On 31/07/10 06:02 PM, Florian Kulzer wrote:
I did that, too, and then I clicked on the flashblock placeholder icon
for the video; it loaded and played normally.
Yes, that is due to flashblock, I have to click that too to let
flashplayer do its job. Didn't work on cnn for me.
Note that I h
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 11:17:45 -0400, H.S. wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Anyone else having trouble playing videos on CCN website? I don't
> frequent it and am not sure if this happens with all the vidoes
> there. On Debian Testing amd64, in iceape with flashplayer,
> flashblock, noscript and adblock inst
On Sat, 31 Jul 2010 11:17:45 -0400, H.S. wrote:
> Anyone else having trouble playing videos on CCN website? I don't
> frequent it and am not sure if this happens with all the vidoes there.
> On Debian Testing amd64, in iceape with flashplayer, flashblock,
> noscript and adblock installed, I am not
Hello.
Anyone else having trouble playing videos on CCN website? I don't
frequent it and am not sure if this happens with all the vidoes there.
On Debian Testing amd64, in iceape with flashplayer, flashblock,
noscript and adblock installed, I am not able to play the video linked
on this news
Hello,
On Debian Testing, if I drag a link to the Bookmarks menu the menu opens
fine. I have a large list of bookmark folders in it and I need to bring
the link (mouse button still depressed) to the little down-arrow near
the bottom of the list to make the list scroll up. However, it just
stays th
Greg Folkert wrote:
On Fri, 2007-05-11 at 17:33 -0400, H.S. wrote:
Hello,
If I try to enlarge the fonts (CTRL+Wheel) in iceape of this website:
http://gallery.menalto.com/
the menus, or those little gray background windows, on the right hand
jump into the middle of the page after a few magnif
On Fri, 2007-05-11 at 17:33 -0400, H.S. wrote:
> Hello,
>
> If I try to enlarge the fonts (CTRL+Wheel) in iceape of this website:
> http://gallery.menalto.com/
>
> the menus, or those little gray background windows, on the right hand
> jump into the middle of the page after a few magnification s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
KS wrote:
> Joe Hart wrote:
http://gallery.menalto.com/
>>
>> With my test (with iceweasel and konqueror), it depends on how large you
>> make the text. If it goes beyond a certain level, yes the windows move.
>> The way I see it, it is poor web
Joe Hart wrote:
> Ron Johnson wrote:
>> On 05/11/07 16:33, H.S. wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>> If I try to enlarge the fonts (CTRL+Wheel) in iceape of this website:
>>> http://gallery.menalto.com/
>>> the menus, or those little gray background windows, on the right hand
>>> jump into the middle of the page
Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 05/11/07 16:33, H.S. wrote:
>> Hello,
>
>> If I try to enlarge the fonts (CTRL+Wheel) in iceape of this website:
>> http://gallery.menalto.com/
>
>> the menus, or those little gray background windows, on the right hand
>> jump into the middle of the page after a few magnif
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 05/11/07 16:33, H.S. wrote:
>> Hello,
>
>> If I try to enlarge the fonts (CTRL+Wheel) in iceape of this website:
>> http://gallery.menalto.com/
>
>> the menus, or those little gray background windows, on the right hand
>> jump
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/11/07 16:33, H.S. wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> If I try to enlarge the fonts (CTRL+Wheel) in iceape of this website:
> http://gallery.menalto.com/
>
> the menus, or those little gray background windows, on the right hand
> jump into the middle of the
Hello,
If I try to enlarge the fonts (CTRL+Wheel) in iceape of this website:
http://gallery.menalto.com/
the menus, or those little gray background windows, on the right hand
jump into the middle of the page after a few magnification steps.
