Re: bookworm multimedia scripts silent in console but play in mate-terminal

Pipewire is now on this machine since this didn't work with pulseaudio either. -- Jude "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." Ed Howdershelt 1940. On Thu, 13 Apr 2023, Dan Ritter wrote: > Jude DaShiell wrote: > > Here's

Re: bookworm multimedia scripts silent in console but play in mate-terminal

Jude DaShiell wrote: > Here's one script that works that way. Standard package install choices > were done desktop environment, mate, and standard utilities. > An install with only standard utilities and no desktop environment and no > mate prevents this script from playing at all. > #!/usr/bin/

bookworm multimedia scripts silent in console but play in mate-terminal

Here's one script that works that way. Standard package install choices were done desktop environment, mate, and standard utilities. An install with only standard utilities and no desktop environment and no mate prevents this script from playing at all. Mpv is already installed on this machine too

Re: about https://wiki.debian.org/Multimedia

awesome-linuxaudio https://wiki.debian.org/Multimedia?action=info indicates that at 2019-08-16 it was nodiscc2-guest/awesome-linuxaudio and at 2021-10-28 it was nodiscc/awesome-linuxaudio. > But the page shows currently a certain distance from the git content. > So is this still true [...]

about https://wiki.debian.org/Multimedia

Hi, I have done a little change to its content but then I realized that it is written that the list is generated from: https://salsa.debian.org/nodiscc2-guest/awesome-linuxaudio I think that it should be: https://salsa.debian.org/nodiscc/awesome-linuxaudio But the page shows currently a certain

Recognize Razer BlackWidow 2014 multimedia keys

I'm trying to bind multimedia keys by their names: $ grep mpc ~/.config/i3/config bindsym XF86AudioPrev exec --no-startup-id mpc prev bindsym XF86AudioNext exec --no-startup-id mpc next Those bindings didn't work. `xev` didn't recognize "keypress" events w

Re: odvr for Olympus WN-960PC : problem installing multimedia repository on Stretch

Bernard wrote: > True enough, the package odvr is not in any Debian repository. Reading > more carefully the same doc from Ray Woodcocks, I found a Google storage > place where said package could be downloaded > > https://code.google.com/archive/p/odvr/downloads > > But... trying to install > >

Re: odvr for Olympus WN-960PC : problem installing multimedia repository on Stretch

True enough, the package odvr is not in any Debian repository. Reading more carefully the same doc from Ray Woodcocks, I found a Google storage place where said package could be downloaded https://code.google.com/archive/p/odvr/downloads But... trying to install #dpkg -i odvr_0.1.4.1_i386.deb

Re: odvr for Olympus WN-960PC : problem installing multimedia repository on Stretch

On 9/24/18 7:36 AM, Bernard wrote: > Hi to Everyone, > > I recently discovered that I could run that old voice recorder on > Debian. According to what I read on > > https://raywoodcockslatest.wordpress.com/2016/05/15/linux-vn960pc/ > > it works well once this : > > odvr_0.1.4.1_i386.deb > > i

Re: odvr for Olympus WN-960PC : problem installing multimedia repository on Stretch

On 9/24/18 7:36 AM, Bernard wrote: > Hi to Everyone, > > I recently discovered that I could run that old voice recorder on > Debian. According to what I read on > > https://raywoodcockslatest.wordpress.com/2016/05/15/linux-vn960pc/ > > it works well once this : > > odvr_0.1.4.1_i386.deb > > i

Re: odvr for Olympus WN-960PC : problem installing multimedia repository on Stretch

Bernard wrote: > Hi to Everyone, > > I recently discovered that I could run that old voice recorder on > Debian. According to what I read on > > https://raywoodcockslatest.wordpress.com/2016/05/15/linux-vn960pc/ > > it works well once this : > > odvr_0.1.4.1_i386.deb > > is installed (or mayb

odvr for Olympus WN-960PC : problem installing multimedia repository on Stretch

Hi to Everyone, I recently discovered that I could run that old voice recorder on Debian. According to what I read on https://raywoodcockslatest.wordpress.com/2016/05/15/linux-vn960pc/ it works well once this : odvr_0.1.4.1_i386.deb is installed (or maybe something more recent...). Problem

Multimedia problem (Qt5)

you Debian folks. Output from *sudo dmesg* <https://pastebin.com/VY243fPh> Also, if anyone is wondering where I asked for help for Qt, *here* <https://forum.qt.io/topic/77348/problem-with-qt-multimedia/63>. Thanks a lot!

