hat's up.
Zenaan idea of perpetuating this (useful but ugly) hack in e/n/i
seemed... well, nasty. But funny :-)
> I've been using it precisely because the early
> versions of network mangler could not be removed without emasculating
> the whole system, AND it couldn't find
> you nasty ;-)
>
> cheers
> -- t
Why do you say that Tomas? I've been using it precisely because the early
versions of network mangler could not be removed without emasculating
the whole system, AND it couldn't find a dhcpd server with both hands
even if it was nailed to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, Aug 05, 2017 at 12:11:28AM +1000, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 04, 2017 at 10:14:20AM +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
[chattr]
> Another command that could be add to /e/n/i :)
you nasty ;-)
cheers
- -- t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
On Fri, Aug 04, 2017 at 09:01:32AM +0100, Joe wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Aug 2017 10:59:13 +1000
> Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> > Given the uniqueness of how you seem to want to do your networking,
> > perhaps that's the best option to make it less abnormal - looks like
> > it to me.
>
> I don't think it's r
On Fri, Aug 04, 2017 at 10:14:20AM +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 08:49:05PM +0200, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
> > Le 03/08/2017 à 15:52, Zenaan Harkness a écrit :
> > >On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 08:53:27AM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > >>But the problem is, various Unix DHCP c
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 08:49:05PM +0200, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
> Le 03/08/2017 à 15:52, Zenaan Harkness a écrit :
> >On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 08:53:27AM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> >>But the problem is, various Unix DHCP client daemons do *too much*
On Fri, 4 Aug 2017 10:59:13 +1000
Zenaan Harkness wrote:
>
> Given the uniqueness of how you seem to want to do your networking,
> perhaps that's the best option to make it less abnormal - looks like
> it to me.
>
I don't think it's really all that unique, or unreasonable, for a
computer user
On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 08:49:05PM +0200, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
> Le 03/08/2017 à 15:52, Zenaan Harkness a écrit :
> > On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 08:53:27AM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > > But the problem is, various Unix DHCP client daemons do *too much*.
> > > All I want them to do is set the IP
On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 08:53:06PM +0200, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
> Le 03/08/2017 à 17:20, Joshua Schaeffer a écrit :
> >
> > Configuration in /etc/network/interfaces only works when NetworkManager
> > isn't installed,
>
> Wrong. The default NetworkManager behaviour is not to manage interfaces
>
Le 03/08/2017 à 17:20, Joshua Schaeffer a écrit :
Configuration in /etc/network/interfaces only works when NetworkManager isn't
installed,
Wrong. The default NetworkManager behaviour is not to manage interfaces
defined in /etc/network/interfaces.
Le 03/08/2017 à 15:52, Zenaan Harkness a écrit :
On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 08:53:27AM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
But the problem is, various Unix DHCP client daemons do *too much*.
All I want them to do is set the IP address, netmask, and gateway.
I *don't* want them to change the system hostname
On 08/02/2017 06:56 PM, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
>
> I've preferred a static networking config for years, and resolvconf
> works well in this situation - but once resolvconf is configured,
> I've always put the dns setting in /etc/networks/interfaces
I agree with this as well. If you want to use st
funky things that happen with DHCP. I keep master copies of the true
> /etc/resolv.conf and /etc/hosts files (plus one other HP-UX-specific
> network config file), which all get overwritten by the DHCP client,
> and I restore them at just the right time.
That sounds ugly, and way overly hacky.
with DHCP. I keep master copies of the true
/etc/resolv.conf and /etc/hosts files (plus one other HP-UX-specific
network config file), which all get overwritten by the DHCP client,
and I restore them at just the right time. I put the hostname and IP
in /etc/hosts so that dtlogin can start. Also,
On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 02:55:50PM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 08:10:23PM +0200, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
> > Le 02/08/2017 à 16:19, Greg Wooledge a écrit :
> > >
> > > 1) Make sure the Debian "resolvconf" package is *not* installed.
> >
> > You should reconsider this advi
On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 05:44:50PM +0400, ruslan axundov wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have a problem with debian 9 as static nameserver .
> So that I used before ubuntu 16.04 and I have configure satatic ip and dns
> and it worked perfectly but today I tried to use debian 9 and when I
> enter static dns s
On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 08:10:23PM +0200, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
> Le 02/08/2017 à 16:19, Greg Wooledge a écrit :
> >
> > 1) Make sure the Debian "resolvconf" package is *not* installed.
