On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 11:00:14AM +0200, Jochen Schulz wrote:
> Kevin Mark:
> > On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 02:04:49PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > >
> > > If all I need are the 1st 3 or 4 CD's, then what is on the other 10 CD's,
> > > just a whole lot of software? Is there a breakdown somewh
Kevin Mark:
> On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 02:04:49PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > If all I need are the 1st 3 or 4 CD's, then what is on the other 10 CD's,
> > just a whole lot of software? Is there a breakdown somewhere of what is
> > on each CD?
Unfortunately, there is no list which pac
On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 02:04:49PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Thanks... I'm still new. I'm thankful for people like yourself that help
> people like me out. This is a lesson that I DEFINITELY WILL NOT FORGET.
>
> If all I need are the 1st 3 or 4 CD's, then what is on the other 10 CD's,
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks... I'm still new. I'm thankful for people like yourself that help
people like me out. This is a lesson that I DEFINITELY WILL NOT FORGET.
If all I need are the 1st 3 or 4 CD's, then what is on the other 10 CD's,
just a whole lot of software? Is there a breakdo
Thanks... I'm still new. I'm thankful for people like yourself that help
people like me out. This is a lesson that I DEFINITELY WILL NOT FORGET.
If all I need are the 1st 3 or 4 CD's, then what is on the other 10 CD's,
just a whole lot of software? Is there a breakdown somewhere of what is
on
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
> Now that I'm using my brain, I have yet another ?. The Debian 3.1r0 has
> 14 iso's. I downloaded them all except for the last one.
Why did you do that? Doesn't the computer you wanted to install sarge on
have access the the internet? -Even then, you probably need at most t
Thanks J. :o) ... You won't believe what I did (lol) I was using my
old Debian CD's
Now that I'm using my brain, I have yet another ?. The Debian 3.1r0 has
14 iso's. I downloaded them all except for the last one. During the
install Debian asks to scan the CD's.
Do I need to scan all
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>
> I downloaded the iso's yesterday after getting an email that Debian
> GNU/Linux3.1 was released. I aborted the install When I reinserted
> Disk-1 to start the install over, I noticed that there was no option to
> install bf24. I want to install with all the latest kern
I downloaded the iso's yesterday after getting an email that Debian
GNU/Linux3.1 was released. I aborted the install When I reinserted
Disk-1 to start the install over, I noticed that there was no option to
install bf24. I want to install with all the latest kernel additions.
How do I get t
Lee Braiden wrote:
>On Tuesday 17 May 2005 09:10, j smith wrote:
>
>
>>in this new release, i have to type "mount /dev/hda5
>>/dos" each time i start Debian. "mount /dos" does not
>>work, error message says "Mount: /dos is not a blo
On Tuesday 17 May 2005 09:10, j smith wrote:
> in this new release, i have to type "mount /dev/hda5
> /dos" each time i start Debian. "mount /dos" does not
> work, error message says "Mount: /dos is not a block
> device", though fstab is properly configed,
in this new release, i have to type "mount /dev/hda5
/dos" each time i start Debian. "mount /dos" does not
work, error message says "Mount: /dos is not a block
device", though fstab is properly configed, see
attachment
another problem with kernel (see below for ker
Hi all,
Does any one know if there is a deb of the 0.8.4 version of Kopete? I
need it because it fixes problems with the Yahoo login.
Thanks
Ralph
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ralph Crongeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Does any one know if there is a deb of the 8.4 version of Kopete? I need
> it because it fixes problems with the Yahoo login.
No. Given that Kopete is not yet to 1.0 and the current rate of
development, I would say you can expect 8.4 to release somet
Hi all,
Does any one know if there is a deb of the 8.4 version of Kopete? I need
it because it fixes problems with the Yahoo login.
Thanks
Ralph
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
peteredhair wrote:
>I'm using apt-get to install packages from the testing distribution.
>Everything installs and runs ok.
>
>What i'm wondering is when the testing distro and all it's packages turn into stable
>will i be able to "convert" all the packages i've installed on my system from testing
On (18/03/04 10:05), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'm using apt-get to install packages from the testing distribution.
> Everything installs and runs ok.
>
> What i'm wondering is when the testing distro and all it's packages turn into stable
> will i be able to "convert" all the packages i've inst
I'm using apt-get to install packages from the testing distribution.
Everything installs and runs ok.
What i'm wondering is when the testing distro and all it's packages turn into stable
will i be able to "convert" all the packages i've installed on my system from testing
into stable ?