Re: After upgrade to jessie usb keyboard multimedia keys stopped working [SOLVED]

s. Now after boot I have the multimedia keys and I do not need to unplug and plug again the keyboard to get them working. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.d

Re: After upgrade to jessie usb keyboard multimedia keys stopped working

For the record I found out that not the reinstall of packages helped the keyboard multimedia keys to work again, but rather subesquential unplug/plug to the system. For me it is still a big question why this is not working after system boot Here is what I see after replug If you have any idea

Re: After upgrade to jessie usb keyboard multimedia keys stopped working

Never give up - after trying different options examining different files I manage it to break all setup and no kbd or mouse working. Than I did apt-get --reinstall install xserver-xorg-input-kbd xserver-xorg-input-evdev xserver-xorg-input-evdev-dbg and all is working fine - the multimedia keys

Re: After upgrade to jessie usb keyboard multimedia keys stopped working

lly have, ie is that the actual model of > keyboard that you use? If not, I would set it to "pc104" for a US > keyboard, or "pc105" for an international keyboard. Those are the > "Generic 104-key PC" and "Generic 105-key (Intl) PC", respectively. I &

Re: After upgrade to jessie usb keyboard multimedia keys stopped working

or an international keyboard. Those are the "Generic 104-key PC" and "Generic 105-key (Intl) PC", respectively. I am not sure if that will help, since the multimedia keys don't register with xev, but it might be worth a shot. Just a guess on my part, though. Take a look a

Re: After upgrade to jessie usb keyboard multimedia keys stopped working

Petter Adsen wrote: > xev -event keyboard No they do not - any idea what direction I should dig. I see this in the Xorg.0.log [143241.089] (**) Option "xkb_rules" "evdev" [143241.089] (**) Option "xkb_model" "a4techKB21" [143241.089] (**) Option "xkb_layout" "us,de,bg" [143241.089] (**) Option

Re: After upgrade to jessie usb keyboard multimedia keys stopped working

On Sun, 29 Mar 2015 11:59:45 +0200 deloptes wrote: > Hi > as the title says I am unable to use the multimedia keys on the > keyboard since upgrade to jessie. > Do you have any hint, because all I find is information on how to fix > the multimedia keys in general, which is of n

After upgrade to jessie usb keyboard multimedia keys stopped working

Hi as the title says I am unable to use the multimedia keys on the keyboard since upgrade to jessie. Do you have any hint, because all I find is information on how to fix the multimedia keys in general, which is of no use. On the notebook the multimedia keys (Volume Up/Down and Mute) work fine

Re: Multimedia player for video filte type qs

On 2014-07-07, Bret Busby wrote: > > So, in vlc, the Tools -> Codec Details for Streams 0 and 1 (Video and > Audio), do not show a difference that easily shows to me, why the vlc > is unable to play a movie such as The Beguiled, as flowingly as other > movies such as Slaughterhouse Five. > Well a

Re: Multimedia player for video filte type qs

On 07/07/2014, Bob Proulx wrote: > Bret Busby wrote: > >> And, I have found that vlc (running on Debian 6), has a problem with >> some of the files, in that the output for some of the files, as with >> the output for mplayer, is choppy (if that is the correct term), >> meaning that it will play

Re: Multimedia player for video filte type qs

Bret Busby wrote: > ken wrote: > > Andrei POPESCU wrote: > >> Bret Busby wrote: > >>> I wonder whether a multimedia player for the video filteype .qs exists > >>> for Debian Linux. > >> > >> Just for the archives, the file extension

