom H wrote:
>
>snip...
> >
> > What's "no-auto-default=00:21:CC:B6:06:8F,"?!
> >
> > I've never seen "no-auto-default=..." before but I'd blame it for
> > your NIC not com
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 10:22:38AM -0400, Tom H wrote:
snip...
>
> What's "no-auto-default=00:21:CC:B6:06:8F,"?!
>
> I've never seen "no-auto-default=..." before but I'd blame it for your
> NIC not coming up automatically since "00...8F" is its MAC address!
That line is comme
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 10:18:55AM -0400, Tom H wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 5:00 PM, Robert Holtzman wrote:
> >
> > To my knowledge nm has always worked with
> > /etc/NetworkManager/NetworkManager.conf as shown above unless something
> > changed managed=true to managed=false. Tried changing t
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 10:14:07AM -0400, Tom H wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 4:59 PM, Robert Holtzman wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 07:47:10AM -0400, Tom H wrote:
...snip...
> >>
> >> What's the output of
> >>
> >> nm-tool
> >> cat /etc/network/interfaces
> >> cat /etc
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 5:00 PM, Robert Holtzman wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 08:15:35AM -0400, Tom H wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 6:28 PM, Robert Holtzm wrote:
>>> On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 04:48:03PM -0400, Patrick Wiseman wrote:
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 4:01 PM, Robert Holtzm wrote
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 10:18 AM, Tom H wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 5:00 PM, Robert Holtzman wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 08:15:35AM -0400, Tom H wrote:
>>> On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 6:28 PM, Robert Holtzm wrote:
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 04:48:03PM -0400, Patrick Wiseman wrote:
>
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 4:59 PM, Robert Holtzman wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 07:47:10AM -0400, Tom H wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 4:01 PM, Robert Holtzm wrote:
>>>
>>> Running updated wheezy on a thinkpad T420i w/ xfce DE.
>>>
>>> With great embarrassment, after stoutly defending nm, et
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 07:47:10AM -0400, Tom H wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 4:01 PM, Robert Holtzm wrote:
> >
> > Running updated wheezy on a thinkpad T420i w/ xfce DE.
> >
> > With great embarrassment, after stoutly defending nm, eth0 no longer
> > connects. This only happens when I run whee
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 08:15:35AM -0400, Tom H wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 6:28 PM, Robert Holtzm wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 04:48:03PM -0400, Patrick Wiseman wrote:
> >> On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 4:01 PM, Robert Holtzm wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Running updated wheezy on a thinkpad T420i w/
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 6:28 PM, Robert Holtzm wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 04:48:03PM -0400, Patrick Wiseman wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 4:01 PM, Robert Holtzm wrote:
>>>
>>> Running updated wheezy on a thinkpad T420i w/ xfce DE.
>>>
>>> With great embarrassment, after stoutly defendin
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 4:01 PM, Robert Holtzm wrote:
>
> Running updated wheezy on a thinkpad T420i w/ xfce DE.
>
> With great embarrassment, after stoutly defending nm, eth0 no longer
> connects. This only happens when I run wheezy. The connection is fine
> when I run the other distros on the hd
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 04:48:03PM -0400, Patrick Wiseman wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 4:01 PM, Robert Holtzm wrote:
> > Running updated wheezy on a thinkpad T420i w/ xfce DE.
> >
> > With great embarrassment, after stoutly defending nm, eth0 no longer
> > connects. This only happens when I ru
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 4:01 PM, Robert Holtzm wrote:
> Running updated wheezy on a thinkpad T420i w/ xfce DE.
>
> With great embarrassment, after stoutly defending nm, eth0 no longer
> connects. This only happens when I run wheezy. The connection is fine
> when I run the other distros on the hdd,
Running updated wheezy on a thinkpad T420i w/ xfce DE.
With great embarrassment, after stoutly defending nm, eth0 no longer
connects. This only happens when I run wheezy. The connection is fine
when I run the other distros on the hdd, squeeze and ubuntu 12.04.
Under wheezy it also happens when th
19 matches
Mail list logo