>
> You should reconsider this advice. resolvconf may be your best ally to
> handle such a situation.
OK, I'v
Le 02/08/2017 à 16:19, Greg Wooledge a écrit :
1) Make sure the Debian "resolvconf" package is *not* installed.
You should reconsider this advice. resolvconf may be your best ally to
handle such a situation.
3) I have utterly no idea how Network-Manager works
Me neither, but I know one t
On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 05:44:50PM +0400, ruslan axundov wrote:
> I tried to use debian 9 and when I
> enter static dns server for debian in resolve.conf then after reboot
> debian all dns ip removed from resolv.conf file. I tried multiple method to
> prevent this feature but nothing happen. what
Hi
I have a problem with debian 9 as static nameserver .
So that I used before ubuntu 16.04 and I have configure satatic ip and dns
and it worked perfectly but today I tried to use debian 9 and when I
enter static dns server for debian in resolve.conf then after reboot
debian all dns ip remove
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 10:47:15AM -0500, Paul Cartwright wrote:
> On Fri February 15 2008, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> > > > link-local 169.254.0.0
> > >
> > >
> > > what is this ^^^
> >
> > Per google and wikipedia.
> >
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Link-local_address
> >
> > Quite normal th
On Fri February 15 2008, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> > > link-local 169.254.0.0
> >
> >
> > what is this ^^^
>
> Per google and wikipedia.
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Link-local_address
>
> Quite normal though.
>
> I have not read the context but this is FYI.
ok, this seems to tell me when
On Sun, Apr 30, 2006 at 08:42:34AM -0700, belahcene abdelkader wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> i am using sarge, I want to create a boot disk from
> my distro, I tried mkboot, but it seems running with
> lilo and not grub
>
> network: there is no network configuring program, like
> netcardconfig, So I have
Hi,
i am using sarge, I want to create a boot disk from
my distro, I tried mkboot, but it seems running with
lilo and not grub
network: there is no network configuring program, like
netcardconfig, So I have to fill manually the
/etc/network/interface file
The configuration of printer seems dif
Thanks to all for your info and pointers!
VS
s. keeling wrote:
RMS seems to have disagreements with just about everyone but himself.
RMS more than any public figure I know of, seems to generate these ad
hominem attacks against himself. He's also the most intelligent and
relentlessly logical writer and speaker of any public figure I know
vineyard saker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 1) during my install I was not connected to the Internet (I had
> ordered the 14 Debian CDs from budgetlinuxcds) and I therefore did not
> configure my network card. Now I would like to connect my computer to
> the rest of my computers on a home networ
Hi,
vineyard saker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
>
> I just completed a switch from 5 years of Mandrake to Debian
> GNU/Linux. The install went well, although I had to use a couple of
> tricks to configure X and my soundcard. I now have to basic
> questions:
>
> 1) during my install I was not conn
Depends what kind of networking you want to do. If you are just
connecting to a LAN with a DHCP server running, then just run
"/etc/init.d/networking start" as root and see if it works. If you
want a static IP address and name servers, the easiest way is probably
to use the Gnome network tools - av
Hi everybody,
I just completed a switch from 5 years of Mandrake to Debian
GNU/Linux. The install went well, although I had to use a couple of
tricks to configure X and my soundcard. I now have to basic
questions:
1) during my install I was not connected to the Internet (I had
ordered the 14 De
john gennard wrote:
How do I run network configuration in Sarge. I ignored it in
a recent install?
Would someone please let me know.
John.
Probably the easiest way is to do "apt-get install etherconf", which
will give you a nice interface to network configuration. If you need to
change anything
john gennard wrote:
How do I run network configuration in Sarge. I ignored it in
a recent install?
Would someone please let me know.
I edit /etc/network/interfaces with vim. I expect that vigor might do as
well.
for more,
man interfaces
etc.
--
Cheers
John
-- spambait
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PR
How do I run network configuration in Sarge. I ignored it in
a recent install?
Would someone please let me know.
John.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sunday 15 February 2004 01:28, Paul Johnson wrote:
> Ah. OK. Is all this listed someplace and I somehow overlooked it?
F10;help; user manual - scroll down to the section on searching
--
Alan Chandler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "un
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, Feb 15, 2004 at 01:21:53AM +, Alan Chandler wrote:
> On Sunday 15 February 2004 00:14, Paul Johnson wrote:
>
> >
> > That only finds package names, doesn't bother searching descriptions.
> >
> /~d
>
> will find the next package with "
On Sunday 15 February 2004 00:14, Paul Johnson wrote:
>
> That only finds package names, doesn't bother searching descriptions.
