On 24/02/2014 10:21, Brian wrote:
> the OP could consider doing (as root)
>
>setcap cap_net_bind_service=+ep /usr/bin/ncat
>
> as a solution to his problem.
If they do, they should be aware that would essentially permit any user
on the machine to bind to any port; since nc is a redirection s
On Mon 24 Feb 2014 at 20:18:16 +1100, Scott Ferguson wrote:
> On 24/02/14 20:07, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> > I'd include socat in the list, but perhaps it's command line options
> > are different? socat is my preferred network swiss army knife.
> >
> > A little different, but there are also netsed
On 24/02/14 20:07, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> I'd include socat in the list, but perhaps it's command line options
> are different? socat is my preferred network swiss army knife.
>
> A little different, but there are also netsed, netrw etc.
>
>
And the excellent crypcat - but I just counted the
I'd include socat in the list, but perhaps it's command line options
are different? socat is my preferred network swiss army knife.
A little different, but there are also netsed, netrw etc.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troubl
On 24/02/14 15:44, Peter Easthope wrote:
> References:
> <530a9882.4040...@gmail.com>
>
> From: Scott Ferguson
> Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 11:55:30 +1100
>> NOTE: there four different "netcats" available in Wheezy.
>
> I found three.
> netcat-openbsd, netcat-traditional, netcat6.
OK. I miscounted
References:
<530a9882.4040...@gmail.com>
From: Scott Ferguson
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2014 11:55:30 +1100
> NOTE: there four different "netcats" available in Wheezy.
I found three.
netcat-openbsd, netcat-traditional, netcat6.
netcat-openbsd pleads ignorance.
peter@dalton:~$ nc -l 25 -e ssmtp
nc: inv
On 24/02/14 07:49, Peter Easthope wrote:
> References: <9802e1a04541ccc2a9d2c5d8b89c6c0f.squir...@easthope.ca>
> <23022014193900.3e6e4cc30...@desktop.copernicus.demon.co.uk>
>
> I'll be putting References in the header again soon.
>
> From: Brian
> Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2014 19:43:12 +
>> Which
David Glover-Aoki a écrit :
>
> Only the superuser can bind to ports below 1024.
Actually not. It just requires that the process has the
CAP_NET_BIND_SERVICE capability.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas.
On Sun 23 Feb 2014 at 12:49:30 -0800, Peter Easthope wrote:
> References: <9802e1a04541ccc2a9d2c5d8b89c6c0f.squir...@easthope.ca>
> <23022014193900.3e6e4cc30...@desktop.copernicus.demon.co.uk>
>
> I'll be putting References in the header again soon.
>
> From: Brian
> Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2014 19:4
References: <9802e1a04541ccc2a9d2c5d8b89c6c0f.squir...@easthope.ca>
<23022014193900.3e6e4cc30...@desktop.copernicus.demon.co.uk>
I'll be putting References in the header again soon.
From: Brian
Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2014 19:43:12 +
> Which netcat are you using?
[user@computer ~]$ nc --version
On Sun, 23 Feb 2014 09:15:59 -0800
"Peter Easthope" wrote:
> Ncat: bind to :::25: Permission denied. QUITTING.
Only the superuser can bind to ports below 1024.
--
David Glover-Aoki
http://david.gloveraoki.net/contact
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Sun 23 Feb 2014 at 09:15:59 -0800, Peter Easthope wrote:
> Can anyone offer a solution for this?
>
> [user@computer ~]$ nc -l 25 -e /usr/sbin/ssmtp
> Ncat: bind to :::25: Permission denied. QUITTING.
Which netcat are you using? Mine (which I will not reveal :) ) does does
not offer -e as an o
"Peter Easthope" writes:
> Can anyone offer a solution for this?
>
> [user@computer ~]$ nc -l 25 -e /usr/sbin/ssmtp
> Ncat: bind to :::25: Permission denied. QUITTING.
Maybe you need to be root? I doubt regular users can bind to ports below
1024.
-- Mark
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-us
Can anyone offer a solution for this?
[user@computer ~]$ nc -l 25 -e /usr/sbin/ssmtp
Ncat: bind to :::25: Permission denied. QUITTING.
Thanks,... Peter E.
--
Telephone 1 360 639 0202. Bcc: peter at easthope.ca "http://carnot.yi.org/ "
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to deb
14 matches
Mail list logo