Is it just my iceape or is something wrong with the
On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 01:28:04AM -0400, Larry Moore wrote:
> Both epiphany-browser and mozilla-browser fail at startup with:
> ** ERROR **: file corba-orb.c: line 360 (CORBA_ORB_init): assertion
> failed: (ORBIT_ALIGNOF_CORBA_DOUBLE > 2)
>
> I'm running Sarge
Both epiphany-browser and mozilla-browser fail at startup with:
** ERROR **: file corba-orb.c: line 360 (CORBA_ORB_init): assertion
failed: (ORBIT_ALIGNOF_CORBA_DOUBLE > 2)
I'm running Sarge on a M68k Mac with low RAM (24meg) but 750 meg of
swap.
Is there a way to ge
Kent West wrote:
Welly Hartanto wrote:
I just realized that all of my mozilla's bookmark has just gone.
And everytime I start mozilla-browser all of the bookmark I had put
previously is gone.
I have checked on the debian reportbugs and none seem the same.
So, is it just me or what ? An
Welly Hartanto wrote:
I just realized that all of my mozilla's bookmark has just gone.
And everytime I start mozilla-browser all of the bookmark I had put
previously is gone.
I have checked on the debian reportbugs and none seem the same.
So, is it just me or what ? Anybody knows how to f
I just realized that all of my mozilla's bookmark has just gone.
And everytime I start mozilla-browser all of the bookmark I had put
previously is gone.
I have checked on the debian reportbugs and none seem the same.
So, is it just me or what ? Anybody knows how to fix it ?
Thanks
Rick Pasotto wrote:
Will there be a debian package for the newly released Seamonkey 1.0?
Will it replace mozilla-browser?
Thanks for the note. It would have escaped me.
Am going to give it a try.
Sorry that I can't answer your query.
H
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
w
On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 10:34:48PM +, Chris Lale wrote:
> Rick Pasotto wrote:
>
> >Will there be a debian package for the newly released Seamonkey 1.0?
> >Will it replace mozilla-browser?
>
> Does googling for 'site:debian.org seamonkey 1.0' answer your q
Rick Pasotto wrote:
Will there be a debian package for the newly released Seamonkey 1.0?
Will it replace mozilla-browser?
Does googling for 'site:debian.org seamonkey 1.0' answer your question
adequately?
Chris.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
Will there be a debian package for the newly released Seamonkey 1.0?
Will it replace mozilla-browser?
--
"But a government in which the majority rule in all cases can not be based
on justice, even as far as men understand it." -- Henry David Thoreau
Rick Pasotto[EMAIL
H.S. wrote:
Hi,
While reading the Slashdot news on the pirates bay, I noticed that when
I click on this link:
http://thepiratebay.org/legal.php
it starts to load but before finishing Mozilla browser crashed. The
message on the std out is "segmentation fault". The above link is on
For me it didn't crash
On 12/20/05, H.S. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> While reading the Slashdot news on the pirates bay, I noticed that when
> I click on this link:
> http://thepiratebay.org/legal.php
>
> it starts to load but before finishing Mozill
Hi,
While reading the Slashdot news on the pirates bay, I noticed that when
I click on this link:
http://thepiratebay.org/legal.php
it starts to load but before finishing Mozilla browser crashed. The
message on the std out is "segmentation fault". The above link is on
this
Hi,
i've few problems with the last sarge2 mozilla-browser :)
In the mozilla windaw, at the bottom there are messages like:
menuitem label="&ldbCmd.label;"
Anyone get it also or solved that problem ?
Thanks in advance
mess-mate
--
You worry too
On Saturday July 2 2005 07:34, Ms Linuz wrote:
> If this a very often thrown question, then I'm sorry since I can't find
> any problem solving related in my debian mailing list archive.
> So...I can't print from mozilla browser and thunderbird.I don't know
> exact
- Debian sid 2.6.11-1-686-smp
- CUPS 1.1.23-10
- Mozilla-browser 1.7.8
- Mozilla-thunderbird 1.0.2
If this a very often thrown question, then I'm sorry since I can't find
any problem solving related in my debian mailing list archive.
