lee writes:
> Hi,
>
> any idea why an NFS volume is being unmounted when a VM runs out of
> memory and kills some processes? These processes use files on the NFS
> volume, but that's no reason to unmount it.
>
> Also annoying: The volume doesn't get mounted when booting despite it's
> in /etc/fs
"Andrew M.A. Cater" writes:
> On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 02:48:59AM +0200, lee wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> any idea why an NFS volume is being unmounted when a VM runs out of
>> memory and kills some processes? These processes use files on the NFS
>> volume, but that's no reason to unmount it.
>>
>
> The
marko...@eunet.rs writes:
> Maybe you have "noauto" option?
Nope.
--
Knowledge is volatile and fluid. Software is power.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.de
On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 02:48:59AM +0200, lee wrote:
> Hi,
>
> any idea why an NFS volume is being unmounted when a VM runs out of
> memory and kills some processes? These processes use files on the NFS
> volume, but that's no reason to unmount it.
>
The OOM process killer is not necessarily aw
Maybe you have "noauto" option?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140921053558.GA3731@debian
Hi,
any idea why an NFS volume is being unmounted when a VM runs out of
memory and kills some processes? These processes use files on the NFS
volume, but that's no reason to unmount it.
Also annoying: The volume doesn't get mounted when booting despite it's
in /etc/fstab. I have to log in into
On Thu, Oct 11, 2001 at 03:44:53AM -0400, Timothy Ball wrote:
> I would like to tone down repeative disk usage and would like to share
> /usr/share via nfs... can anyone think of reasons this would be a bad
> idea?
This would be a good idea (why do you think it's called _share_?),
but it won't wor
I would like to tone down repeative disk usage and would like to share
/usr/share via nfs... can anyone think of reasons this would be a bad
idea?
--timball
--
GPG key available on pgpkeys.mit.edu
pub 1024R/CFF85605 1999-06-10 Timothy L. Ball <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Key fingerprint = 8
> >
> > I posted this on comp.linux.os.networking and didn't get any
> > responses. I'm hoping somebody here might be able to help.
> >
> >
> > I want to backup my laptop (thinkpad-wireless) to the tape drive in my
> > server (bear).
>
> Not sure why your nfs isn't working but I'd suggest trying du
On Mon, 2001-09-24 at 06:25, Bob Koss wrote:
>
> I posted this on comp.linux.os.networking and didn't get any
> responses. I'm hoping somebody here might be able to help.
>
>
> I want to backup my laptop (thinkpad-wireless) to the tape drive in my
> server (bear).
Not sure why your nfs isn't w
I posted this on comp.linux.os.networking and didn't get any
responses. I'm hoping somebody here might be able to help.
I want to backup my laptop (thinkpad-wireless) to the tape drive in my
server (bear).
On my laptop, in /etc/exports:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /root]# cat /etc/exports
/
*Grasps at straws*
That all looks good to me. How about /etc/resolv.conf and /etc/hosts?
*Reaches into a hat*
It may just be that sometimes your card switches it's type of transmit
mode when the first few packets go out. My notebook card spams my
console/syslog with a few lines when it switches,
> The kernel should take care of the routing. What is your
> /etc/network/interfaces file look like? Just trying to probe to find a
> possible answer for you.
Here it is:
auto lo
iface lo inet loopback
auto eth0
iface eth0 inet static
address 171.64.93.186
network 171.64.93.0
The kernel should take care of the routing. What is your
/etc/network/interfaces file look like? Just trying to probe to find a
possible answer for you.
--mike
On 07 Aug 2001 10:12:12 -0700, Max Kamenetsky wrote:
> * Michael Heldebrant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [08/07/01 10:06] wrote:
> > Is this a dh
* Michael Heldebrant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [08/07/01 10:06] wrote:
> Is this a dhcp or static machine? I'm wondering if a default route is
> missing before the first mount and gets put in right afterwards. Sounds
> odd with the drivers compiled in. What card is it?
It's a static machine with a 3C
* Michael Heldebrant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [08/07/01 09:59] wrote:
> Are your network drivers compiled in or modules? If modules are they
> autoloaded in /etc/modules?
They're compiled in. I can see the network starting up way before the
portmapper and NFS mount requests are issued. Besides, the
Hi!
