David Carlile wrote:
>
> Thank you very much. I don't feel too dumb... There wasn't any sort of error
> message.
There would have been one if you had run it from an xterm. Try it and
see - load an xterm and type "netscape". If you're root, you'll see the
error.
The restriction that Netscape can'
figured it out myself... :)
backed up .netscape directory and deleted it. NS made a new one for me.
-Original Message-
From: David Carlile [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2001 8:52 PM
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: RE: Newbie: Netscape woes
Thank you very
oked for hidden files
but no.
-Original Message-
From: D.B.E. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2001 8:22 PM
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Newbie: Netscape woes
> I go to my applications menu and click on Communicator. Nothing.
> Nada. Zip.
> I am
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 08:16:52PM -0700, David Carlile wrote:
>
>apt-get install communicator navigator netscape
navigator would suffice
>It looks on my cd rom for the packages and reports back that they
>aren't there. I go out on my install disk and find NS3. I run the
The
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 08:16:52PM -0700, David Carlile wrote:
> I go to my applications menu and click on Communicator. Nothing. Nada. Zip.
> I am going to shelf the rant/whine and just ask... Does anybody have any
> idea why Netscape will not launch? Is it my old non-deb install that I never
>
> I go to my applications menu and click on Communicator. Nothing.
> Nada. Zip.
> I am going to shelf the rant/whine and just ask... Does anybody
> have any
> idea why Netscape will not launch? Is it my old non-deb install
> that I never
> uninstalled? Please help! I almost bought a shrink-wrapped
Have you ever felt
like you were the butt of some cosmic joke that everyone else was in on but you?
Oh well. I will hold off on the newbie rant. I am trying to set up a
Linux/Netscape test machine to test web applications. I got Debian up and
running including X and my nic card. TCP/IP seems
apt-get install netscape Also works well and get all the depends
right. I do agree though that three or four installs are about
right for learning. I would suggest that you try to apt-get
everything you can things IMHO just work better that way.
-- Original Message --
on Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 12:51:45PM -0600, ktb ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 08:12:22AM -0500, Howell Caton wrote:
> >
> > As a complete newbie, I had to install linux 2.2 several times before I got
> > all the kinks worked out. Each time I downloaded netscape 2.76 from
> >
Why not just install the Debian package(s) for 4.76 (assuming you are
running potato or later). This work fine for me. IIRC the "bus error"
is avoided by the wrapper script which is contained in the Debian
package installation.
On Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 08:12:22AM -0500, Howell Caton wrote:
>
> A
On Mon, Jan 22, 2001 at 08:12:22AM -0500, Howell Caton wrote:
>
> As a complete newbie, I had to install linux 2.2 several times before I got
> all the kinks worked out. Each time I downloaded netscape 2.76 from
> ftp.netscape.com. I'd get the error message "libstdc++=libc6.1-1.so.2
> not availa
As a complete newbie, I had to install linux 2.2 several times before I got
all the kinks worked out. Each time I downloaded netscape 2.76 from
ftp.netscape.com. I'd get the error message "libstdc++=libc6.1-1.so.2
not available". I solved that by linking it to libstdc++=libc6.1-2.so.3,
which is
Cameron Matheson wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I am having the worst time with netscape. It worked beautifully for a
> while, but now the toolbars are all monochrome. The Webpages look fine,
> but the toolbars are monochrome. Quake is also monochrome. The Debian
> Online Help is monochrome too.
Bart writes:
> Did you by any chance change your color depth to 24-bit? That happened
> for me too. Changed it to 24-bit after getting a graphics card that could
> handle it and then Netscape went bad. I don't think there's any other
> solution except to go to 16-bit or 32-bit.
I am running my G40
> I am having the worst time with netscape. It worked beautifully for a
> while, but now the toolbars are all monochrome. The Webpages look fine,
> but the toolbars are monochrome. Quake is also monochrome. The Debian
> Online Help is monochrome too. Everything else is fine (colorful). I
> ha
Hello everyone,
I am having the worst time with netscape. It worked beautifully for a
while, but now the toolbars are all monochrome. The Webpages look fine,
but the toolbars are monochrome. Quake is also monochrome. The Debian
Online Help is monochrome too. Everything else is fine (colorful)
On Sat, Feb 06, 1999 at 07:16:24PM -0800, Doug Thistlethwaite wrote:
> Ok, I removed the .netscape directory and now the script in
> /usr/bin/X11/netscape works
> fine. (This seems to start v4.05) This is when I get the "Aborted." error
> message.
>
> Now if I type /usr/local/netscape/netscape
Ok, I removed the .netscape directory and now the script in
/usr/bin/X11/netscape works
fine. (This seems to start v4.05) This is when I get the "Aborted." error
message.