Re: Multimedia player for video filte type qs

On 07/07/2014, Bret Busby wrote: > On 07/07/2014, Bret Busby wrote: >> On 06/07/2014, ken wrote: >>> On 07/06/2014 06:32 AM Andrei POPESCU wrote: >>>> On Lu, 16 iun 14, 15:38:09, Bret Busby wrote: >>>>> Hello. >>>>> >>>>

Re: Multimedia player for video filte type qs

On 07/07/2014, Bret Busby wrote: > On 06/07/2014, ken wrote: >> On 07/06/2014 06:32 AM Andrei POPESCU wrote: >>> On Lu, 16 iun 14, 15:38:09, Bret Busby wrote: >>>> Hello. >>>> >>>> I wonder whether a multimedia player for the video filteype

Re: Multimedia player for video filte type qs

On 06/07/2014, ken wrote: > On 07/06/2014 06:32 AM Andrei POPESCU wrote: >> On Lu, 16 iun 14, 15:38:09, Bret Busby wrote: >>> Hello. >>> >>> I wonder whether a multimedia player for the video filteype .qs exists >>> for Debian Linux. >> >

Re: Multimedia player for video filte type qs

On 07/06/2014 06:32 AM Andrei POPESCU wrote: On Lu, 16 iun 14, 15:38:09, Bret Busby wrote: Hello. I wonder whether a multimedia player for the video filteype .qs exists for Debian Linux. Just for the archives, the file extension is a poor indicator of the file type and was originally meant

Re: Multimedia player for video filte type qs

On Lu, 16 iun 14, 15:38:09, Bret Busby wrote: > Hello. > > I wonder whether a multimedia player for the video filteype .qs exists > for Debian Linux. Just for the archives, the file extension is a poor indicator of the file type and was originally meant more as informatio

Re: Multimedia player for video filte type qs

On 17/06/2014, Rob Owens wrote: > On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 05:24:24PM +0800, Bret Busby wrote: >> vlc would open the file, but, Movie Player (mplayer ?) will not - it >> returns an error "failure to parse stream"). >> > Movie Player is probably Totem. In my experience, mplayer is better at > playi

Re: Multimedia player for video filte type qs

On 17/06/2014, Brian wrote: > On Tue 17 Jun 2014 at 17:24:24 +0800, Bret Busby wrote: > >> vlc would open the file, but, Movie Player (mplayer ?) will not - it >> returns an error "failure to parse stream"). > > There appears to be no information about this .qs file extension so it > would be inte

Re: Multimedia player for video filte type qs

On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 05:24:24PM +0800, Bret Busby wrote: > vlc would open the file, but, Movie Player (mplayer ?) will not - it > returns an error "failure to parse stream"). > Movie Player is probably Totem. In my experience, mplayer is better at playing obscure formats than Totem. VLC is go

Re: Multimedia player for video filte type qs

On Tue 17 Jun 2014 at 17:24:24 +0800, Bret Busby wrote: > vlc would open the file, but, Movie Player (mplayer ?) will not - it > returns an error "failure to parse stream"). There appears to be no information about this .qs file extension so it would be interesting to know what vlc thinks it is.

Re: Multimedia player for video filte type qs

On 17/06/2014, Bret Busby wrote: > > > Hello. > > Thank you to both the above poster, and to Chris Bannister. > And, thank you also to Brian, whom I neglected to thank, above. -- Bret Busby Armadale West Australia .. "So once you do know what the question actually is, you'll kno

Re: Multimedia player for video filte type qs

On 16/06/2014, Darac Marjal wrote: > On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 03:38:09PM +0800, Bret Busby wrote: >> Hello. >> >> I wonder whether a multimedia player for the video filteype .qs exists >> for Debian Linux. > > I would probably try "file somefile.qs" to se

Re: Multimedia player for video filte type qs

On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 12:34:13PM +0100, Darac Marjal wrote: > Next up, try VLC and/or mplayer on the file. Both of these players are > quite good at detecting file formats and may give you something useful. I think mplayer is being 'tossed' out of the archive. mpv is a good, if not better, repla