>
/~d
will find the next package with "" in the description
\ will move to the next occurance
--
Alan Chandler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, Feb 14, 2004 at 11:35:16PM +, Alan Chandler wrote:
> not sure what you mean since I don't use apt-cache
>
> You can search for packages by typing
> / followed by the initial characters of the package name - it searches as you
> type. The
On Saturday 14 February 2004 21:31, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On the other hand, there doesn't seem to be a good way to do an
> apt-cache search from within aptitude.
not sure what you mean since I don't use apt-cache
You can search for packages by typing
/ followed by the initial characters of the
On Sat, 14 Feb 2004 13:28:50 -0800
Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 13, 2004 at 08:46:10PM -0600, Jacob S. wrote:
> > Apt-get by itself is years beyond what rpm was, when I played around
> > with it.
>
> Well, that's comparing an apple to an orange, as well. apt-get would
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, Feb 14, 2004 at 02:33:32PM +, Alan Chandler wrote:
> I used to use dselect quite a lot to search for packages - that was
> until I found aptitude. Now I would live without it - the advantage
> over the command line tools is that you can br
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Feb 13, 2004 at 08:46:10PM -0600, Jacob S. wrote:
> Apt-get by itself is years beyond what rpm was, when I played around
> with it.
Well, that's comparing an apple to an orange, as well. apt-get would
be closest to the cheap knockoff, apt-rpm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Feb 13, 2004 at 08:12:28PM -0600, Jacob S. wrote:
> Enjoy your new Debian machine! Oh, and if you have a decent 'net
> connection, use apt-get from your nearest mirror to download the extra
> packages you want... much easier than downloading/bu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 09:25:17PM -0500, Marty Landman wrote:
> I've just installed Woody from the mini-iso on a PI-166/32M ram/6GB ide
> with a netgear FS310TX nic installed. The light from the cable on my lan
> switch is lit but I couldn't find th
On Saturday 14 February 2004 02:46, Jacob S. wrote:
...
> If you want something to hold your hand a little
> more than apt-get, try aptitude (or so I'm told... I learned apt-get and
> never felt like changing. Apt-get by itself is years beyond what rpm
> was, when I played around with it.) There's
On Fri, 13 Feb 2004 21:32:12 -0500
Marty Landman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 09:12 PM 2/13/2004, Jacob S. wrote:
>
> >I thought for sure you had said it was a Netgear card...
>
> 'Tis... fa310tx to be exact. Apparently it works with the tulip driver
> just fine, got 'top' running on an ssh s
At 09:12 PM 2/13/2004, Jacob S. wrote:
I thought for sure you had said it was a Netgear card...
'Tis... fa310tx to be exact. Apparently it works with the tulip driver just
fine, got 'top' running on an ssh session as I write this -- watching my
new debian box do essentially nothing at the moment
On Fri, 13 Feb 2004 18:10:14 -0500
Marty Landman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 10:44 PM 2/12/2004, Jacob S. wrote:
>
> >Older 3coms are probably the easiest to recognize and install, of all
> >the network cards I've known.
>
> Ironic; with MS products I'm finding just the opposite i.e. older
>
At 06:10 PM 2/13/2004, Marty Landman wrote:
What else do you recommend and where can I d/l it from?
Nevermind, I found the doc page :)
Will post back with any details I can't figure out.
Marty Landman Face 2 Interface Inc 845-679-9387
This Month's New Quiz --- Past Superbowl Winners
Make a Web
At 10:44 PM 2/12/2004, Jacob S. wrote:
Older 3coms are probably the easiest to recognize and install, of all the
network cards I've known.
Ironic; with MS products I'm finding just the opposite i.e. older stuff is
deprecated. This very same nic model is installed on my wife's w98
workstation an
On Thu, 12 Feb 2004 22:16:22 -0500
Marty Landman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 09:46 PM 2/12/2004, Jacob S. wrote:
>
> >First, check to make sure you have the kernel module for your NIC
> >installed. "lsmod" will show you all the kernel modules currently
> >loaded.
