Re: naming of debian distributions

Hello >> If you installed it using the official woody CDs it's very unlikely >> that you >> have an unstable source in you apt list. But to answer your question: > > I don't believe this is correct. > > I recall there was (is?) a bug in the official distribution which caused > woody CDs to repor

Re: naming of debian distributions

On Sat, 12 Jul 2003 17:05:02 -0600 Francisco Castellon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If you installed it using the official woody CDs it's very unlikely that > you > have an unstable source in you apt list. But to answer your question: I don't believe this is correct. I recall there was (is?) a

Re: naming of debian distributions

On Sat, Jul 12, 2003 at 05:05:02PM -0600, Francisco Castellon wrote: > So which one is potatoe? Potato is version 2.2 it used to be the stable version before Woody (3.0) was released. Bijan pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

RE: naming of debian distributions

So which one is potatoe? -Original Message- From: Christian Schoenebeck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, June 15, 2003 8:10 AM To: matt zagrabelny Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: naming of debian distributions Es geschah am Sonntag, 15. Juni 2003 15:10 als matt zagrabelny

Re: naming of debian distributions

* Frederiks, P. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030615 17:26]: > The official woody CD's I have create apt.sources lines containing > the word 'unstable'. I don't know why, but I do know for sure this is > the official woody-release and NOT sid. This is a known problem. See http://bugs.debian.org/157014 Si

RE: naming of debian distributions

Title: RE: naming of debian distributions The official woody CD's I have create apt.sources lines containing the word 'unstable'. I don't know why, but I do know for sure this is the official woody-release and NOT sid.

Re: naming of debian distributions

* matt zagrabelny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030615 15:10]: > i installed debian using the woody cds. but in my sources.list i have > all my paths set to unstable. am i running sid or woody? There is a small bug with the Woody CDs, so that the disks are identified as "unstable disks". Please have a vi

Re: naming of debian distributions

i manually changed sources.list [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cat /etc/debian_version testing/unstable thanks for the info. -matt On Sun, 2003-06-15 at 09:09, Christian Schoenebeck wrote: > Es geschah am Sonntag, 15. Juni 2003 15:10 als matt zagrabelny schrieb: > > hi, > > > > i installed debian using t

Re: naming of debian distributions

* Christian Schoenebeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030615 16:09]: > If you installed it using the official woody CDs it's very unlikely that you > have an unstable source in you apt list. According to http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=157014 you have unstable sources (for the disks) afte

Re: naming of debian distributions

Es geschah am Sonntag, 15. Juni 2003 15:10 als matt zagrabelny schrieb: > hi, > > i installed debian using the woody cds. but in my sources.list i have > all my paths set to unstable. am i running sid or woody? If you installed it using the official woody CDs it's very unlikely that you have an u

Re: naming of debian distributions

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, Jun 15, 2003 at 08:10:12AM -0500, matt zagrabelny wrote: > i installed debian using the woody cds. but in my sources.list i have > all my paths set to unstable. am i running sid or woody? Sid. - -- .''`. Baloo Ursidae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]

naming of debian distributions

hi, i installed debian using the woody cds. but in my sources.list i have all my paths set to unstable. am i running sid or woody? -matt zagrabelny -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]