Re: Multimedia player for video filte type qs

On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 03:38:09PM +0800, Bret Busby wrote: > using File Manager, on a Debian 6 system, which shows the video files > as having the extension .qs, , but, on a Debian 7.5 amd64 xfce system, > using the file manager, it shows, in the instance of the last recorded > thumb drive, the vi

Re: Multimedia player for video filte type qs

On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 03:38:09PM +0800, Bret Busby wrote: > Hello. > > I wonder whether a multimedia player for the video filteype .qs exists > for Debian Linux. I would probably try "file somefile.qs" to see if it's an identifiable format. If file reports it to be

Re: Multimedia player for video filte type qs

On Mon 16 Jun 2014 at 15:38:09 +0800, Bret Busby wrote: > I wonder whether a multimedia player for the video filteype .qs exists > for Debian Linux. Have you tried playing it with vlc? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscrib

Multimedia player for video filte type qs

Hello. I wonder whether a multimedia player for the video filteype .qs exists for Debian Linux. The filetype is from a bodgy digital television that records (sometimes, when the facility works) to USB media, via some functionality named PVR. The television can sometimes find the media, and

Re: MythTV from deb-multimedia setup?

On Tue, Feb 04, 2014 at 05:40:27PM -0500, Jon N wrote: > Thanks to all, I will be taking my questions to the deb-multimedia > list, I should have thought of that. Quickly, before I go, I did > clean up my 'hosts' file a little and took care of that problem, > although it

Re: MythTV from deb-multimedia setup?

Thanks to all, I will be taking my questions to the deb-multimedia list, I should have thought of that. Quickly, before I go, I did clean up my 'hosts' file a little and took care of that problem, although it didn't solve the basic problem. And ~/.mythtv/config.xml is valid als

Re: MythTV from deb-multimedia setup?

On Mon, Feb 03, 2014 at 07:07:22PM -0500, Jon N wrote: > Hi, > > I've built a new machine and installed 64bit Debian testing on it. I > also installed MythTV from the deb-multimedia repository. My old > computer has been used for MythTV (mostly recording/playback over the

Re: MythTV from deb-multimedia setup?

On 04/02/14 11:07, Jon N wrote: > Hi, > > I've built a new machine and installed 64bit Debian testing on it. I > also installed MythTV from the *deb-multimedia repository*. > > I did read the README.Debian file for MythTV and tried running 'sudo > -u mythtv my

Re: MythTV from deb-multimedia setup?

On Mon, Feb 03, 2014 at 07:07:22PM -0500, Jon N wrote: > Hi, > > I've built a new machine and installed 64bit Debian testing on it. I > also installed MythTV from the deb-multimedia repository. My old This is the wrong list for questions about 3rd party packages. Also you&#x

MythTV from deb-multimedia setup?

Hi, I've built a new machine and installed 64bit Debian testing on it. I also installed MythTV from the deb-multimedia repository. My old computer has been used for MythTV (mostly recording/playback over the air TV) for years, and I would like to have the new hardware take over the job

Re: deb-multimedia repository

On Friday 23 August 2013 23:30:15 Robert Holtzm wrote: > On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 08:07:17PM +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > > On Fri, 2013-08-23 at 18:46 +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote: > > > What baffles me, is why you are reading and posting on this list if > > > you disapprove of Debian's politics. > > >

Re: deb-multimedia repository

On 8/23/2013 10:04 PM, John Hasler wrote: It is *probably* legal in the USA for Debian to distribute it. However, no one wants to find out the hard way that I am wrong about that, and in any case it's easy to get it elsewhere. Actually, probably NOT legal to distribute in the U.S., according

Re: deb-multimedia repository

> It is *probably* legal in the USA for Debian to distribute it. However, > no one wants to find out the hard way that I am wrong about that, and in > any case it's easy to get it elsewhere. > > Actually, probably NOT legal to distribute in the U.S., according to the > DMCA. See > http://en.wik

Re: deb-multimedia repository

On 8/23/2013 5:36 PM, John Hasler wrote: Dom writes: I thought the reason that libdvdcss(2) wasn't included in the Debian repos isn't because of any issues with the licensing, but because it may potentially be illegal to use in some areas due to the fact the it cracks copyright protection on med