Whenever I reboot my system, I get the following error from
/etc/init.d/mountnfs.sh:
RPC: unable to receive, errno: no route to host
The result is that some NFS mount requests fail. The funny thing is
that this happens for only the first directory I try to mount from a
particular host.
npage that comes with the 2.2 release.
I filed a bug against the mount package.
- Forwarded message from Rob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2000 19:47:58 -0700
From: Rob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: nfs mounting from netapp
User-A
Hello,
I'm running Debian 2.2 and I'm having a problem mounting
an NFS share from a NetApp.
I can successfully mount the share ( it is a snapshot
directory ) and browse the tree as root, but I cannot
read all of the files as root.
There is a directory in the share that is owned by
UID 1001. If
Dave Sherohman wrote:
> Adam C Powell IV said:
> > Is there any way to set an NFS timeout so it only tries for, say, five
> > seconds? Or anything else I can do to allow root logins to the clients
> > when the server is down? Otherwise, I have to power cycle and wait for
> > fsck...
>
> From man
Adam C Powell IV said:
> Is there any way to set an NFS timeout so it only tries for, say, five
> seconds? Or anything else I can do to allow root logins to the clients
> when the server is down? Otherwise, I have to power cycle and wait for
> fsck...
From man mount, under the heading "Mount opt
Greetings,
I have /var/spool/mail nfs mounted on my client machines, so users on
the clients can use movemail to get their mail, and so mail sent to the
client machines will go to the universal spool on the server.
Unfortunately, when the server goes down, even root cannot log in to the
clients,
I have just tried to use NFS to mount directories on one of my
Debian boxes so I can transfer things from it to another.
I set /etc/exports on the first machine to show a (ro) permission on
/ for the second machine. I tried that with and without
no_root_squash. I killed and restarted rcp.moun
> "joost" == joost witteveen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
joost> In an attempt to save the world from disaster, Rob Duncan
joost> wrote:
>> I'm having some problems mounting with NFS. The baffling thing
>> is that the client machine (aidan) can happily mount two other
>> d
In an attempt to save the world from disaster, Rob Duncan wrote:
> I'm having some problems mounting with NFS. The baffling thing is
> that the client machine (aidan) can happily mount two other
> directories from the server (miles), but consistently balks on this
> one. Here's what I start with
I'm having some problems mounting with NFS. The baffling thing is
that the client machine (aidan) can happily mount two other
directories from the server (miles), but consistently balks on this
one. Here's what I start with on aidan:
aidan# mount
/dev/hda3 on / type ext2 (rw)
proc on /proc type
clients to function(to certain extent) when server is down.
So just NFS mounting /usr on clients won't work.
I'm leaning toward using cfengine and recursively linking local and NFS
/usr's.
However questions about upgrading packages, /etc directory remain. I would
appreciate any infor
The situation: here at the Monash library, myself and a colleague
are setting up three or four Debian systems. The intention is that,
by NFS mounting /usr, the space required to hold the binaries (not
insignificant at the best of times :-) should be greatly reduced,
along with the redundancy of
I have some networking questions:
1./ In my research group we have a SPARC (running SOLARIS 2.5) station as a
server. Can I NFS mount it's exported disks on my linux box?
2./ When will Debian become available to run on SPARCs? (I hoping to convert
my whole group into Debian users!)
Regards
M
Well some kind soul pi=ointed out that I might have hosts.allow
and or hosts.deny muck up. I zaped them for the moment to see if that was
it.
Now I'm getting the following in /var/log/daemon.log
Nov 3 15:17:24 yogi nfsd[200]: NFS request from koala originated on insecure
port,
On Sun, 3 Nov 1996, Stan Brown wrote:
> I can't get my FreeBSD box to mount ny Linux machines disks.
> My HP's can mount then just fine. Can anyone think of anything that
> might be different about the Linux NFS implemetation ? The FreeBSD
> man page talks about privleged and non-privliged p
I can't get my FreeBSD box to mount ny Linux machines disks.
My HP's can mount then just fine. Can anyone think of anything that
might be different about the Linux NFS implemetation ? The FreeBSD
man page talks about privleged and non-privliged ports. I don't understand,
I would have thou
32 matches
Mail list logo