So...I can't print from mozilla browser an
On Sat, 10 Jul 2004 17:40:55 -0700
William Ballard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 10, 2004 at 05:32:50PM -0700, William Ballard wrote:
> > ... However,
> > many other interesting packages also depend on mozilla-browser.
>
> Strike that: apparently I
--- William Ballard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I suppose I'll just have to make a dummy mozilla-browser package with
> equivs and install that, and deal with breakages myself. Do you think
> that will be feasible?
Yes, this is exactly what equivs was designed for.
On Sat, Jul 10, 2004 at 05:32:50PM -0700, William Ballard wrote:
> ... However,
> many other interesting packages also depend on mozilla-browser.
Strike that: apparently I was way off base. A lot of the things like
"c-cpp-reference" don't explicitly depend on mozil
I want to try monodevelop, which depends on libgecko-cil (a mono binding
for embedding Moz) which in turn depends on mozilla-browser. However,
many other interesting packages also depend on mozilla-browser.
I build mozilla from source, and don't install it via a .deb or even
install it a
Hi,
I am using stable 2.4.18-bf24 and upgraded Mozilla 1.0.0 to 1.6.4 and
now some pages refuse to open unless I install Personal Security
Manager. I downloaded and installed it from the command line, now I have
a psm-start file that comes up with errors when I try to run it.
Anybody been down thi
However, I think this would
> wipe out all configuration values debconf maintains to facilitate upgrades.
>
> [snip]
Running /usr/share/debconf/fix_db.pl completed with no ouput.
apt-get install mozilla-browser then produced the same output as before.
One other piece of information - I
Colin Watson wrote:
> I think an unhandled db_go -> 30 might be a bug in the package,
> actually, not the debconf. The cases that (used to?) require fix_db.pl
> are normally db_input returning 10 and saying that a template is missing
> when it really is there.
>
> That said, I have no idea why db
estion skipped
> > + return 30
> > dpkg: error processing mozilla-browser (--configure):
> > subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 128
> > Errors were encountered while processing:
> > mozilla-browser
>
> I think your debconf da
LINE
> + RET=question skipped
> + return 30
[snip]
> + db_text low mozilla/prefs_note
> + db_input low mozilla/prefs_note
> + echo 'INPUT low' mozilla/prefs_note
> + local 'IFS=
> '
> + local _LINE
> + read -r _LINE
> + RET=ok
> + return 0
> +
of /var/lib/dpkg/info/mozilla-browser.config. Also, set
> DEBCONF_DEBUG=developer in the environment. Then run "apt-get install
> mozilla-browswer" again.
OK, I followed these steps, then did apt-get install mozilla-browser.
Chose "no" to FreeType2 support
Chose "none&
On Thu, Sep 19, 2002 at 01:07:51PM -0400, Levi Waldron wrote:
[snip]
> cedar:/usr/lib# apt-get install mozilla-browser
> Reading Package Lists... Done
> Building Dependency Tree... Done
> The following NEW packages will be installed:
> mozilla-browser
> 0 packages upgraded,
nds came from /var/lib/dpkg/status, it looks
> like /var/lib/dpkg/status may be damaged.
>
> If the list is output of
> dpkg -I
> /var/cache/apt/archives/mozilla-browser_2%3a1.0.0-0.woody.1_i386.deb , I
> would guess the deb is damaged and needs to be downloaded again.
>
> W
gt; see libnspr4, which is installed but is not is not listed as required by
> mozilla-browser or mozilla-psm:
>
> Package: libnspr4
> Status: install ok installed
> Priority: optional
> Section: libs
> Installed-Size: 264
> Maintainer: Takuo KITAME <[EMAIL PROTECTE
> to install. Any ideas?
