Re: multi-processor kernel

2000-01-04 Thread aphro
im approaching 5 months runtime with 2.0.36 SMP. at least cpu 1 is always loaded with [EMAIL PROTECTED], the other does some of the rest, running a asus p2b-d i *think* (never actually seen the board) with 2 p2 233s, 128MB ram and 2x4GB ultra 2 scsi drives on an adaptec 2940UW running in software

Re: multi-processor kernel

2000-01-04 Thread aphro
links 2.0.34 can support SMP although i would reccomend at least 2.0.36 for SMP, you can always turn X off in redhat, although im not sure how to. probably somewhere in /etc/rc.d or maybe /etc/inittab nate On Wed, 5 Jan 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: zdrysd >Hi zdrysd > zdrysd >does slink with k

Re: multi-processor kernel

2000-01-04 Thread Michael Procario
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > does slink with kernel 2.0.34 support a multi-processor system with 2 > power supplies? SMP support in 2.0 kernels is not great. I tried it and had crashes about once a day. I am now running with a 2.2 kernel under Redhat on the same machine and it is very stable (mul

multi-processor kernel

2000-01-04 Thread zdrysdal
Hi does slink with kernel 2.0.34 support a multi-processor system with 2 power supplies? We currently have our file server set up on redhat 6.1 running xwindows..but it crashes almost everytime we reboot. So I am thinking about putting debian slink on the machine and not running xwindows as we t