Re: mutt trashes mail

1999-01-29 Thread Daniel González Gasull
Hi! Mike Schmitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Jan 27, 1999 at 08:33:00AM +1000, Alan Eugene Davis wrote: > > I lost a large slug of mail. Just gone. I have > > just been leaving mail in the mail spoon. Mutt > > has a habit of trashing that file. > Check +mbox. The default behaviour o

Re: mutt trashes mail

1999-01-28 Thread Mike Schmitz
On Wed, Jan 27, 1999 at 08:33:00AM +1000, Alan Eugene Davis wrote: > I am afraid to try mutt again. After a long hiattus, I tried mutt again > after some version changes. > > I lost a large slug of mail. Just gone. I have just been leaving mail in > the mail spoon. Mutt has a habit of trashi

Re: mutt trashes mail

1999-01-27 Thread Alexander N. Benner
hi Ship's Log, Lt. Alan Eugene Davis, Stardate 270199.0833: > I am afraid to try mutt again. After a long hiattus, I tried mutt again > after some version changes. > > I lost a large slug of mail. Just gone. I have just been leaving mail in > the mail spoon. Mutt has a habit of trashing tha

Re: mutt trashes mail

1999-01-26 Thread homega
Alan Eugene Davis dixit: > I am afraid to try mutt again. After a long hiattus, I tried mutt again > after some version changes. > > I lost a large slug of mail. Just gone. I have just been leaving mail in > the mail spoon. Mutt has a habit of trashing that file. > > Can anybody corrobora

mutt trashes mail

1999-01-26 Thread Alan Eugene Davis
I am afraid to try mutt again. After a long hiattus, I tried mutt again after some version changes. I lost a large slug of mail. Just gone. I have just been leaving mail in the mail spoon. Mutt has a habit of trashing that file. Can anybody corroborate this behavior? Has this kind of pro

Re: Re: mutt trashes mail

1998-11-06 Thread David Wright
Quoting Leon Breedt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > On Wed, Nov 04 1998, David Wright spake thus: > > > Takes up 1.6MB though :( > try 'strip' on the executable, or turning off the '-g' option > to your compiler in the Makefile. my mutt executable is only > +/-400KB. Thanks. I'll do that to procmail too!

Re: mutt trashes mail

1998-11-05 Thread Leon Breedt
On Wed, Nov 04 1998, David Wright spake thus: > Takes up 1.6MB though :( try 'strip' on the executable, or turning off the '-g' option to your compiler in the Makefile. my mutt executable is only +/-400KB. regards, leon -- __ _ Leon Breedt-o)

Re: mutt trashes mail

1998-11-04 Thread David Wright
Quoting Alan Eugene Davis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > I upgraded mutt to v 0.93.2-1. Now all mail that has been read is deleted > from my inbox. > > Is there a configuration issue? It may depend where you're coming from. I new in from pine, and built my .muttrc from "Sven's". It mentions that "hold

mutt trashes mail

1998-11-01 Thread Alan Eugene Davis
I upgraded mutt to v 0.93.2-1. Now all mail that has been read is deleted from my inbox. Is there a configuration issue? alan davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]