On Sun, 16 Nov 2003 at 06:49 GMT, ScruLoose penned:
>
> I need to start keeping a list of little tweaks I'm making all over
> the system, so I'll be able to roll them out on later installs...
>
I keep various config files in cvs. Makes it really easy to sync up
accounts on multiple systems. Of
On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 11:10:25AM +0100, Florian Ernst wrote:
> Hello 'ScruLoose'!
Howdy, Flo!
> On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 07:13:31PM -0500, ScruLoose wrote:
> >I wonder whether the .muttrc is flexible enough to support something
> >like looking for known "list" addresses when you hit r, and givin
On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 11:10:25AM +0100, Florian Ernst wrote:
> How about adding
> macro index r
> macro pager r
> to you .muttrc?
>
> It will just act as usual when only a reply seems possible and
> automatically do a list-reply otherwise. It even beeps once in this
> case ;)
This is beautifu
Hello 'ScruLoose'!
On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 07:13:31PM -0500, ScruLoose wrote:
I wonder whether the .muttrc is flexible enough to support something
like looking for known "list" addresses when you hit r, and giving you
an "are you sure?" prompt...
Somehow I doubt the .muttrc file is up to that job,
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 05:03:35PM +, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 10:42:09AM -0500, ScruLoose wrote:
>
> > Wouldn't it be easier to use mutt's builtin support for mailing lists?
> >
> > Add the line
> > subscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > somewhere in your .muttrc,
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 05:03:35PM +, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> I do use mutt's built-in support for mailing lists. However, like many
> people it seems (especially on debian-user); I occasionally hit 'r' to
> reply to a list-post rather than L, and I don't have a copy of what I
> wrote to post
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 10:42:09AM -0500, ScruLoose wrote:
> Wouldn't it be easier to use mutt's builtin support for mailing lists?
>
> Add the line
> subscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> somewhere in your .muttrc, and then use L for "reply-to-list"...
I do use mutt's built-in support for maili
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 12:58:29PM +, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> I wrote the following configuration items for mutt, in an attempt to end
> the accidentally-replied-to-poster-rather-than-mailing-list problem:
>
> folder-hook debian 'bind index r list-reply'
> folder-hook debian 'b
I wrote the following configuration items for mutt, in an attempt to end
the accidentally-replied-to-poster-rather-than-mailing-list problem:
folder-hook debian 'bind index r list-reply'
folder-hook debian 'bind pager r list-reply'
folder-hook !debian 'bind index r reply'
* Robert Land ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I had a try what you had suggested but it
> confused my .xsession settings. Actually I'm
> very bad in "X" too and cannot quite follow
> what you intended.
> Why should mutt's behaviour change when
> putting your line into .Xresources?
> Mutt has it's ow
On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 04:24:03PM +, eb wrote:
> meta+b and meta+f are not functions of mutt, they're functions of your
> Xterm or if you're on a tty you termcap.
>
> Put this in your .Xresources and you should find that all's well again.
>
> XTerm*modifier: alt
>
> Cheers,
>
> Euan
> * Ro
meta+b and meta+f are not functions of mutt, they're functions of your
Xterm or if you're on a tty you termcap.
Put this in your .Xresources and you should find that all's well again.
XTerm*modifier: alt
Cheers,
Euan
* Robert Land ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Does the latest mutt release enable
Does the latest mutt release enable the emacs
key bindings Meta+b and Meta+f to jump wordwise
forth and back?
If so, would someone kindly paste the function
name and the key for "meta" so I may have a try
in Muttrc. The docs that came with mutt-0.9.deb
do not seem to contain any help on this speci
13 matches
Mail list logo
