On Sat, 28 Jan 2023 21:19:55 +0100
Sven Joachim wrote:
> Sorry, that was my fault. I should have given the link to outcome of
> the vote as well, it was Option 5 "Change SC for non-free firmware in
> installer, one installer"[1].
Thank you. My question is answered.
--
Does anybody read signat
On 2023-01-28 13:11 -0700, Charles Curley wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Jan 2023 19:05:39 +
> "Andrew M.A. Cater" wrote:
>
>> This all follows on the General Resolution a while ago.
>
> Right. I looked at the page to which Sven Joachim
> referred. https://www.debian.org/vote/2022/vote_003 Some of the
On Sat, 28 Jan 2023 19:05:39 +
"Andrew M.A. Cater" wrote:
> This all follows on the General Resolution a while ago.
Right. I looked at the page to which Sven Joachim
referred. https://www.debian.org/vote/2022/vote_003 Some of the
proposals explicitly required the installer to do so. However
On Sat, Jan 28, 2023 at 11:47:21AM -0700, Charles Curley wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Jan 2023 18:09:27 +0100
> Sven Joachim wrote:
>
> > To use the new section, edit sources.list like this:
> >
> > before:
> > deb http://deb.debian.org/debian/ unstable main contrib non-free
> >
> > after:
> > deb http:
On Sat, 28 Jan 2023 18:09:27 +0100
Sven Joachim wrote:
> To use the new section, edit sources.list like this:
>
> before:
> deb http://deb.debian.org/debian/ unstable main contrib non-free
>
> after:
> deb http://deb.debian.org/debian/ unstable main contrib non-free
> non-free-firmware
Will th
Some news for you who are running unstable or testing/bookworm and have
firmware packages installed from non-free (most users who do not run
Debian in a VM probably have): these firmware packages are being moved
to a new section non-free-firmware, and you should update your
sources.list(5) entries
6 matches
Mail list logo