Re: deb-multimedia repository

On Fri, 2013-08-23 at 15:30 -0700, Robert Holtzm wrote: > On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 08:07:17PM +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > > On Fri, 2013-08-23 at 18:46 +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote: > > > What baffles me, is why you are reading and posting on this list if > > > you disapprove of Debian's politics. > >

Re: deb-multimedia repository

On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 08:07:17PM +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > On Fri, 2013-08-23 at 18:46 +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote: > > What baffles me, is why you are reading and posting on this list if > > you disapprove of Debian's politics. > > Perhaps you killfiled me?! If not, here's my explanation. I'm an

Re: deb-multimedia repository

On Fri, 2013-08-23 at 16:36 -0500, John Hasler wrote: > Dom writes: > > I thought the reason that libdvdcss(2) wasn't included in the Debian > > repos isn't because of any issues with the licensing, but because it > > may potentially be illegal to use in some areas due to the fact the it > > cracks

Re: deb-multimedia repository

Dom writes: > I thought the reason that libdvdcss(2) wasn't included in the Debian > repos isn't because of any issues with the licensing, but because it > may potentially be illegal to use in some areas due to the fact the it > cracks copyright protection on media. It is *probably* legal in the U

Re: deb-multimedia repository

On 23/08/13 18:46, Lisi Reisz wrote: On Friday 23 August 2013 02:04:01 Doug wrote: My complaint is with Debian's politics: if it's not FOSS, you can't have it. I have non-FLOSS applications on my Debian computer. I also used an unofficial installer that had non-free drivers in. It was readil

Re: deb-multimedia repository

Hi, Dňa Fri, 23 Aug 2013 18:46:17 +0100 Lisi Reisz napísal: > On Friday 23 August 2013 02:04:01 Doug wrote: > > My complaint is with Debian's politics: if it's not FOSS, you can't > > have it. > > I have non-FLOSS applications on my Debian computer. I also used an > unofficial installer that

Re: deb-multimedia repository

On Fri, 2013-08-23 at 18:46 +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote: > What baffles me, is why you are reading and posting on this list if > you disapprove of Debian's politics. Perhaps you killfiled me?! If not, here's my explanation. I'm an Arch Linux user, but still take care about Debian users and the Ubuntu

Re: deb-multimedia repository

On Friday 23 August 2013 02:04:01 Doug wrote: > My complaint is with Debian's politics: if it's not FOSS, you can't have > it. I have non-FLOSS applications on my Debian computer. I also used an unofficial installer that had non-free drivers in. It was readily available, and I learnt about it

Re: deb-multimedia repository

On Thu, 22 Aug 2013 21:04:01 -0400 Doug wrote: > My complaint is with Debian's politics: if it's not FOSS, you can't > have it. That's just wrong. Why on Earth would there be a Non-Free repository otherwise? I have plenty of non-free software on my Debian Sid. See here:

Re: deb-multimedia repository

On 08/22/2013 07:41 PM, Bob Proulx wrote: > Doug wrote: >> Bob Proulx wrote: >>> Ralf Mardorf wrote: Did you ever need libdvdcss(2)? >>> >>> Only when playing DVDs. Or are you are asking if I ever *need* to >>> play a DVD? >> >> This exchange perfectly illustrates why I took Debian off my com

Re: deb-multimedia repository

Doug wrote: > Bob Proulx wrote: > > Ralf Mardorf wrote: > >> Did you ever need libdvdcss(2)? > > > > Only when playing DVDs. Or are you are asking if I ever *need* to > > play a DVD? > > This exchange perfectly illustrates why I took Debian off my computer > two-plus years ago. What software dis

Re: deb-multimedia repository

On 08/22/2013 06:09 PM, Bob Proulx wrote: > Ralf Mardorf wrote: >> On Thu, 2013-08-22 at 15:44 -0600, Bob Proulx wrote: >>> Chris Bannister wrote: That is a 3rd party repository and not supported by Debian, if you have any issues with that site or packages from that site please take it up

