On Fri, 13 Jan 2012 14:07:48 -0600, Selim T. Erdogan wrote:
> It probably isn't this simple but have you tried running the following?
>
> ifup eth0
Thanks for your suggestion!
I've just tried it.
With the static interface configuration it sets the IP address but I
can't ping anything in the
It probably isn't this simple but have you tried running the following?
ifup eth0
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120113200748.ga5...@cs.utexas.edu
On Thu, 12 Jan 2012 11:46:17 +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Mi, 11 ian 12, 23:56:56, Ramon Hofer wrote:
>>
>> Unfortunately there are no leds on the Shuttle. When I first noticed
>> the problem the link leds on the switch weren't on.
>
> Is that led still off?
Yes, the leds are still off.
On Mi, 11 ian 12, 23:56:56, Ramon Hofer wrote:
>
> Unfortunately there are no leds on the Shuttle.
> When I first noticed the problem the link leds on the switch weren't on.
Is that led still off?
> Then I tried a different cable on a different port.
> Afterwards I installed Win 7. After install
On Wed, 11 Jan 2012 23:30:56 +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Mi, 11 ian 12, 19:31:18, Ramon Hofer wrote:
>> >
>> > dmesg http://pastebin.com/sBtbX2T7
>
> What I'm missing in your dmesg is a "Link is Up..." notice.
>
> Please make sure you have the correct ethernet cable and the link led is
>
On Mi, 11 ian 12, 19:31:18, Ramon Hofer wrote:
> >
> > dmesg http://pastebin.com/sBtbX2T7
What I'm missing in your dmesg is a "Link is Up..." notice.
Please make sure you have the correct ethernet cable and the link led is
on. You might also want to test with a known good cable and check the
l
On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 23:09:21 +, Ramon Hofer wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Jan 2012 00:01:16 +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote:
>
>> On Ma, 10 ian 12, 16:22:10, Ramon Hofer wrote:
>>>
>>> You wrote in your first answer I should update to the newest kernel.
>>> At the moment is 2.6.32-5-amd64 installed. How c
On Wed, 11 Jan 2012 00:01:16 +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Ma, 10 ian 12, 16:22:10, Ramon Hofer wrote:
>>
>> You wrote in your first answer I should update to the newest kernel. At
>> the moment is 2.6.32-5-amd64 installed. How can I do that without a
>> network connection?
>
> USB sticks ca
On Ma, 10 ian 12, 16:22:10, Ramon Hofer wrote:
>
> You wrote in your first answer I should update to the newest kernel. At
> the moment is 2.6.32-5-amd64 installed.
> How can I do that without a network connection?
USB sticks can be very handy in such cases. It would also be useful if
you could
On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 00:34:29 +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Lu, 09 ian 12, 16:07:38, Ramon Hofer wrote:
>>
>> I can skip the network setup of netinst. But I can't skip the part when
>> I have to choose a Debian mirror?
>
> It should be possible. Worst case the "Back" button should get you to
On Lu, 09 ian 12, 16:07:38, Ramon Hofer wrote:
>
> I can skip the network setup of netinst. But I can't skip the part when I
> have to choose a Debian mirror?
It should be possible. Worst case the "Back" button should get you to a
menu where you can just choose the next step ;)
> After the in
Thanks alot for you answer Andrei!
On Mon, 09 Jan 2012 10:07:28 +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Du, 08 ian 12, 17:18:57, Ramon Hofer wrote:
>> Hi all
>>
>> I used a Shuttle XS35GTV2 as XBMC frontend with OpenELEC. Since some
>> time it lost its Network connection (I use ethernet not WLAN). I
On Du, 08 ian 12, 17:18:57, Ramon Hofer wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I used a Shuttle XS35GTV2 as XBMC frontend with OpenELEC. Since some time
> it lost its Network connection (I use ethernet not WLAN). I have no clue
> why this happend. I suggest it was due to the OpenELEC update 1.02.
...
> Can you he
Hi all
I used a Shuttle XS35GTV2 as XBMC frontend with OpenELEC. Since some time
it lost its Network connection (I use ethernet not WLAN). I have no clue
why this happend. I suggest it was due to the OpenELEC update 1.02.
Since I'd like to use XBMC as MythTV frontend too I want to install
Deb
I put a working PCI network card from my computer that also runs Debian
Testing (Etch) into this computer and installed from a Debian Testing
netinstall CD that has a 2.6.12 kernel. Again, Debian didn't detect the
built-in network port.
--
/dmesg | grep eth/
eth0: Re
Debian Etch (Testing) does not detect the built-in ethernet port, so I
can not connect to the router or the internet.
--
/uname -a/
Linux farabi 2.6.12-1-386 #1 Tue Sep 27 12:41:08 JST 2005 i686 GNU/Linux
--
//etc/network/interfaces/
# This
Debian Sarge (Stable) does not detect the built-in ethernet port, so I
can not connect to the router or the internet.