>
> lockd / sunrpc / nls_cp
At 09:46 PM 2/12/2004, Jacob S. wrote:
First, check to make sure you have the kernel module for your NIC
installed. "lsmod" will show you all the kernel modules currently loaded.
lockd / sunrpc / nls_cp437 / pcmcia_core / af_packet / unix
You might also check "dmesg" for any output concerning yo
On Thu, 12 Feb 2004 21:25:17 -0500
Marty Landman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've just installed Woody from the mini-iso on a PI-166/32M ram/6GB
> ide with a netgear FS310TX nic installed. The light from the cable on
> my lan switch is lit but I couldn't find the nic on the config list,
> and att
I've just installed Woody from the mini-iso on a PI-166/32M ram/6GB ide
with a netgear FS310TX nic installed. The light from the cable on my lan
switch is lit but I couldn't find the nic on the config list, and attempting
ifconfig eth0 192.168.0.3 netmask 255.255.255.0 up
fails with 'no such de
Alberto Tobias wrote:
/etc/network/interfaces
or, alternatively you can install etherconf.
'apt-get install etherconf'
this will lead you through a prompted setup.
Matt
Thanks for the tip!
However, it does noet appear to solve my issue. After reboot I still need to
manually bring up th
- Original Message -
From: "Joyce, Matthew" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Alberto Tobias'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Debian-User"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 10:36 PM
Subject: RE: Debian Newbie Question on Networ
"Alberto Tobias" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 1. (*) text/plain ( ) text/html
ObFormatting: please set your mailer to send plain text only, and wrap
lines at 72 characters.
> I have however one question. I have troubles with my network card. I
> can get it up and running ok
PROTECTED]
Subject: Debian Newbie Question on Network Config
Hi,
I relatively new to LInux. The last couple of months I have been dabbling
with some distributions, but right now I am staying with Debian.
I have however one question. I have troubles with my network card. I can get
it up and running
Hi,
I relatively new to LInux. The last couple of
months I have been dabbling with some distributions, but right now I am staying
with Debian.
I have however one question. I have troubles with
my network card. I can get it up and running ok, using the tulip drivers from
scyld.org. I can
On Thu, 2003-06-05 at 08:20, steve downes wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-06-04 at 23:35, Frank Gevaerts wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 11:10:37PM +0100, steve downes wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2003-06-04 at 15:40, Kevin McKinley wrote:
> > > > On 04 Jun 2003 14:30:50 +0100
> > > > steve downes <[EMAIL PROTECT
On Wed, 2003-06-04 at 23:35, Frank Gevaerts wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 11:10:37PM +0100, steve downes wrote:
> > On Wed, 2003-06-04 at 15:40, Kevin McKinley wrote:
> > > On 04 Jun 2003 14:30:50 +0100
> > > steve downes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Anyone know how to get the kerne
On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 11:10:37PM +0100, steve downes wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-06-04 at 15:40, Kevin McKinley wrote:
> > On 04 Jun 2003 14:30:50 +0100
> > steve downes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Anyone know how to get the kernel to see the right irq & io for a 3c509b
> > > card with the ab
On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 11:10:37PM +0100, steve downes wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-06-04 at 15:40, Kevin McKinley wrote:
> > On 04 Jun 2003 14:30:50 +0100
> > steve downes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Anyone know how to get the kernel to see the right irq & io for a 3c509b
> > > card with the ab
On Wed, 2003-06-04 at 15:40, Kevin McKinley wrote:
> On 04 Jun 2003 14:30:50 +0100
> steve downes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Anyone know how to get the kernel to see the right irq & io for a 3c509b
> > card with the above kernel. Windows, 2.2 kernel & ltsp all get it right
> > 2.4 gets somet
On 04 Jun 2003 14:30:50 +0100
steve downes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anyone know how to get the kernel to see the right irq & io for a 3c509b
> card with the above kernel. Windows, 2.2 kernel & ltsp all get it right
> 2.4 gets something completely different
>
> Steve
You can specify the IRQ a
Anyone know how to get the kernel to see the right irq & io for a 3c509b
card with the above kernel. Windows, 2.2 kernel & ltsp all get it right
2.4 gets something completely different
Steve
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
On Wed, 5 Mar 2003 at 9:00pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:Setting up the loopback and pingin it works fine, pinging into the
:machine also works fine (tried from an old win95 machine). But
:pinging out of the machine dosn't work, I'm getting the error message
:"Unable to connect to remote host: N
Barry deFreese
NTS Technology Services Manager
Nike Team Sports
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 1:16 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Network config help needed
>
>
>
> Yep,
Yep, read Net-HOWTO, but still I can't get it to work. ...
Setting up the loopback and pingin it works fine, pinging into the
machine also works fine (tried from an old win95 machine). But
pinging out of the machine dosn't work, I'm getting the error message
"Unable to connect to remote host:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please help me
I'm trying to connect two pc's, but I allways get the message
"unable to connect to remote host: No route to host". What am I
missing?
