Hall Stevenson wrote:
> I don't think the mozilla packager builds 'mozilla-cvs' packages every
> day, so that helps. Otherwise, the nightly mozilla builds available from
> mozilla.org are purely automated builds. No human checks them, therefore
> they may not run at al
* Craig Dickson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [011206 17:38]:
> Jeffrey W. Baker wrote:
>
> > This is the expected behavior of Mozilla nightly CVS builds. If you
> > don't think it's fun, you'd better stick with release builds.
>
> No, most of the time mozilla-
Jeffrey W. Baker wrote:
> This is the expected behavior of Mozilla nightly CVS builds. If you
> don't think it's fun, you'd better stick with release builds.
No, most of the time mozilla-cvs works very well. Once in a while it
breaks badly. Tonight seems to be one such, so
On Wed, 2001-12-05 at 17:17, Craig Dickson wrote:
> Is anyone else having trouble with today's Sid update of mozilla-cvs (ver.
> 20011205)? It crashes a lot for me; I can't load http://www.theonion.com
> for example. The 20011130 version works fine.
This is the expected
Craig Dickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is anyone else having trouble with today's Sid update of mozilla-cvs (ver.
> 20011205)? It crashes a lot for me; I can't load http://www.theonion.com
> for example. The 20011130 version works fine.
>
Don't use the deb
Is anyone else having trouble with today's Sid update of mozilla-cvs (ver.
20011205)? It crashes a lot for me; I can't load http://www.theonion.com
for example. The 20011130 version works fine.
Craig
I don't know about anybody else, but suddenly "Block images from this
server" has disappeared from mozilla-cvs, making it a bit more difficult
to defeat the ads...
--
Baloo
Tonight I installed the newest mozilla-cvs packages. I find that this new
mozilla segfaults immediately when executed. Downgrading to the last
mozilla-cvs fixes the problem. Is anyone else seeing this? Is there any
way to get the new mozilla-cvs to work?
Craig
8 matches
Mail list logo
