On 1/1/2014 12:43 AM, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote:
> Thanks all, it was probably be my misunderstanding with both technologies
> (RAM and SSDs). i have been told that SSDs are fast enough like RAMs and to
> show the performance that person refer his OS boot time which was
> dramatically minimized.
Thanks all, it was probably be my misunderstanding with both technologies
(RAM and SSDs). i have been told that SSDs are fast enough like RAMs and to
show the performance that person refer his OS boot time which was
dramatically minimized.
i am also obsessed by the magic of ZFS. and ZFS people rec
On 12/31/2013 7:54 AM, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote:
> i dont know why i am saying is even practical or not.
>
> here is my free command
>
> @thor:# free -g
> total used free sharedbuffers cached
> Mem:31 31 0 0 0
2013-12-31 14:54 keltezéssel, Muhammad Yousuf Khan írta:
> i dont know why i am saying is even practical or not.
>
> here is my free command
>
> @thor:# free -g
> total used free sharedbuffers cached
> Mem:31 31 0 0
I'm probably missing something here, but why would you expect better
performance by moving cache from faster RAM to slower SSD?
On Tue, 31 Dec 2013 18:59:42 +0500
Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote:
> or an appropriate question would be . how can i use an SSD to boost the
> system Performance.
> i don't
or an appropriate question would be . how can i use an SSD to boost the
system Performance.
i don't wanna store data on SSD however just wana use it for performance.
On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 6:54 PM, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote:
> i dont know why i am saying is even practical or not.
>
> here is
i dont know why i am saying is even practical or not.
here is my free command
@thor:# free -g
total used free sharedbuffers cached
Mem:31 31 0 0 0 26
-/+ buffers/cache: 3 27
Swap:
7 matches
Mail list logo