My config for pc1 looks like this:
ifconfig eth0 192.168.0.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 up
rout add -host 192.168.0.2 eth0
"
Am Son, 2003-03-02 um 13.15 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Please help me
> I'm trying to connect two pc's, but I allways get the message
> "unable to connect to remote host: No route to host". What am I
> missing?
>
> My config for pc1 looks like this:
> ifconfig eth0 192.168.0.1 netmask 255.255
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
you dont have a lo in ur route: loopback interface.
check whether you can ping to yourself (lo) 127.0.0.1 on each pc.
then configure pc1 as 192.168.0.1. repeat the two steps with pc2,
only changing the ip address.
the initial sections of Net-HOWTO must help.
so
Please help me
I'm trying to connect two pc's, but I allways get the message
"unable to connect to remote host: No route to host". What am I
missing?
My config for pc1 looks like this:
ifconfig eth0 192.168.0.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 up
rout add -host 192.168.0.2 eth0
"route -n" output:
192.1
Hi,
I am setting up box pigeon as an NFS server from which to install
woody on box nestie via ethernet. I am attempting to make
/scsidrive/woody[1..7] available for export. Box nestie isn't up at
all yet, so I'm trying to test it by mounting the exported filesystem
locally.
I intend for pigeon to
Panuganty, Ramesh wrote:
> What files did you change?
>
> /etc/network/interfaces or
> /etc/pcmcia/network.opts
>
> Also look at your /etc/modules
Thanks very much to Ramesh, Troy and others responding. I changed
/etc/netowrk/interfaces but /etc/pcmcia/network.opts still has the old
informatio
Yang Shouxun, 2002-Mar-19 13:48 +0800:
> Dear Debian Users,
>
> I'm using Debian GNU/Linux unstable. Recently I move to a new place and
> the ethernet configuration changed as a result. I manually edited all
> the files.
>
> It works fine except that each time when pcmcia service starts, the IP
Dear Debian Users,
I'm using Debian GNU/Linux unstable. Recently I move to a new place and
the ethernet configuration changed as a result. I manually edited all
the files.
It works fine except that each time when pcmcia service starts, the IP
address, network mask and other things are of the
On Wed, 2002-02-27 at 08:38, debianlist wrote:
> In win2k, I am using DHCP to connect internet. In Debian,can I use the
> information(ip,DNS Server..) get from in win2k to manual config network in
> Debian?
Assuming you have your DHCP server configured properly, Debian can get
the same info
;t work, let me know.
Cheers,
Stephan
- Original Message -
From: debianlist
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 3:38 PM
Subject: about network config
>HI:
> In win2k, I am using DHCP to connect internet. In Debian,can I use the
information
>(ip,D
HI:
In win2k, I am using DHCP to connect
internet. In Debian,can I use the information(ip,DNS Server..) get from in win2k
to manual config network in Debian?
Thanks
On Monday 10 December 2001 19:39, Mark Ferlatte wrote:
> > Reading again /etc/init.d/dhcp I see the following:
> >
> > # Add all interfaces you want dhcpd to handle here
>
> Change the lines in /etc/init.d/dhcp that look like
>
> start-stop-daemon --start --quiet --pidfile $DHCPDPID
On Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 05:46:56PM -0300, Daniel Toffetti wrote (1.00):
> Reading again /etc/init.d/dhcp I see the following:
>
> # Add all interfaces you want dhcpd to handle here
Change the lines in /etc/init.d/dhcp that look like
start-stop-daemon --start --quiet --pidfile $DH
On Monday 10 December 2001 16:23, Daniel Toffetti wrote:
> But now (and this is why I say PART-SOLVED) the internal hosts are
> not assigned a valid internal IP from the proxy via pump. I even
> copied the file dhcpd.conf from my old proxy to the new, tried
> changing from pump to dhcpcd in the int
On Sunday 09 December 2001 16:24, Michael Heldebrant wrote:
> > It's strange to me that 'pump -i eth1 --status' shows correctly the
> > gateway (10.7.2.1), nameservers, etc. So I tried to add the two
> > missing entries, and it failed.
