On Tuesday 15 July 2014 19:21:05 Doug wrote:
> On 07/15/2014 10:46 AM, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> > On Tuesday 15 July 2014 00:45:25 Doug wrote:
> >> XSane
> >> is smart enough to take care of that
> >
> > No it's not, it needs the right drivers. Either you already happened to
> > have them, or your prin
On 07/15/2014 10:46 AM, Lisi Reisz wrote:
On Tuesday 15 July 2014 00:45:25 Doug wrote:
XSane
is smart enough to take care of that
No it's not, it needs the right drivers. Either you already happened to have
them, or your printer driver must have supplied Scanner drivers.
Lisi
I did not ha
Just a quick thank you to all who offered advice and help. The errant
Samsung hardware has started working again, so my search for a
replacement is deferred -- at least for now.
In case it helps anybody else, the things that brought the machine back
to life were rebooting the printer, clearing th
On Tuesday 15 July 2014 00:45:25 Doug wrote:
> XSane
> is smart enough to take care of that
No it's not, it needs the right drivers. Either you already happened to have
them, or your printer driver must have supplied Scanner drivers.
Lisi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists
On 14/07/14 03:04 PM, Richard Lyons wrote:
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 13:37:39 -0400, Doug wrote:
On 07/14/2014 10:45 AM, Steve Litt wrote:
I can't speak for Debian, but I am using an Epson WP-4530
multifunction. I have never had to load a driver for it in
PCLinuxOS-KDE or in Mint KDE, which uses
On 07/14/2014 03:04 PM, Richard Lyons wrote:
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 13:37:39 -0400, Doug wrote:
On 07/14/2014 10:45 AM, Steve Litt wrote:
I can't speak for Debian, but I am using an Epson WP-4530
multifunction. I have never had to load a driver for it in
PCLinuxOS-KDE or in Mint KDE, which us
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 13:37:39 -0400, Doug wrote:
>
> On 07/14/2014 10:45 AM, Steve Litt wrote:
> I can't speak for Debian, but I am using an Epson WP-4530
> multifunction. I have never had to load a driver for it in
> PCLinuxOS-KDE or in Mint KDE, which uses Ubuntu software.
I am tempted by t
On 07/14/2014 10:45 AM, Steve Litt wrote:
On Mon, 14 Jul 2014 14:13:22 +0100
Richard Lyons wrote:
Hi,
Perhaps someone here has already solved this:
I have wasted another 20 hours trying to get sane (or anything that
scans) to see a networked Samsung CLX-4195FN. And this is s journey I
have
On Monday 14 July 2014 14:13:22 Richard Lyons wrote:
> I have wasted another 20 hours trying to get sane (or anything that
> scans) to see a networked Samsung CLX-4195FN.
Have you spoken to the Samsung second line support Linux specialist(s)? Would
you like name and email address (off-list)? T
On Mon, 14 Jul 2014 15:58:56 +0100
Richard Lyons wrote:
> Yes, but in fact the printing side is usually manageable -- the main
> problem being that CUPS mysteriously finds more and more copies of the
> network printer, and it is difficult to know which one to choose when
> setting up a new prin
On 07/14/2014 10:58 AM, Richard Lyons wrote:
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 14:38:46 +0100, Brad Rogers wrote:
On Mon, 14 Jul 2014 14:13:22 +0100
Richard Lyons wrote:
Hello Richard,
I see that HP and OKI both claim to offer Linux drivers, for example.
With HP, by and large, you don't need to ins
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 10:45:57 -0400, Steve Litt wrote:
>
> If I'm reading your post correctly, you have no problem printing to
> this printer, only scanning. Perhaps you can do what I did...
>
> My Brother MFC8810DW multifunction is Linux compatable, and I even got
> the thing to scan from my
On Mon, 14 Jul 2014 15:58:56 +0100
Richard Lyons wrote:
Hello Richard,
>Yes, but in fact the printing side is usually manageable -- the main
>problem being that CUPS mysteriously finds more and more copies of the
I've not experienced that here, but my experience may be uncommon, IDK.
As you say
On Mon, 14 Jul 2014 14:13:22 +0100
Richard Lyons wrote:
apparently, it needs a special discover program to be
network discovered (read all, at least until P2):
http://www.bchemnet.com/suldr/forum/index.php?PHPSESSID=059e8faf009f3df74e6e30d8aa4f2d6e&action=recent;start=0
also take a look at the r
On Tue, 15 Jul 2014 01:18:43 +1200
Chris Bannister wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 02:13:22PM +0100, Richard Lyons wrote:
> > I see that HP and OKI both claim to offer Linux drivers, for
> > example. The sane-project.org website never has the current models,
> > however, so I would like to hear
On Mon, 14 Jul 2014 14:13:22 +0100
Richard Lyons wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Perhaps someone here has already solved this:
>
> I have wasted another 20 hours trying to get sane (or anything that
> scans) to see a networked Samsung CLX-4195FN. And this is s journey I
> have travelled before with a B+W Brot
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 14:38:46 +0100, Brad Rogers wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Jul 2014 14:13:22 +0100
> Richard Lyons wrote:
>
> Hello Richard,
>
> >I see that HP and OKI both claim to offer Linux drivers, for example.
>
> With HP, by and large, you don't need to install their own drivers.
> Here, I
On Mon, 14 Jul 2014 14:13:22 +0100
Richard Lyons wrote:
> I see that HP and OKI both claim to offer Linux drivers, for
> example. The sane-project.org website never has the current
> models, however, so I would like to hear any positive experience
> others have had before buying another expensive
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 01:18:43 +1200, Chris Bannister wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 02:13:22PM +0100, Richard Lyons wrote:
> > I see that HP and OKI both claim to offer Linux drivers, for example.
> > The sane-project.org website never has the current models, however, so I
> > would like to h
On Mon, 14 Jul 2014 14:13:22 +0100
Richard Lyons wrote:
Hello Richard,
>I see that HP and OKI both claim to offer Linux drivers, for example.
With HP, by and large, you don't need to install their own drivers.
Here, I install hplip and drivers (from the repos).
>The sane-project.org website ne
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 02:13:22PM +0100, Richard Lyons wrote:
> I see that HP and OKI both claim to offer Linux drivers, for example.
> The sane-project.org website never has the current models, however, so I
> would like to hear any positive experience others have had before buying
> another expe
Hi,
Perhaps someone here has already solved this:
I have wasted another 20 hours trying to get sane (or anything that
scans) to see a networked Samsung CLX-4195FN. And this is s journey I
have travelled before with a B+W Brother MFP which ran for a few years
under various flavours of Debian with
22 matches
Mail list logo