If so ho
Beautiful! I got some errors doing apt-get
dist-upgrade but running dselect (twice) it looks like
everything is working. I have newfound respect for
dselect and love Debian even more! Thanks guys/girls,
you've been so helpful!
Now it's time to get X working...
--- Antonio Rodr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Sat, 18 Oct 2003 16:14:48 -0400
Bijan Soleymani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 18, 2003 at 11:02:12AM -0700, Paul Burkett wrote:
> > Basically, I have Debian Woody (3.0) CDs and since I
> > didn't want to burn a new CD for unstable, I went
> > ahead and installed it. Now what I want t
Sweet! Thanks man, just wanted to make sure I wasn't
gonna break anything :P (Not that I really care since
this is my desktop/test server.)
--- Bijan Soleymani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 18, 2003 at 11:02:12AM -0700, Paul
> Burkett wrote:
> > Basically, I have Debian Woody (3.0) CDs
On Sat, Oct 18, 2003 at 11:02:12AM -0700, Paul Burkett wrote:
> Basically, I have Debian Woody (3.0) CDs and since I
> didn't want to burn a new CD for unstable, I went
> ahead and installed it. Now what I want to know is,
> how do I upgrade to unstable? Is it a matter of adding
> APT::Default-Rele
PS, sorry for the formatting of this email :(
--- Paul Burkett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Basically, I have Debian Woody (3.0) CDs and since I
> didn't want to burn a new CD for unstable, I went
> ahead and installed it. Now what I want to know is,
> how do I upgrade to unstable? Is it a matter
Basically, I have Debian Woody (3.0) CDs and since I
didn't want to burn a new CD for unstable, I went
ahead and installed it. Now what I want to know is,
how do I upgrade to unstable? Is it a matter of adding
APT::Default-Release "testing"; to /etc/apt.conf, and
adding unstable to the sources.list
On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 09:59:41AM -0600, Paul E Condon wrote:
> But, I'l be asking some questions on this list about some things that
> seem to be different from woody, and seem to me to be inferrior design.
debian-installer is a complete rewrite from scratch, so it's not
surprising that some thi
On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 05:50:55AM -0400, Antonio Rodr)tonio wrote:
> On Tue, 07 Oct 2003 09:09:02 +0100
> Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 04:05:41PM +0900, Bengt Thure'e wrote:
> > > Me not beeing an developer I do not quite know if we are on track
> > > for
On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 05:50:55AM -0400, Antonio Rodr)tonio wrote:
> On Tue, 07 Oct 2003 09:09:02 +0100
> Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 04:05:41PM +0900, Bengt Thure'e wrote:
> > > Me not beeing an developer I do not quite know if we are on track
> > > for the
On Tue, 07 Oct 2003 09:09:02 +0100
Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 04:05:41PM +0900, Bengt Thure'e wrote:
> > Me not beeing an developer I do not quite know if we are on track
> > for the release in December.
>
> It is as yet unclear. I suspect it might slip a b
On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 04:05:41PM +0900, Bengt Thure'e wrote:
> Me not beeing an developer I do not quite know if we are on track for
> the release in December.
It is as yet unclear. I suspect it might slip a bit; on the other hand
debian-installer seems to be going quite well.
> It still seem
Hej Guys,
Me not beeing an developer I do not quite know if we are on track for
the release in December.
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2003/debian-devel-announce-200308/msg00010.html
Could someone who knows perhaps enlighten me, and others on this list.
At least I am very eagerl
On Sunday 30 December 2001 04:44, Jeffrey W. Baker wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Dec 2001, csj wrote:
> > On Saturday 29 December 2001 06:59, Jeffrey W. Baker wrote:
> > > The funny thing about dillo is that people frequently say "...
> > > Dillo ... faster than Mozilla ..." But, it isn't true! I've
> > >
On Sun, 30 Dec 2001, csj wrote:
> On Saturday 29 December 2001 06:59, Jeffrey W. Baker wrote:
> > The funny thing about dillo is that people frequently say "... Dillo
> > ... faster than Mozilla ..." But, it isn't true! I've observed
> > that, on my machine, Mozilla actually accesses and rende
On Saturday 29 December 2001 06:59, Jeffrey W. Baker wrote:
> The funny thing about dillo is that people frequently say "... Dillo
> ... faster than Mozilla ..." But, it isn't true! I've observed
> that, on my machine, Mozilla actually accesses and renders every page
> I tried more quickly than D
I noticed that the new release of dillo has been packaged up for unstable.