Now if I type /usr/local/netscape/netscape I still get the bus error. I wonder
if
anyone else is having problems with v4.5
I got the "bus error" message repeatedly some time ago for absolutely no
apparent reason. I moved my ~/.netscape/ directory to .netscape.screwed/
and ran it again, and it gave the "you haven't run netscape before" dialog
and set itself up again and worked fine. I never figured out what was
cha
Hello,
I hope someone can help with this.
I have been using netscape 4.05 for some time without a hitch. Recently, my
disk ran out of space and sense then, my netscape will not run (I fixed the disk
space problem BTW). I get the message "Aborted." when I try to start it from a
command line.
To
> > Not so! Mozilla may not be the wonderful GPL'd program I would like
it
> > to be, but it's still free.
> >
> > Unless you consider that Mozilla isn't quite from Netscape...
> >
>
> So what happens when AOL decides not to support Mozilla any further?
The joke about Mozilla n
> Not so! Mozilla may not be the wonderful GPL'd program I would like it
> to be, but it's still free.
>
> Unless you consider that Mozilla isn't quite from Netscape...
>
So what happens when AOL decides not to support Mozilla any further?
Richard Lyon wrote:
>
> The browser works well, maybe even better than IE5. V4.5 may be the last free
> browser from netscape, so enjoy it while you can!
Not so! Mozilla may not be the wonderful GPL'd program I would like it
to be, but it's still free.
Unless you consider that M
Richard Lyon wrote:
>
> What's the fuss about? Just download it yourself and install it. Apart from
> configuration data, all of netscape resides in /usr/local/netscape, so you can
> upgrade to newer versions easily.
>
> The browser works well, maybe even better than IE5. V4.5 may be the last fre
What's the fuss about? Just download it yourself and install it. Apart from
configuration data, all of netscape resides in /usr/local/netscape, so you can
upgrade to newer versions easily.
The browser works well, maybe even better than IE5. V4.5 may be the last free
browser from netscape, so en
Jonathan Crowe wrote:
>
> Ed Cogburn wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Question #1: The location /usr/local is reserved (by the Filesystem
> > Standard) for packages/programs you the local admin/user installs
> > yourself. These programs are not known by the Debian/dpkg system. dpkg
> > is not allo
Oliver Elphick wrote:
>
> Ed Cogburn wrote:
> > Question #1: The location /usr/local is reserved (by the Filesystem
> >Standard) for packages/programs you the local admin/user installs
> >yourself. These programs are not known by the Debian/dpkg system. dpkg
> >is not allowed to do
Ed Cogburn wrote:
>
>
> Question #1: The location /usr/local is reserved (by the Filesystem
> Standard) for packages/programs you the local admin/user installs
> yourself. These programs are not known by the Debian/dpkg system. dpkg
> is not allowed to do anything in /usr/local, thus it
Ed Cogburn wrote:
> Question #1: The location /usr/local is reserved (by the Filesystem
>Standard) for packages/programs you the local admin/user installs
>yourself. These programs are not known by the Debian/dpkg system. dpkg
>is not allowed to do anything in /usr/local, thus it mus
Jonathan Crowe wrote:
>
> > El Fri, 20 Nov 1998, George Bonser escribió:
> >
> > >Just exactly what is the procedure now to install netscape? I made the
> > >mistake of "upgrading" netscape from slink to 4.07 ... then tried 4.5 ...
> > >I have no netscape program anymore. There is a wrapper, if I
> El Fri, 20 Nov 1998, George Bonser escribió:
>
> >Just exactly what is the procedure now to install netscape? I made the
> >mistake of "upgrading" netscape from slink to 4.07 ... then tried 4.5 ...
> >I have no netscape program anymore. There is a wrapper, if I link to it
> >from, say, /usr/bi
George Bonser wrote:
>
> On Sat, 21 Nov 1998, Ed Cogburn wrote:
>
> >
> > Remco's answer is correct. The actual NS binary is in the last
> > package
> > he lists, 'xxx-smotif-xxx'.
>
> This dod not seam to help. I went so far as to delete all the netscape
> packages and then download the
George Bonser wrote:
>
> Just exactly what is the procedure now to install netscape? I made the
> mistake of "upgrading" netscape from slink to 4.07 ... then tried 4.5 ...
> I have no netscape program anymore. There is a wrapper, if I link to it
> from, say, /usr/bin, it complains that I have no n
El Fri, 20 Nov 1998, George Bonser escribió:
>Just exactly what is the procedure now to install netscape? I made the
>mistake of "upgrading" netscape from slink to 4.07 ... then tried 4.5 ...
>I have no netscape program anymore. There is a wrapper, if I link to it
>from, say, /usr/bin, it complain
On Fri, Nov 20, 1998 at 01:00:22AM -0800, George Bonser wrote:
: WHat is the proper procedure after installing the deb to get a web
: browser.
You need to install these packages in order to get a working Netscape 4.5:
dists/slink/main/binary-all/devel/dpkg-awk_0.7.1.deb
dists/slink/contrib
35 matches
Mail list logo
