On Sunday 15 February 2004 01:28, Paul Johnson wrote:
> Ah. OK. Is all this listed someplace and I somehow overlooked it?
F10;help; user manual - scroll down to the section on searching
--
Alan Chandler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "un
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, Feb 15, 2004 at 01:21:53AM +, Alan Chandler wrote:
> On Sunday 15 February 2004 00:14, Paul Johnson wrote:
>
> >
> > That only finds package names, doesn't bother searching descriptions.
> >
> /~d
>
> will find the next package with "
On Sunday 15 February 2004 00:14, Paul Johnson wrote:
>
> That only finds package names, doesn't bother searching descriptions.
>
/~d
will find the next package with "" in the description
\ will move to the next occurance
--
Alan Chandler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, Feb 14, 2004 at 11:35:16PM +, Alan Chandler wrote:
> not sure what you mean since I don't use apt-cache
>
> You can search for packages by typing
> / followed by the initial characters of the package name - it searches as you
> type. The
On Saturday 14 February 2004 21:31, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On the other hand, there doesn't seem to be a good way to do an
> apt-cache search from within aptitude.
not sure what you mean since I don't use apt-cache
You can search for packages by typing
/ followed by the initial characters of the
On Sat, 14 Feb 2004 13:28:50 -0800
Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 13, 2004 at 08:46:10PM -0600, Jacob S. wrote:
> > Apt-get by itself is years beyond what rpm was, when I played around
> > with it.
>
> Well, that's comparing an apple to an orange, as well. apt-get would
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, Feb 14, 2004 at 02:33:32PM +, Alan Chandler wrote:
> I used to use dselect quite a lot to search for packages - that was
> until I found aptitude. Now I would live without it - the advantage
> over the command line tools is that you can br
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Feb 13, 2004 at 08:46:10PM -0600, Jacob S. wrote:
> Apt-get by itself is years beyond what rpm was, when I played around
> with it.
Well, that's comparing an apple to an orange, as well. apt-get would
be closest to the cheap knockoff, apt-rpm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Feb 13, 2004 at 08:12:28PM -0600, Jacob S. wrote:
> Enjoy your new Debian machine! Oh, and if you have a decent 'net
> connection, use apt-get from your nearest mirror to download the extra
> packages you want... much easier than downloading/bu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 09:25:17PM -0500, Marty Landman wrote:
> I've just installed Woody from the mini-iso on a PI-166/32M ram/6GB ide
> with a netgear FS310TX nic installed. The light from the cable on my lan
> switch is lit but I couldn't find th
On Saturday 14 February 2004 02:46, Jacob S. wrote:
...
> If you want something to hold your hand a little
> more than apt-get, try aptitude (or so I'm told... I learned apt-get and
> never felt like changing. Apt-get by itself is years beyond what rpm
> was, when I played around with it.) There's
On Fri, 13 Feb 2004 21:32:12 -0500
Marty Landman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 09:12 PM 2/13/2004, Jacob S. wrote:
>
> >I thought for sure you had said it was a Netgear card...
>
> 'Tis... fa310tx to be exact. Apparently it works with the tulip driver
> just fine, got 'top' running on an ssh s
At 09:12 PM 2/13/2004, Jacob S. wrote:
I thought for sure you had said it was a Netgear card...
'Tis... fa310tx to be exact. Apparently it works with the tulip driver just
fine, got 'top' running on an ssh session as I write this -- watching my
new debian box do essentially nothing at the moment
On Fri, 13 Feb 2004 18:10:14 -0500
Marty Landman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 10:44 PM 2/12/2004, Jacob S. wrote:
>
> >Older 3coms are probably the easiest to recognize and install, of all
> >the network cards I've known.
>
> Ironic; with MS products I'm finding just the opposite i.e. older
>
At 06:10 PM 2/13/2004, Marty Landman wrote:
What else do you recommend and where can I d/l it from?
Nevermind, I found the doc page :)
Will post back with any details I can't figure out.
Marty Landman Face 2 Interface Inc 845-679-9387
This Month's New Quiz --- Past Superbowl Winners
Make a Web
At 10:44 PM 2/12/2004, Jacob S. wrote:
Older 3coms are probably the easiest to recognize and install, of all the
network cards I've known.
Ironic; with MS products I'm finding just the opposite i.e. older stuff is
deprecated. This very same nic model is installed on my wife's w98
workstation an
On Thu, 12 Feb 2004 22:16:22 -0500
Marty Landman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 09:46 PM 2/12/2004, Jacob S. wrote:
>
> >First, check to make sure you have the kernel module for your NIC
> >installed. "lsmod" will show you all the kernel modules currently
> >loaded.
>
> lockd / sunrpc / nls_cp
At 09:46 PM 2/12/2004, Jacob S. wrote:
First, check to make sure you have the kernel module for your NIC
installed. "lsmod" will show you all the kernel modules currently loaded.
lockd / sunrpc / nls_cp437 / pcmcia_core / af_packet / unix
You might also check "dmesg" for any output concerning yo
On Thu, 12 Feb 2004 21:25:17 -0500
Marty Landman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've just installed Woody from the mini-iso on a PI-166/32M ram/6GB
> ide with a netgear FS310TX nic installed. The light from the cable on
> my lan switch is lit but I couldn't find the nic on the config list,
> and att
I've just installed Woody from the mini-iso on a PI-166/32M ram/6GB ide
with a netgear FS310TX nic installed. The light from the cable on my lan
switch is lit but I couldn't find the nic on the config list, and attempting
ifconfig eth0 192.168.0.3 netmask 255.255.255.0 up
fails with 'no such de
20 matches
Mail list logo
