On Sun, 6 Jul 1997, Christian Hudon wrote:
>by Debian. You might want to email them about that (i.e. the typo), but I
>guess they probably have heard about it already...
And I heard back from them. You are right. It is was a typo. Guess I
now have an Official "Oficial" Debian 1.3 CD-ROM.
>Fro
On Sun, 6 Jul 1997, Christian Hudon wrote:
>Thanks for the nice words. I'm sure the "oficial" is just a typo. If memory
Could be a typo. However, the way the word "Oficial" (with the quotes) is
printed on the CD, it appears to be intentional.
>by Debian. You might want to email them about that (
On Jul 6, Bob Billson wrote
>
> I am curious what the difference is between the 'Official Debian 1.3' and
> LSL's '"Oficial" Debian 1.3'. I thought I saw something that if the CD
> vendor changes or doesn't use something they can't use the former title.
> What did LSL not use or leave out?
Than
Hi all,
I received my Linux Systems Labs "Oficial" [sic] Debian 1.3 CD-ROM
yesterday. I spent last night doing a new install to a spare hard drive.
Congratulations to the Debian volunteers! You folks did a *really* nice
job with the 1.3 CD!
I did complete floppyless install--and it went with
4 matches
Mail list logo
