>> > I had a couple, though it was on the last pre that called itself 2.2.0:
>> > a) it was not possible to change the irq for soundblaster to the value=20
>> > most cards use (5, and it defaults to 7? or is it vice versa).
>> You can pass parameters to modules when insmod'ing them,
>> ie insmod
On 26 Jan 1999 19:28:33 +0100, Jim McCloskey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
>I see that the 2.2.0 kernel is now officially released.
>
>Does anyone know if there are any problems, or things to be wary of, in
>compiling this kernel for Debian hamm?
>
After compiling and installing the kernel I can't
*- Bob Nielsen wrote about "Re: new kernel release"
> I've come across one problem in compiling, which did NOT occur with
> 2.2.0-pre9:
>
> drivers/sound/sound.a(sb_ess.o): In function `ess_init':
> sb_ess.o(.text+0xde2): undefined reference to `esstype&
I see that Documentation/CHANGES says that net-tools 1.49 is required. It
says to use 'hostname -V' to determine the version, but this does not
work. 'route -V' in both slink and potato that the net-tools version is
1.45. Is an upgrade needed here?
Bob
Bob Nielsen Internet
I've come across one problem in compiling, which did NOT occur with
2.2.0-pre9:
drivers/sound/sound.a(sb_ess.o): In function `ess_init':
sb_ess.o(.text+0xde2): undefined reference to `esstype'
sb_ess.o(.text+0xe77): undefined reference to `esstype'
make[1]: *** [vmlinux] Error 1
It compiled succe
Hi Jim,
> I see that the 2.2.0 kernel is now officially released.
>
> Does anyone know if there are any problems, or things to be wary of, in
> compiling this kernel for Debian hamm?
I compiled it today. But read Documentation/Changes first! I guess, you
need some packages from potato, e.g. newer
Yeah, it throws up an error with setserial that I have yet to get rid of...
Looking at the code, its just to say setserial -W is no longer
supported... However I changed that part of 0setserial and still
have the error. Anyway, it doesn't appear to be anything too serious.
Other than that, 2.2 wor
> > I had a couple, though it was on the last pre that called itself 2.2.0:
> > a) it was not possible to change the irq for soundblaster to the value=20
> > most cards use (5, and it defaults to 7? or is it vice versa).
> You can pass parameters to modules when insmod'ing them,
> ie insmod sb i
On Tue, Jan 26, 1999 at 01:19:25PM -0600, Richard E. Hawkins Esq. wrote:
> >
> > I see that the 2.2.0 kernel is now officially released.
> >
> > Does anyone know if there are any problems, or things to be wary of, in
> > compiling this kernel for Debian hamm?
>
> I had a couple, though it was o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Tue, 26 Jan 1999, Jim McCloskey wrote:
> I see that the 2.2.0 kernel is now officially released.
>
> Does anyone know if there are any problems, or things to be wary of, in
> compiling this kernel for Debian hamm?
Kernel 2.2.0 depends on certain package ve
>
> I see that the 2.2.0 kernel is now officially released.
>
> Does anyone know if there are any problems, or things to be wary of, in
> compiling this kernel for Debian hamm?
I had a couple, though it was on the last pre that called itself 2.2.0:
a) it was not possible to change the irq for
I see that the 2.2.0 kernel is now officially released.
Does anyone know if there are any problems, or things to be wary of, in
compiling this kernel for Debian hamm?
Thanks for your time,
Jim McCloskey
12 matches
Mail list logo