--
uname -a
Linux farabi 2.6.8-2-686 #1 Thu May 19 17:53:30 JST 2005 i686 GNU/Linux
--
/etc/resolve.conf
search lan
nameser
Knoppix 4.0 Live DVD works fine and automatically detects and configures
the built-in ethernet port which I can use to connect to the router and
the internet without a problem.
/--
/uname -a/
Linux Knoppix 2.6.12 #2 SMP Tue Aug 9 23:20:52 CEST 2005 i686 GNU/Linux
/uname -a/
Linux farabi 2.6.8-2-686 #1 Thu May 19 17:53:30 JST 2005 i686 GNU/Linux
--
//etc/resolve.conf/
search lan
nameserver 10.0.0.138
--
//etc/network/interfaces/
# This file describes the network interfaces available on your system
# an
I am trying to install debian on my wife's computer. It already has
Windows XP installed and running on the first partition and used to have
Mandrake 10 on another partition. Both Windows XP and Mandrake 10
recognized all hardware components including the built in network chipset.
I tried differ
I am trying to install debian on my wife's computer. It already has
Windows XP installed and running on the first partition and used to have
Mandrake 10 on another partition. Both Windows XP and Mandrake 10
recognized all hardware components including the built in network chipset.
I tried differ
I am trying to install debian on my wife's computer. It already has
Windows XP installed and running on the first partition and used to have
Mandrake 10 on another partition. Both Windows XP and Mandrake 10
recognized all hardware components including the built in network chipset.
I tried differ
hi
i just installed unstable on a machine. everything seems fine other than
the fact that i cant access http or ping any hosts other than my router.
is this perhaps because i have a http proxy installed?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Co
I'm running Debian w/ kernel 2.4.18 and real-time Linux v. 3.1. The kernel compiles without problems, but on two completely different computers, the network does not function properly.
Within the pix firewall at our location, only ssh works into and out of the computers (ping works also, and res
On 21-Nov-2001 Randolph S. Kahle wrote:
>
> I have installed Debian on at least a dozen systems now (I guess I'm not
> a total newbie now...)
>
> Anyway -- this is the first time I have had a system with a 905c 3Com
> card not be able to get out on the network. (All but one of my systems
> us 90
I have installed Debian on at least a dozen systems now (I guess I'm not
a total newbie now...)
Anyway -- this is the first time I have had a system with a 905c 3Com
card not be able to get out on the network. (All but one of my systems
us 905x cards)...
System sets up fine, ifconfig reports cor
Peter Ludwig:
> error connecting to 192.168.0.11:139 (No route to host)
What does route tell you?
That's "/sbin/route" from the netbase package.
Jiri
--
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
We'll know the future has arrived when every mailer transparently
quotes lines that begin with "From ", but no-one rememb
Peter Ludwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Umm... why? What IS the /etc/lmhosts file? And if samba wants it, why is
> it not referred to in the Samba Documentation (the only thing I haven't
> done is grep the files to find it, perhaps I should...)?
$ man lmhosts
Reformatting lmhosts(5), please
"Roland E. Lipovits" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Feb 11, 1999 at 12:36:14AM +1300, Carey Evans wrote:
> > Trying to use 192.168.0.xxx is asking for trouble, in my opinion. Try
>
> Why?
Oops. Because:
1. It was after midnight the first day back at work, and I really
shouldn't post i
On 11 Feb 1999, Carey Evans wrote:
> Peter Ludwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > This is the response I get from SMBCLIENT :
> > Added interface ip=192.168.0.1 bcast=192.168.0.255 nmask=255.255.255.0
> > startlmhosts: Can't open lmhosts file /etc/lmhosts. Error was No such file
> > or directory
>
On 10-Feb-99 Carey Evans wrote:
>
> Trying to use 192.168.0.xxx is asking for trouble, in my opinion.
Why? I've been using this series for years on a home Linux LAN with no
problems at all that I'm aware of.
> Try setting Linux and Windows to 192.168.1..
What difference does it make to change f
On Thu, Feb 11, 1999 at 12:36:14AM +1300, Carey Evans wrote:
> Trying to use 192.168.0.xxx is asking for trouble, in my opinion. Try
Why?
Regards,
Lipo
--
Roland E. Lipovits
Vienna, Austria
Peter Ludwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I installed Debian telling it that I was on a network (the home network,
> two machines, nothing fancy), and yet I seem to be unable to talk to the
> other machine.
>
> This is the response I get from SMBCLIENT :
> Added interface ip=192.168.0.1 bcast=19
I'm having fun here :)
I've got the system setup to handle my ISP almost perfectly (still am
having a problem with fetchmail not responding to all requests properly),
now I've got a problem with the network at home.
I installed Debian telling it that I was on a network (the home network,
two mach
34 matches
Mail list logo