Re: deb-multimedia repository

Ralf Mardorf wrote: > Bob Proulx wrote: > > Ralf Mardorf wrote: > > > Did you ever need libdvdcss(2)? > > > > Only when playing DVDs. Or are you are asking if I ever *need* to > > play a DVD? > > IIRC when I played borrowed DVDs from a video rental store I _guess_ it > wasn't needed. I'm not abs

Re: deb-multimedia repository

On Thu, 2013-08-22 at 16:09 -0600, Bob Proulx wrote: > Ralf Mardorf wrote: > > On Thu, 2013-08-22 at 15:44 -0600, Bob Proulx wrote: > > > Chris Bannister wrote: > > > > That is a 3rd party repository and not supported by Debian, if you have > > > > any issues with that site or packages from that si

Re: deb-multimedia repository

Ralf Mardorf wrote: > On Thu, 2013-08-22 at 15:44 -0600, Bob Proulx wrote: > > Chris Bannister wrote: > > > That is a 3rd party repository and not supported by Debian, if you have > > > any issues with that site or packages from that site please take it up > > > with them. > > > > Specifically for

Re: deb-multimedia repository

On Thu, 2013-08-22 at 15:44 -0600, Bob Proulx wrote: > Chris Bannister wrote: > > François Patte wrote: > > > I tried to install libdvdcss2 from this repository and followed a tuto > > > explaining that: > > > ... > > > deb http://www.deb-multimedia.org sid main non-free > > > > That is a 3rd part

Re: deb-multimedia repository

Chris Bannister wrote: > François Patte wrote: > > I tried to install libdvdcss2 from this repository and followed a tuto > > explaining that: > > ... > > deb http://www.deb-multimedia.org sid main non-free > > That is a 3rd party repository and not supported by Debian, if you have > any issues wi

Re: trusting repository keys (was: deb-multimedia repository)

ng evil. Yes, and Secure Apt is supposed to protect you from this kind of attack. > Sure, if the multimedia guys do something evil, than > no key will add security. The key only should ensure that the package is > a package from multimedia. Yes. But with the twist I already mentioned: apt doe

Re: trusting repository keys (was: deb-multimedia repository)

then hack the package to do something evil. Sure, if the multimedia guys do something evil, than no key will add security. The key only should ensure that the package is a package from multimedia. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubsc

trusting repository keys (was: deb-multimedia repository)

Ralf Mardorf: > On Wed, 2013-08-21 at 13:38 +0200, Jochen Spieker wrote: >> Essentially, you have a chicken and egg problem. > > Wrong! No. Your advice is dangerous. > Keys usually are available by a keyserver you could trust, No. Just because a keyserver happens to serve some key that does not

Re: deb-multimedia repository

On Wed, 2013-08-21 at 22:20 +1000, Zenaan Harkness wrote: > On 8/21/13, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > > On Wed, 2013-08-21 at 13:38 +0200, Jochen Spieker wrote: > >> Essentially, you have a chicken and egg problem. > > > > Wrong! > > Subtle! > > > Keys usually are available by a keyserver you could trus

Re: deb-multimedia repository

On 8/21/13, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > On Wed, 2013-08-21 at 13:38 +0200, Jochen Spieker wrote: >> Essentially, you have a chicken and egg problem. > > Wrong! Subtle! > Keys usually are available by a keyserver you could trust, so for the > first time you'll get the key this way. Such a package will

Re: deb-multimedia repository

On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 12:13:44PM +0200, François Patte wrote: > Bonjour, > > I tried to install libdvdcss2 from this repository and followed a tuto > explaining that: > > 1- install deb-multimedia-keyring > > this package was not found seems to be correct because

Re: deb-multimedia repository

On Wed, 2013-08-21 at 13:38 +0200, Jochen Spieker wrote: > Essentially, you have a chicken and egg problem. Wrong! Keys usually are available by a keyserver you could trust, so for the first time you'll get the key this way. Such a package will update keys as long as the older keys still can be u

