Re: mutt's IMAP support

2008-02-07 Thread Jochen Schulz
Steve Lamb: > Jochen Schulz wrote: >> I am now seeing that mutt has a "trash" option which moves mail to a >> designated trash folder instead of deleting from the server. I don't use >> that, though. (Coincidentally, it appears to be buggy: #448241.) > > And it is this that I was referring to

Re: mutt's IMAP support

2008-02-07 Thread Steve Lamb
Jochen Schulz wrote: I am now seeing that mutt has a "trash" option which moves mail to a designated trash folder instead of deleting from the server. I don't use that, though. (Coincidentally, it appears to be buggy: #448241.) And it is this that I was referring to since it is what matches

mutt's IMAP support (was: What am I missing without mutt?)

2008-02-07 Thread Jochen Schulz
Steve Lamb: > Jochen Schulz wrote: > > The main problem that I saw is that on delete operations it does > something that is insanely slower than TBird. For example, on TBird I > can mark 25 messages as deleted, hit delete, and within about a second > they are in the trash folder. Deletion in