It's a fun little browser, and it certainly does enough of the job so that
you can read many web pages. It even does a semi-reasonable job of
complicated sites like zeldman.com and w3.org. And, it does it all
with o
NAS Marketing wrote:
> Upgrade Prices
> ==
I wonder if they will offer a cross-grade/trade-in, i might giv'em g77
;-)
gk
Dear support customer,
As a previous user of our customer support service, we hope you would be
interested
to know that Release 2.22a of our FortranPlus F95 compiler is
now shipping.
This new release has substantial enhancements to the Student Pack capability,
and to the support software
e seems like a good time
>to jump. Does anyone know roughly when the new release might
>happen - are we talking weeks, months...?
Try having a look at the archives of the debian-release mailing list on
Debian's website. It'll take at least another test cycle, so potentially
just
Hi!
I've been lurking on this list for a few days, as a preliminary to
making the leap from Mandrake to Debian - getting the feel of the
"community". It feels good!
The imminent arrival of a new stable release seems like a good time
to jump. Does anyone know roughly when the ne
Approximately when should we expect the new release? And what kernel is
it expected to have?
Thanks,
Antonio.
When should we expect to have the new Debian release?
Thanks,
Antonio.
> After Potato, *please* limit the scope of the feature changes that
> will take place before a new release. A 3-4 month cycle seems more
> appropriate to this kind of development. Make your goals more modest!
> Debian is already the best linux distro I have seen, with the only
> d
will take place before a new release. A 3-4 month cycle seems more
appropriate to this kind of development. Make your goals more modest!
Debian is already the best linux distro I have seen, with the only
drawback that is is *many* months behind the newest features (if you
stick with a "stable&quo
What packages are you referring to that are outdated? XF86 is, so compile
your own(i have been for ages), kde,gnome ..so compile yer own..again ive
done this too..makes my slink system quite happy.
ive already decided im NOT going to upgrade any debian systems from slink
to potato that are not use
On Sun, Nov 14, 1999 at 10:47:10PM -0500, Tim Webster wrote:
> I have continued to use debian despite the fact that it has grown extremely
> out date.
In what way?
The software in it is old, although not too old. Does it still work?
My slink systems still run happily.
Hamish
--
Hamish Moffatt
Fabien Ninoles writes:
> That's why I download by night [which cost nothing here].
We have only one phone line, which I cannot tie up for hours at a time,
even at night.
--
John HaslerThis posting is in the public domain.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Do with it what you will.
Danc
John Hasler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Noah L. Meyerhans writes:
> > You know, you had merely to ask on the list about making your
> > installation of debian less out-dated.
>
> I believe he made it quite clear that he can't get past the Debian spam
> filters.
>
> > apt-get dist-upgrade
>
>
Jesse writes:
> What I'd really like to see is more frequent incremental releases of
> Stable, bug/security fixes and updates only. Say once each month.
I'd like to see the package-pool system implemented.
> Encourage developers to maintain Stable versions of their packages as
> long as possible
On Mon, Nov 15, 1999 at 05:01:53PM +1100, Matthew Dalton wrote
> George Bonser wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, 14 Nov 1999, Tim Webster wrote:
> >
> > > I have continued to use debian despite the fact that it has grown
> > > extremely out date.
> > > However failing to release a mini potato at this time,
Godric wrote:
>
> This IMHO is problem of marketing Debs - of people like us who support
> Debs making the public aware of just how good Debs is and how easy to
> upgrade.
The point is that people do realise that it is easy, but they're still
not ready to give up their redhat et al because a CD
On 11/15/99, John Hasler scribbled about "Re: New release over due":
> We are required to build and test our packages for unstable.
>
> However, it is a myth that you must upgrade to unstable before installing
> any packages anything from unstable.
>
I'm not opp
Matthew Dalton writes:
> You might ask "So why didn't the developer compile Slink deb's as well?".
Because he would have to have a special Slink machine just for that, and
because there is nowhere for him to upload a Slink package.
> I suspect that developers like to have the latest libraries etc
On Sun, 14 Nov 1999, Tim Webster wrote:
tdwebs >I have continued to use debian despite the fact that it has grown
extremely out date.
tdwebs >However failing to release a mini potato at this time, has forced me to
drop
tdwebs >debian.
i dont get what your so antsy about not upgrading. if there
On Mon, 15 Nov 1999, Matthew Dalton wrote:
> George Bonser wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, 14 Nov 1999, Tim Webster wrote:
> >
> > > I have continued to use debian despite the fact that it has grown
> > > extremely out date.