Re: deb-multimedia repository

François Patte: > > ATTENTION : les paquets suivants n'ont pas été authentifiés. > deb-multimedia-keyring > Faut-il installer ces paquets sans vérification (o/N) ? > > OK! it seems to be "normal" because the right keyring is not installed... Exactly. Your a

Re: deb-multimedia repository

On Wed, 2013-08-21 at 12:33 +0200, Thierry Chatelet wrote: > You need to apt-get update after installing the keyring package. Assumed something unexpected should happen and he wants to post the output, then LANG=C apt-get update -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.or

Re: deb-multimedia repository

François please use LANG=C to switch to English output. The keyring adds security. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1377081910.1192.44.camel@archlinux

Re: deb-multimedia repository

The Wednesday 21 August 2013 12:13:44, François Patte wrote : > Bonjour, > > I tried to install libdvdcss2 from this repository and followed a tuto > explaining that: > > 1- install deb-multimedia-keyring > > this package was not found seems to be correct because

deb-multimedia repository

Bonjour, I tried to install libdvdcss2 from this repository and followed a tuto explaining that: 1- install deb-multimedia-keyring this package was not found seems to be correct because the sources-list file should be modified before. That's what I did, adding: deb http://ww

Re: apt pinning for deb-multimedia does not work

the man page does not say anything about how to interpret it… Anyways, thanks for the hint, the following pinning works as expected: Package: * Pin: release o=Unofficial Multimedia Packages Pin-Priority: 450 Package: libav* Pin: release o=Unofficial Multimedia Packages Pin-Priority: -1 Cheers, Rol

Re: apt pinning for deb-multimedia does not work

> > $ apt-cache policy libavdevice53 > > libavdevice53: > > Installed: 6:9.3-1 > > Candidate: 7:0.10.3-dmo1 > > Package pin: 7:0.10.3-dmo1 > > Version table: > > 7:0.10.3-dmo1 250 > > 500 > > http://debian-multimedia.inform

Re: apt pinning for deb-multimedia does not work

Hi, Dňa 20.06.2013 19:13 Andrei POPESCU wrote / napísal(a): > On Ma, 18 iun 13, 18:00:37, Roland Hieber wrote: >> My preferences look like this: >> >> $ cat /etc/apt/preferences.d/*.pref >> Package: libavdevice53 >> Pin: release o=Unofficial Multimedia Packag

Re: apt pinning for deb-multimedia does not work

On Ma, 18 iun 13, 18:00:37, Roland Hieber wrote: > Hi, > > I want to pin the libav* packages from deb-multimedia so they get a > lower priority than the libav packages in the default Debian repos. > > My sources.list looks like this: > > $ cat /etc/apt/sources.list /etc/

apt pinning for deb-multimedia does not work

Hi, I want to pin the libav* packages from deb-multimedia so they get a lower priority than the libav packages in the default Debian repos. My sources.list looks like this: $ cat /etc/apt/sources.list /etc/apt/sources.list.d/*list # deb [arch=amd64,i386] http://debian.tu-bs.de/debian/ wheezy

Re: How can I know which deb-multimedia packages I have installed?

Csanyi Pal wrote: > Bob Proulx writes: > > You can purge and re-install packages. But that may not be the same > > as a clean installation. It is much easier to simply create a clean > > chroot and install there. > > I created a clean chroot by running the following commands in a > directory cal

Re: How can I know which deb-multimedia packages I have installed?

gt; >> I want to follow advice of Michael Gilbert: >> >> "You have a mix of deb-multimedia packages, which often leads to >> problems. Please try to reproduce this on a clean installation." >> >> So I change my sources.list: >> >> deb

Re: How can I know which deb-multimedia packages I have installed?

t;> > >>>> So how can I know now which debian packages are installed from these > >>>> deb-multimedia repositories abowe? > >>> > >>> aptitude search '~i ~O"Unofficial Multimedia Packages"' > >> > >> So I

Re: How can I know which deb-multimedia packages I have installed?

