new version of apt-move doesn't like new samba packages

2002-10-27 Thread John Covici
Hi. I just did an upgrade and found myself with a new version of apt-move with incompatible changes from previous versions. I did an apt-move fsck and then an apt-moveget which worked ok. When I tried an apt-move move it skipped a number of packages including the newest samba packages which I h

new samba

2001-07-11 Thread John Griffiths
Hi guys, I'm running debian 2.2r3 but i've got samba 2.2.0a compiled from unstable #apt-get -b source samba with deb-src ftp://ftp.us.debian.org/debian unstable main contrib non-free in my sources list I want to get the new samba 2.2.1 as the samba team have said its recomm

Re: nmbd broken in new samba server

2000-02-24 Thread aphro
yeah it makes it so everyone can access it. you just gotta change the interfaces option to suite the needs, i dont have your last email, if you cant get it working give me the ip address of the client machine(unless its localhost) and output of 'ifconfig -a' on the machine. on my machine: interf

Re: nmbd broken in new samba server

2000-02-23 Thread Patrick Kirk
Aphro, Spot on! Removing the interface binding means it works but I assume this means everyone on the Internet has access to the share which is not what I wanted. smb.conf reads : #Global parameters debug level = 3 netbios name = gateway workgroup = workgroup server string = %h server (Debian) #

Re: nmbd broken in new samba server

2000-02-23 Thread aphro
On Wed, 23 Feb 2000, Patrick Kirk wrote: patric >gateway:/home/patrick# smbclient -L gateway patric >Client started (version 2.0.5a). patric >resolve_name: Attempting lmhosts lookup for name gateway<0x20> patric >resolve_name: Attempting host lookup for name gateway<0x20> patric >Connecting to 192

nmbd broken in new samba server

2000-02-23 Thread Patrick Kirk
Hi all, I just got to step 3 of the samba diagnostics when I found my problem. gateway:/home/patrick# smbclient -L gateway Client started (version 2.0.5a). resolve_name: Attempting lmhosts lookup for name gateway<0x20> resolve_name: Attempting host lookup for name gateway<0x20> Connecting to 192

Re: please help with new samba

2000-02-22 Thread Rick Macdonald
On Mon, 21 Feb 2000, Chris R. Martin wrote: > thanks for the file.. unfortunately it didn't solve my problem. > > The big thing I want to get rid of is the password to connect to "IPC$".. I > don't understand why Win98 keeps prompting for that. Also I want the shares > to be "publically" browsa

Re: please help with new samba

2000-02-19 Thread Rick Macdonald
On Sat, 19 Feb 2000, Chris R. Martin wrote: > I upgraded my samba package to frozen (2.0.6), and now it doesn't work with > my old smb.conf file. I've been up and down the samba docs and I've tried > all sorts of options which don't seem to have any effect (which probably > means I'm missing so

please help with new samba

2000-02-19 Thread Chris R. Martin
I upgraded my samba package to frozen (2.0.6), and now it doesn't work with my old smb.conf file. I've been up and down the samba docs and I've tried all sorts of options which don't seem to have any effect (which probably means I'm missing something basic). I can't even list the shares on the

setting up new samba

2000-02-05 Thread Chris R. Martin
I recently installed the 2.0.5a-1 version of samba, and now I've seemed to lost access to shares stored on this machine from my win98 boxes. I'm using the same smb.conf file, but windoze either says "no permission to access resources" or asks for a password for "//SERVER/$IPC" or something like

Re: NEW Samba + Printer woes

1999-05-09 Thread Wayne Topa
Subject: Re: NEW Samba + Printer woes Date: Sun, May 09, 1999 at 02:36:22PM +0200 In reply to:Michael Steiner Quoting Michael Steiner([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > The printcap is designed to work with a remote printer, e.g. I use such > an entry for a hplj with a build-in et

Re: NEW Samba + Printer woes

1999-05-09 Thread Michael Steiner
Wayne Topa wrote: > > Subject: NEW Samba + Printer woes > Date: Sat, May 08, 1999 at 05:13:32PM + > > In reply to:Jose L Gomez Dans > > Quoting Jose L Gomez Dans([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > Hi! > > I've finally installed samba

Re: NEW Samba + Printer woes

1999-05-08 Thread Wayne Topa
Subject: NEW Samba + Printer woes Date: Sat, May 08, 1999 at 05:13:32PM + In reply to:Jose L Gomez Dans Quoting Jose L Gomez Dans([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > Hi! > I've finally installed samba + lprng on an ageing i386. I have two > parallel ports, and a print

[ERROR!] NEW Samba + Printer woes

1999-05-08 Thread Jose L Gomez Dans
In my previous message, I actually sent the wrong printcap. Sorry for the large overhead :-/// The printcap I am using is: # # Copyright (c) 1983 Regents of the University of California. # All rights reserved. # # Redistribution and use in source and binary forms are permitted # pro

NEW Samba + Printer woes

1999-05-08 Thread Jose L Gomez Dans
Hi! I've finally installed samba + lprng on an ageing i386. I have two parallel ports, and a printer attached to each. I'm using debian hamm. This is /etc/printcap: # # Copyright (c) 1983 Regents of the University of California. # All rights reserved. # # Redistribution and use in source an

New samba problems

1996-10-29 Thread Leszek Gerwatowski
Hallo! I've one problem: I used to work with samba 1.9.16alpha10 . Everything was fine except one thing - after some time started new samba daemons (I was running it as a daemon, not from inetd) and they ate my CPU - idle was << 1% and load average after 1-2 hours was about 3.00-