> >
> >
> > cedar:/home/lwaldron# dselect
> > Reading Package Lists... Done
> > Building Dependency Tree... Done
> > The following NEW packages will be installed:
> > mozilla mozilla-browser mozilla-mailnews mozilla-psm mozilla-x
elect
> Reading Package Lists... Done
> Building Dependency Tree... Done
> The following NEW packages will be installed:
> mozilla mozilla-browser mozilla-mailnews mozilla-psm mozilla-xmlterm
> 0 packages upgraded, 5 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
will be installed:
mozilla mozilla-browser mozilla-mailnews mozilla-psm mozilla-xmlterm
0 packages upgraded, 5 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
Need to get 12.0MB of archives. After unpacking 31.6MB will be used.
Do you want to continue? [Y/n]
Get:1 http://http.us.debian.org s
Hi Ron,
Am Freitag, 31. Mai 2002 17:27 schrieb Ron Johnson:
> As background, my system does not have a sound card, and
> flash animations work fine on my system.
Now sound is disabled and I'm sure I got the bug
http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58339.
Flash animation works now and I co
Hello Ren,
Am Freitag, 31. Mai 2002 19:36 schrieben Sie:
> There is some kind of audio wrapper in rc3 that should avoid
> hangs if /dev/dsp is already taken and flash wants to access the
> audio device.
That might be the reason, but unfortunately I don't know how to
make shure, that the soundd
On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 05:00:39PM +0200, gerhard wrote:
> Am Freitag, 31. Mai 2002 14:17 schrieb Ron Johnson:
>
> > > > It is then either a problem with the Debian build of mozilla
> > > > 1.0RC3 from unstable or a problem with my profile (though the
> > > > same profile worked
>
> Is there anyb
As background, my system does not have a sound card, and
flash animations work fine on my system.
On Fri, 2002-05-31 at 10:00, gerhard wrote:
> Am Freitag, 31. Mai 2002 14:17 schrieb Ron Johnson:
>
> > > > It is then either a problem with the Debian build of mozilla
> > > > 1.0RC3 from unstable o
Am Freitag, 31. Mai 2002 14:17 schrieb Ron Johnson:
> > > It is then either a problem with the Debian build of mozilla
> > > 1.0RC3 from unstable or a problem with my profile (though the
> > > same profile worked
Is there anybody who know if it could be the profile?
> > > It is bug 148219 in bu
Am Freitag, 31. Mai 2002 14:17 schrieb Ron Johnson:
Hi Ron,
> So I upgraded from 1.0RC2-3 to 1.0RC3-1 and tried it
> again. Poof. Mozilla immediately crashes.
I'm wondering why there are people who get flash working and other
who not.
I got the same problem but with the snapshot of 30.
So I upgraded from 1.0RC2-3 to 1.0RC3-1 and tried it
again. Poof. Mozilla immediately crashes.
-Forwarded Message-
> From: Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Debian-User
> Subject: Re: Possible problem with mozilla-browser 1+rc3-1 and flash
> Date: 31 May 2
Hi, Rene.
It sounds like you are making 2 contradictory statements:
> It is then either a problem with the Debian build of mozilla 1.0RC3 from
> unstable or a problem with my profile (though the same profile worked
and
> It works with other builds of mozilla 1.0RC3.
Nonetheless, it works for me w
Hi,
I've had a small problem with Mozilla that would crash under rather
weird conditions.
I reported it to bugzilla, but it could not be reproduced by others. I
then downloaded a build from mozilla.org, and it didn't happen there.
It is then either a problem with the Debian build of mozilla 1.0
begin csj quotation:
> Why bother, when galeon can run mozilla much better AOL can.
I used galeon for a while last year. The upgrade cycle got to be too
annoying, though -- every time a new mozilla package came out, it wanted
to uninstall galeon, and I'd have to mark it "hold" until a new galeo
On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 01:39:54PM -0800, Craig Dickson wrote:
> begin Greg C. Madden quotation:
>
> > This won't help your current predicament but I use 'mozilla' instead of
> > 'mozilla-browser'. This upgrades nine packages, Galeon, mail-news,
>
y. Now I am unable to install it or remove it.