. Unless you take special care by pinning your system is a Sid system. > I have installed vuze but I can't to use it. I reported a bug here: > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=%23700090 > > I want to follow advice of Michael Gilbert: > > "You have a mix of

Re: How can I know which deb-multimedia packages I have installed?

2013-02-25 21:03, Slavko skrev: Dňa 25.02.2013 20:33:04 Tixy napísal(a): On Sun, 2013-02-24 at 21:51 +0100, Slavko wrote: Dňa 24.02.2013 21:20:35 Csanyi Pal napísal(a): So how can I know now which debian packages are installed from these deb-multimedia repositories abowe? aptitude

Re: How can I know which deb-multimedia packages I have installed?

Ahoj, Dňa 25.02.2013 20:33:04 Tixy napísal(a): > On Sun, 2013-02-24 at 21:51 +0100, Slavko wrote: >> Hi >> >> Dňa 24.02.2013 21:20:35 Csanyi Pal napísal(a): >> >>> So how can I know now which debian packages are installed from these >>> deb-multime

Re: How can I know which deb-multimedia packages I have installed?

On Sun, 2013-02-24 at 21:51 +0100, Slavko wrote: > Hi > > Dňa 24.02.2013 21:20:35 Csanyi Pal napísal(a): > > > So how can I know now which debian packages are installed from these > > deb-multimedia repositories abowe? > > aptitude search '~i ~O"Unof

Re: How can I know which deb-multimedia packages I have installed?

Hi Dňa 24.02.2013 21:20:35 Csanyi Pal napísal(a): > So how can I know now which debian packages are installed from these > deb-multimedia repositories abowe? aptitude search '~i ~O"Unofficial Multimedia Packages"' regards -- Slavko http://slavino.sk signatur

How can I know which deb-multimedia packages I have installed?

x27;t to use it. I reported a bug here: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=%23700090 I want to follow advice of Michael Gilbert: "You have a mix of deb-multimedia packages, which often leads to problems. Please try to reproduce this on a clean installation." So I change

Re: Action/Multimedia Keys not working Windowmaker

Hi Ralf, On 12 February 2013 14:12, Ralf Mardorf wrote: >> Btw. I experienced on other distros that PA today is easy to remove and >> don't use a dummy package anymore I've uninstalled pulseaudio - that went when I uninstalled Gnome - sorry for any confusion (and yes, libpulse is indeed still in

Re: Action/Multimedia Keys not working Windowmaker

PS: Don't confuse pulseaudio with libpulse, there's no need to install libpulse or what ever the package is named. Btw. I experienced on other distros that PA today is easy to remove and don't use a dummy package anymore and in some cases it's possible to really disable it, without any drawbacks a

Re: Action/Multimedia Keys not working Windowmaker

PPS: On Tue, 2013-02-12 at 15:11 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > PS: Don't confuse pulseaudio with libpulse, there's no need to install ^^^ A typo: remove, uninstall > libpulse or what e

Re: Action/Multimedia Keys not working Windowmaker

I don't know if pulseaudio has to do with your multimedia key issue, I don't think so, OTOH for this software everything seems to be possible. However, I neither like multimedia keys, nor pulseaudio. If you want to get rid of PA, I should be able to help you. I don't know which o

Action/Multimedia Keys not working Windowmaker

Hello all, After a full day's hard googling, I posted this to debian-laptop yesterday, but haven't had a response, so maybe here is a more appropriate place? Apologies in advance if not. I'm running Wheezy and the multimedia/volume keys don't work in Windowmaker (they work

Re: how to get missing multimedia packages

On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 12:22:03PM +0100, Pierre Frenkiel wrote: > On Mon, 4 Feb 2013, Chris Bannister wrote: > > >Just be aware that if you strike any bugs and any dmo packages are > >involved, it will be closed without any further ado. The deb-multimedia > >reposito

Re: how to get missing multimedia packages

On Mon, 4 Feb 2013, Chris Bannister wrote: Just be aware that if you strike any bugs and any dmo packages are involved, it will be closed without any further ado. The deb-multimedia repository is toxic to a healthy wheezy system. Take it from me, I spent ages cleaning up my system when I

  1   2   3   4   5   >