> I don't know what all this is about. Still, it woke me up.
I was just reading this in one of the TCP/IP books I have, so I'll take a stab
at explaining it (and let somebody else explain the
errors).
IP addresses are divided into "host" portions and "network" portions. The host
portion is assi
Always learning. Thanks, David.
-Mensagem original-
De: David Wright [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Enviada em: Quinta-feira, 15 de Fevereiro de 2001 11:55
Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; debian-user@lists.debian.org
Assunto: Re: RES: networking partly broken after upgrade to
Quoting Luiz Carlos S. de Alencar ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> The network mask assigned to eth0, as reported [255.255.252.0] by ifconfig,
> seems to be incorrect. Never heard about classless subnets in Class B
> networks. You probably have a Class C (/24) network [255.255.255.0] or a
> classless subnet
-Mensagem original-
De: Peter S Galbraith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Enviada em: Segunda-feira, 12 de Fevereiro de 2001 18:07
Para: Debian Users Mailing List
Cc: Peter S Galbraith
Assunto: networking partly broken after upgrade to testing
I have upgraded to testing and am now experiencing
I wrote:
> I have upgraded to testing and am now experiencing problems with
> networking (and I was expecting problems with XFree 4.0 and that
> part is fine :-)
>
> What works:
> - incoming mail (through fetchmail)
> - outgoing ftp
> - outgoing ssh
>
> What doesn't:
> - outgoing http connectio
I have upgraded to testing and am now experiencing problems with
networking (and I was expecting problems with XFree 4.0 and that
part is fine :-)
What works:
- incoming mail (through fetchmail)
- outgoing ftp
- outgoing ssh
What doesn't:
- outgoing http connections outside my gateway (just hang
6 matches
Mail list logo