On Friday December 28 2007 14:48:33 David Brodbeck wrote:
> On Dec 28, 2007, at 11:17 AM, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > That's not how it works on z/OS (OS/MVS), DOS/VSE & OpenVMS.
> >
> > On them, you have "named batch queues". Each queue has a
> > default (in Unix terminology) niceness level, and "widt
On Dec 28, 2007, at 11:17 AM, Ron Johnson wrote:
That's not how it works on z/OS (OS/MVS), DOS/VSE & OpenVMS.
On them, you have "named batch queues". Each queue has a default
(in Unix terminology) niceness level, and "width" (like how a
bank branch has a single line feeding multiple teller win
On Friday December 28 2007 10:23:26 Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 28, 2007 at 06:58:42AM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > On Friday December 28 2007 00:27:24 Jerome BENOIT wrote:
> > [snip]
> >
> > > I have a long list of jobs that I want to launch on my box.
> > > On a one core box, I can mak
On Fri, Dec 28, 2007 at 06:58:42AM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On Friday December 28 2007 00:27:24 Jerome BENOIT wrote:
> [snip]
> >
> > I have a long list of jobs that I want to launch on my box.
> > On a one core box, I can make a for loop in order to submit
> > then in sequence. On a multi-core
On Friday December 28 2007 00:27:24 Jerome BENOIT wrote:
[snip]
>
> I have a long list of jobs that I want to launch on my box.
> On a one core box, I can make a for loop in order to submit
> then in sequence. On a multi-core box, this approach does not
> work anymore. Hence my intention to use Tor
Hello,
Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
On Fri, Dec 28, 2007 at 10:00:02AM +0800, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
(On this list, we either intersperse comments or bottom post)
Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
On Thu, Dec 27, 2007 at 06:57:20AM +0800, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
I am looking for a management system for a multic
On Fri, Dec 28, 2007 at 10:00:02AM +0800, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
(On this list, we either intersperse comments or bottom post)
> Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
> >On Thu, Dec 27, 2007 at 06:57:20AM +0800, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
> >>I am looking for a management system for a multicore system (2 and 4):
> >>na
Hello,
I made some progress since my post:
I am not really looking for an alternative to `at',
but rather something similar `Torque':
www.clusterresources.com/pages/products/torque-resource-manager.php
May be this tools is too powerful for a single computer:
hence my request.
Jerome
Douglas A
On Thu, Dec 27, 2007 at 06:57:20AM +0800, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
> I am looking for a management system for a multicore system (2 and 4):
> namely an alternative to `at' tools.
> Any suggestion is welcome.
More information needed.
Are you talking about sending pending jobs to free cores? Doesn't t
Hello List,
I am looking for a management system for a multicore system (2 and 4):
namely an alternative to `at' tools.
Any suggestion is welcome.
Thanks in advance,
Jerome
--
Jerome BENOIT
jgmbenoit_at_mailsnare_dot_net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubs
10 matches
Mail list logo