> > > However failing to release a mini potato at this time, has forced me to
>
I would argue that you CAN upgrade Debian from CD, it's just not as simple
as the installation for Slink. In fact, my procedure involves Slink itself.
1) Install Debian Slink from floppy or CD.
Do not use the computer "type" templates or dselect to choose your
packages. Instead,
IMHO using linux gives you the opportunity to update only if you do want
it. I am running hamm at home, slink in the office, and I am content with
them. You can have the lates packages one-by one, but I guess it is very
rare when you are forced really to upgrade.
BTW people with slow TCP/IP conne
> Neo-fandangled-SuperVision2000 video card which is not supported in
> Debian Slink, so they opt to use RedHat 6.1 instead. This kind of thing
> is increasinly giving the public the impression that Linux is indeed
> forking and that "RedHat is better because it supports more hardware
> than Debia
Godric wrote:
>
> Matthew Dalton wrote:
> >
>
> > The problem is not that Debian itself is out of date. The problem is
> > that you can't get an upgraded Debian on CD. Not everyone wants to
> > download hundreds of megabytes over their 33.6kbps connection to upgrade
> > their systems to the lates
George Bonser wrote:
>
> On Mon, 15 Nov 1999, Matthew Dalton wrote:
>
> > The problem is not that Debian itself is out of date. The problem is
> > that you can't get an upgraded Debian on CD. Not everyone wants to
> > download hundreds of megabytes over their 33.6kbps connection to upgrade
> > th
Matthew Dalton wrote:
>
> The problem is not that Debian itself is out of date. The problem is
> that you can't get an upgraded Debian on CD. Not everyone wants to
> download hundreds of megabytes over their 33.6kbps connection to upgrade
> their systems to the latest stuff.
>
> It seems that D
George Bonser wrote:
>
> On Sun, 14 Nov 1999, Tim Webster wrote:
>
> > I have continued to use debian despite the fact that it has grown extremely
> > out date.
> > However failing to release a mini potato at this time, has forced me to drop
> > debian.
>
> Huh? I have not used stable Debian in
Noah L. Meyerhans writes:
> You know, you had merely to ask on the list about making your
> installation of debian less out-dated.
I believe he made it quite clear that he can't get past the Debian spam
filters.
> apt-get dist-upgrade
Over a 28.8 dialup? ROTFL.
> simply add deb http://www.us.d
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
You know, you had merely to ask on the list about making your installation
of debian less out-dated. We would have told you the following:
Add the following lines to /etc/apt/sources.list:
deb ftp://security.debian.org/debian-security stable updates
deb http://f
I have continued to use debian despite the fact that it has grown extremely out
date.
However failing to release a mini potato at this time, has forced me to drop
debian.
The debian mailing list spam check prevents me from sending mail from my home
machine. I am forced to shell into my email acc
On 20-Aug-99 Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
>
> There is none. Either it works or it does not. I am using it for now, I
> intend to use Mahogany as my mail client in the future. But I have to
> get a
> few Debian packages in a row for that to happen.
>
I have used Mahogany and have it installed,
On 19-Aug-99 Wim Kerkhoff wrote:
> I have been using xfmail for a while, but find it crashing often on me, ie,
> serveral times daily.
>
> It doesn't give any errors, though, besides the "Xfmail crashed... etc"
> dialog.
> What is the best way of reporting bugs?
>
There is none. Either it work
ppy.org/mailman/listinfo/xfmail.
On 20-Aug-99 Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
>
> On 20-Aug-99 Pollywog wrote:
>> It looks as though there is a new release of xfmail. Is that correct?
>
> I recompiled xfmail against gdbm and a few other clean-ups, closed all open
> bugs,
On 20-Aug-99 Pollywog wrote:
> It looks as though there is a new release of xfmail. Is that correct?
>
I recompiled xfmail against gdbm and a few other clean-ups, closed all open
bugs, etc. I have been unable to find the maint and upstream is also dead. I
am the maintainer now until s
It looks as though there is a new release of xfmail. Is that correct?
--
Andrew
George Bonser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: I think it was said that the new release will not be ready till sometime
: in late January or possibly later. Since they are going to a new libc, all
: packages have to be recompiled and some have a few bugs that have popped
: up with the new li
I've a simple question:
When will we have a new official release of Debian?
The 1.3.1 is a "little" old...
Thanks..
--
Sebastián Amigo Bascuñan.
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
website:http://purl.oclc.org/net/samigo
Por favor incluye una copia de este mensaje en tu
respuesta.
Un pingüino "univers
70 matches
Mail list logo
