Re: mutt: PGP send hooks

2002-10-28 Thread Paul Johnson
On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 03:48:04PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote: > You do have to be careful as you need to include a send-hook *above* > the one that disables pgp_autosign to allow mutt to return to the > original configuration: > > send-hook . "set pgp_autosign" Yes, yes, I know that and am d

Re: mutt: PGP send hooks

2002-10-28 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.10.28.1538 +0100]: > > Correct. This would be a feature. > > No. The idea is to have everything signed except to abuse and > postmaster anywhere. So you have to configure it that way. You do have to be careful as you need to include a send-hook

Re: mutt: PGP send hooks

2002-10-28 Thread Paul Johnson
On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 03:27:34PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote: > also sprach Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.10.28.1503 +0100]: > > And variants on everything suggested either results in an error or > > makes *everything* not get pgp signed... > > Correct. This would be a feature. No. T

Re: mutt: PGP send hooks

2002-10-28 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.10.28.1503 +0100]: > And variants on everything suggested either results in an error or > makes *everything* not get pgp signed... Correct. This would be a feature. > .''`. Baloo Ursidae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > : :' :proud Debian admin an

Re: mutt: PGP send hooks

2002-10-28 Thread Paul Johnson
On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 02:40:29PM +0100, Jesus Climent wrote: > > > send-hook "~C abuse | ~C postmaster ..." "unset pgp_autosign" > > > > OK, so will this hook work for any domain, or just abuse, etc > > unqualified? > > It will work for any mail sent to *abuse* or *postmaster* or *...* as > the

Re: mutt: PGP send hooks

2002-10-28 Thread Jesus Climent
On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 05:23:28AM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote: > On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 02:15:38PM +0100, Jesus Climent wrote: > > > Now, could I do something like > > > > > > send-hook "~C *[abuse|postmaster|webmaster|hostmaster]*" "unset pgp_autosign" > > > > send-hook "~C abuse | ~C postmaster

Re: mutt: PGP send hooks

2002-10-28 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.10.28.1423 +0100]: > OK, so will this hook work for any domain, or just abuse, etc > unqualified? For any domain. it "matches". -- .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' :proud Debian developer, admin, and user `. `'` `- De

Re: mutt: PGP send hooks

2002-10-28 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Jesus Climent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.10.28.1415 +0100]: > send-hook "~C abuse | ~C postmaster ..." "unset pgp_autosign" send-hook "~C \(abuse\|postmaster\)" "unset pgp_autosign -- .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' :proud Debian developer, admin, and user `.

Re: mutt: PGP send hooks

2002-10-28 Thread Paul Johnson
On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 02:15:38PM +0100, Jesus Climent wrote: > > Now, could I do something like > > > > send-hook "~C *[abuse|postmaster|webmaster|hostmaster]*" "unset pgp_autosign" > > send-hook "~C abuse | ~C postmaster ..." "unset pgp_autosign" OK, so will this hook work for any domain, or

Re: mutt: PGP send hooks

2002-10-28 Thread Jesus Climent
On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 05:09:27AM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote: > On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 01:33:42PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote: > > yes. check out file:///usr/share/doc/mutt/html/manual-4.html#ss4.2 > > and use regular expressions at your will. > > Now, could I do something like > > send-hook "~

Re: mutt: PGP send hooks

2002-10-28 Thread Paul Johnson
On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 01:33:42PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote: > yes. check out file:///usr/share/doc/mutt/html/manual-4.html#ss4.2 > and use regular expressions at your will. Now, could I do something like send-hook "~C *[abuse|postmaster|webmaster|hostmaster]*" "unset pgp_autosign" and have

Re: mutt: PGP send hooks

2002-10-28 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.10.28.1323 +0100]: > > send-hook "~C " "unset pgp_autosign" > > OK. What's a wildcard so I can have it unset pgp_autosign for > standard email addresses like postmaster, abuse, etc? yes. check out file:///usr/share/doc/mutt/html/manual-4.html#ss

Re: mutt: PGP send hooks

2002-10-28 Thread Paul Johnson
On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 01:17:51PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote: > send-hook "~C " "unset pgp_autosign" OK. What's a wildcard so I can have it unset pgp_autosign for standard email addresses like postmaster, abuse, etc? -- Baloo msg09649/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: mutt: PGP send hooks

2002-10-28 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.10.28.1312 +0100]: > Is it possible to make a send hook that will tell mutt not to sign the > message by default? send-hook "~C " "unset pgp_autosign" -- .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' :proud Debian developer, admin, a

mutt: PGP send hooks

2002-10-28 Thread Paul Johnson
Is it possible to make a send hook that will tell mutt not to sign the message by default? -- Baloo msg09645/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature