Re: netatalk experiences

Hi, Am Sonntag, den 11.12.2005, 21:59 -0500 schrieb mw: > I'm considering using Debian and netatalk for our macintosh hard drive > backup of files. This would be instead of windows2000 with services for > macintosh.We have had some problem with resource forks getting messed up > copying files f

Re: netatalk experiences

On Sun, 2005-12-11 at 21:59 -0500, mw wrote: > 1. Will netatalk treat resource fork better? > 2. Is it troublefree from an admin stance? I've used it for several years with RH, Gentoo, and Debian, and it's worked flawlessly. It's always been completely passive -- just storing and serving Mac file

netatalk experiences

I'm considering using Debian and netatalk for our macintosh hard drive backup of files. This would be instead of windows2000 with services for macintosh.We have had some problem with resource forks getting messed up copying files from windows 2003 server (using Xinet) to windows 2000 server wit