Re: mutt procmail NEWBIE

2002-03-05 Thread will trillich
On Sun, Mar 03, 2002 at 06:47:13PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Sun, Mar 03, 2002 at 08:35:29AM -0900, jerry wrote: > > I should also mention, if mutt still complains about the > > files as not being a mailbox, you will have to delete and > > recreate them. As I mentioned earlier, I had thi

Re: mutt procmail NEWBIE

2002-03-03 Thread jerry
> > I've gotten hold of the drill; echo>usernamebox; ae usernamebox. (The latter > is for removing the final white-space; when Mutt works, I'll get to vi or > emacs. They both scare me) > > I think it's in the headers that procmail/fetchmail delivers. I'll > experiment on it and make sure to

Re: mutt procmail NEWBIE

2002-03-03 Thread frans
On Sun, Mar 03, 2002 at 08:35:29AM -0900, jerry wrote: > > > > Are you sure? SCHADUW=${MAILDIR}/schaduw does say it's in > > /home/snotty/Mail/schaduw?? > > > No, not sure what you are using for a referance. That's ok then; you had me there > > > I should also mention, if mutt still complain

Re: mutt procmail NEWBIE

2002-03-03 Thread jerry
> > Are you sure? SCHADUW=${MAILDIR}/schaduw does say it's in > /home/snotty/Mail/schaduw?? > No, not sure what you are using for a referance. > Almost there > > Thanks again! > Frans > > > I should also mention, if mutt still complains about the files as not being a mailbox, you will have

Re: mutt procmail NEWBIE

2002-03-03 Thread jerry
> > > mda '/usr/bin/procmail' > > > > > > > I also had the mda line as well in my .muttrc, I think this may have > > been the culprit causing the error with the mailbox not being recognized > > as being a mailbox, don't know for sure, but it's not commented out > > and seems to work fine. > > N

Re: mutt procmail NEWBIE

2002-03-03 Thread frans
On Sun, Mar 03, 2002 at 03:11:06PM +0100, Morten Bo Johansen wrote: [...] > >However able to get the mail delivered where I want to, Mutt > >complains that the destination box (spoolfile) is not a mail > >box. I don't have a clue as to where I must look. > > This was snipped from your .muttrc >

Re: mutt procmail NEWBIE

2002-03-03 Thread frans
On Sun, Mar 03, 2002 at 06:08:27AM -0900, jerry wrote: > > However able to get the mail delivered where I want to, Mutt complains that > > the destination box (spoolfile) is not a mail box. > > I don't have a clue as to where I must look. The documentation of > > procmail/mutt requires expert-ins

Re: mutt procmail NEWBIE

2002-03-03 Thread jerry
On Sun, Mar 03, 2002 at 01:59:16PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > However able to get the mail delivered where I want to, Mutt complains that > the destination box (spoolfile) is not a mail box. > I don't have a clue as to where I must look. The documentation of > procmail/mutt requires

Re: mutt procmail NEWBIE

2002-03-03 Thread Morten Bo Johansen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I've been attempting to get my Mutt going but it's giving me a hard time I've included .procmailrc .muttrc .forward .fetchmailrc . If there's more, please let me know [...] However able to get the mail delivered where I want to, Mutt complains that

mutt procmail NEWBIE

2002-03-03 Thread frans
Hai all, I've been attempting to get my Mutt going but it's giving me a hard time I've included .procmailrc .muttrc .forward .fetchmailrc . If there's more, please let me know Did not include /etc/Muttrc as it is the default. Using Debian-woody; I do not use exim, trying to use ssmtp and procmai