>
> This won't help your current predicament but I use 'mozilla' instead of
> 'mozilla-browser'. This upgrades nine packages, Galeon, mail-news,
> browser, -psm,.. & libs.
>
No, doesn't help me much.
I
begin Greg C. Madden quotation:
> This won't help your current predicament but I use 'mozilla' instead of
> 'mozilla-browser'. This upgrades nine packages, Galeon, mail-news,
> browser, -psm,.. & libs.
I don't know about Kevin, but I intentionally d
dicament but I use 'mozilla' instead of
'mozilla-browser'. This upgrades nine packages, Galeon, mail-news,
browser, -psm,.. & libs.
--
Greg C. Madden
Debian GNU/Linux 3.0
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
n# apt-get install mozilla-browser
> Reading Package Lists... Done
> Building Dependency Tree... Done
> Sorry, mozilla-browser is already the newest version.
> 0 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 1 not upgraded.
> 1 packages not fully installed or removed.
> Need to
Running SID. Did apt-get upgrade on 2/10 and mozilla failed to upgrade.
Not sure if this is a packaging problem or my system got hosed in some
way. Now I am unable to install it or remove it.
#INSTALL ATTEMPT
debian:/home/kevin# apt-get install mozilla-browser
Reading Package Lists... Done
Craig Dickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hall Stevenson wrote:
>
> The mozilla-browser-cvs for 20011024 seems to be broken. I'm still running
> the one from 20011017 without problems.
>
To minimise the number of "faulty" cvs packages you install, you mig
Hall Stevenson wrote:
> I'm running unstable and tried 'mozilla-browser-cvs' a few times in the
> past few days. Each time, after running through the 'profile'
> setup/conversion, it segfaults. Sometimes it dumps a core file but more
> often it does not.
>
I'm running unstable and tried 'mozilla-browser-cvs' a few times in the
past few days. Each time, after running through the 'profile'
setup/conversion, it segfaults. Sometimes it dumps a core file but more
often it does not.
I've renamed my existing ~/.mozilla-cvs di
, 2001 at 08:44:17PM -0700, Craig Dickson wrote:
> Jack wrote:
>
> > Setting up mozilla-browser (0.9.4-3) ...
> > /var/lib/dpkg/info/mozilla-browser.postinst: line 29: 1724 Segmentation
> > fault regxpcom >/dev/null 2>/dev/null
> > dpkg: error pro
On Mon, Oct 01, 2001 at 08:44:17PM -0700, Craig Dickson wrote:
> Jack wrote:
>
> > Setting up mozilla-browser (0.9.4-3) ...
> > /var/lib/dpkg/info/mozilla-browser.postinst: line 29: 1724 Segmentation
> > fault regxpcom >/dev/null 2>/dev/null
> > dp
Jack wrote:
> Setting up mozilla-browser (0.9.4-3) ...
> /var/lib/dpkg/info/mozilla-browser.postinst: line 29: 1724 Segmentation
> fault regxpcom >/dev/null 2>/dev/null
> dpkg: error processing mozilla-browser (--configure):
> subprocess post-installation script retur
Hi,
Error mesg:
# apt-get install mozilla-browser
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
The following NEW packages will be installed:
mozilla-browser
0 packages upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to
apt-get install mozilla-browser in SID as failed. I am not a programmer, so
could someone help me with this:
Setting up mozilla-browser (0.9.1-2) ...
/var/lib/dpkg/info/mozilla-browser.postinst: line 17: 815 segmentation fault
/usr/bin/regxpcom >/dev/null 2>/dev/null
dpkg: error proc
Am I missing something, or does the Mozilla browser that comes with Slink not
work?
After starting ppp, I can start Mozilla, and it goes to the Mozilla home page,
and that's about it. If I type a URL into the Web site box, then hit enter,
nothing happens. If I go to the bookmarks, I can&
69 matches
Mail list logo