> >
> > root:> route add default gw 10.7.2.1 dev eth1
> > SIOCA
On Sun, 2001-12-09 at 12:50, Daniel Toffetti wrote:
> On Sunday 09 December 2001 02:53, Michael Heldebrant wrote:
> > You want:
> > auto ethWHATEVER
> > iface inet dhcp ethWHATEVER
> > instead of "static dhcp" which, I'm not even sure how it would be
> > parsed by ifup. ifconfig should tell you if
On Sunday 09 December 2001 02:53, Michael Heldebrant wrote:
> You want:
> auto ethWHATEVER
> iface inet dhcp ethWHATEVER
> instead of "static dhcp" which, I'm not even sure how it would be
> parsed by ifup. ifconfig should tell you if your interface iseven
> being brought up.
My fault here, sorry
On Sat, 2001-12-08 at 23:14, Daniel Toffetti wrote:
> On Saturday 08 December 2001 16:58, ben wrote:
> > > Right now I get the external interface be assigned the valid IP
> > > address as before, configuring it as 'static dhcp - hostname pump'
> > > in /etc/interfaces. But when I try _any_ ping (an
On Saturday 08 December 2001 16:58, ben wrote:
> > Right now I get the external interface be assigned the valid IP
> > address as before, configuring it as 'static dhcp - hostname pump'
> > in /etc/interfaces. But when I try _any_ ping (any but my own
> > address and localhost, of course), it fails
On Saturday 08 December 2001 10:41 am, Daniel Toffetti wrote:
> Hi all !
>
> I've a small diskless proxy booting from a floppy based distro called
> Coyote. Now I've got an old HDD and I'm installing Debian Potato, but
> I'm failing to get the access to the Net working.
> Right now I get the extern
Hi all !
I've a small diskless proxy booting from a floppy based distro called
Coyote. Now I've got an old HDD and I'm installing Debian Potato, but
I'm failing to get the access to the Net working.
Right now I get the external interface be assigned the valid IP address
as before, configuring i
On Tuesday 30 Oct 2001 7:20 pm, D. wrote:
> you need to answer is what is your Hostname? Then it
> will ask you if you want the program to set up your
> network automatically, saying yes will do this and if
> the program is successful it will say congratulations
> your network is set up.
> What
If memory serves me correctly, during the installation
of Potato at the point of inserting/selecting modules,
if your nic card is on the list and you select it,
when you exit that portation of the install it will
ask you if you want to configure your network. Saying
yes will start the process and
www.webmin.com/webmin
On Tuesday 30 October 2001 08:50 am, Will Newton wrote:
> Is there such a thing?
Is there such a thing?
Specifically a tool to edit /etc/network/interfaces. And before you say,
"yes, vim", I know it isn't that hard, but some people do find this
difficult, and when I say "Debian is great, install Debian" I would like to
be able to point them in the direction of simple tools
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far way, someone said...
> Hi all, I'm just curious. why are there so many files that apparently
> hold the same information? I thought the network configuration were
> kept in files hosts, hostname, gateways, route.s
--- Terry Boon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> /etc/network/interfaces is where you may want
> to look. Here's mine as
> an example (with one ethernet card):
>
># /etc/network/interfaces -- configuration
> file for ifup(8), ifdown(8)
>
># The loopback interface
>iface lo inet loopback
Thank you!
Robin
- Original Message -
From: "Terry Boon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, December 25, 2000 2:58 PM
Subject: Re: Network config easy question
> On Mon, Dec 25, 2000 at 02:27:53PM -0800, Robin Rowe wrote:
> > Dumb question, how do I se
:-> "Pierfrancesco" == Pierfrancesco Caci <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> the dns host is set up using /proc directly or by using
> /etc/sysctl.conf
duh... I meant dns domain name
the dns serving you is set in /etc/resolv.conf
Pf
--
---
On Mon, Dec 25, 2000 at 02:27:53PM -0800, Robin Rowe wrote:
> Dumb question, how do I set the IP address, netmask, gateway, and dns host
> on Debian? The docs say that I should edit a file named 'network' but I
> don't find any such file.
/etc/network/interfaces is where you may want to look. Her
:-> "Robin" == Robin Rowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Dumb question, how do I set the IP address, netmask, gateway, and dns host
> on Debian? The docs say that I should edit a file named 'network' but I
> don't find any such file.
the docs are outdated. check for a file named /etc/
Check "man interfaces"
On Monday 25 December 2000 04:27 pm, Robin Rowe wrote:
> Dumb question, how do I set the IP address, netmask, gateway, and
> dns host on Debian? The docs say that I should edit a file named
> 'network' but I don't find any such file.
>
> Robin
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Pascal Hos
1 - 100 of 159 matches
Mail list logo
